Skip to main content

Analysis of Individual Risk Belief Structures

  • Chapter
Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 7))

  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

An interactive computer program developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is presented as a methodology to model individualized belief structures. The logic and general strategy of the model are presented for two risk topics: AIDS and toxic waste. Subjects identified desirable and undesirable consequences for each topic and formulated an associative rule linking topic and consequence in either a causal or a correlational framework. Likelihood estimates, generated by subjects in several formats (probability, odds statements, etc.), constituted one outcome measure. Additionally, source of belief (personal experience, news media, etc.) and perceived personal and societal impact are reviewed. Briefly, subjects believe that AIDS causes significant emotional problems, and to a lesser degree, physical health problems, whereas toxic waste causes significant environmental problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J., 1982, “Acquisition of Cognitive Skill,” Psychological Review 89: 369–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalon, L. and Bower, G., 1984, “Discrimination Nets as Psychological Models,” Cognitive Science 8: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R., and Schmolze, J., 1985, “An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System,” Cognitive Science 9: 171–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. and Murphy, G., 1984, “Models of Concepts,” Cognitive Science 8: 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J. and Covello, V., 1986, “Knowledge Systems for Risk Communication,” presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Expert Systems and Expert Judgment, Porto, Portugal, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., 1984, “Informed Consent for Transient Nuclear Workers,” in R. Kasperson and R. Kates (Eds.), Equity Issues in Nuclear Waste Disposal, Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., and Hope, C., 1984, “Defining Risk,” Policy Sciences 17: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, C. and Eiser, J. R., 1984, “Characterizing the Perceived Risks and Benefits of Some Health Issues,” Risk Analysis 4: 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., 1987, unpublished material, Martin Marietta Data Systems, Denver, CO. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A (Eds.), 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R., 1986, “Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication,” Risk Analysis 6: 275–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. and von Winterfeldt, D., 1986, “Improving Risk Communication,” Risk Analysis 6: 417–424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. and Riesbeck, C. (Eds.), 1981, Inside Computer Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1979, “Information Processing Models of Cognition,” The Annual Review of Psychology 30: 363–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1982, “Facts Versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,” in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1984, “Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives on Risk and Safety,” Acta Psychologica 56: 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B. and Arrowood, L., 1987, “ARK–Acquiring and Reasoning About Knowledge,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Expert Systems in Government Conference, Washington, D.C., Oct. 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonn, B.E., Travis, C.B., Arrowood, L., Goeltz, R., Mann, C.A. (1989). Analysis of Individual Risk Belief Structures. In: Bonin, J.J., Stevenson, D.E. (eds) Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5684-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5682-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics