Abstract
The 1958 Food Additives Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act defines a food additive as “...any substance, the intended use of which results or may reasonably be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component ... of ... food....” Thus, even materials which may migrate to food in very small quantities from packaging materials have been subjected to regulation. With advances in analytical methods of detection over the years, ever lower levels of migrating substances are technically subject to food additive regulation. Is there some level below which a substance need not be considered a food additive? The agency has grappled with this “Threshold-ofRegulation” (T/R) question ever since 1958 and generally has handled such situations on a case-by-case basis. Increasingly, however, there have been calls for the agency to develop a T/R policy. To develop such a policy, the agency must consider a number of important issues such as the reliable measurement of low levels of migration; low dose risk assessment; the likely potencies of possible carcinogens; and an array of legal and regulatory constraints. The presentation will center on possible ways the agency might weave together this array of considerations to arrive at a viable policy for the Threshold of Regulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, (Title 21 U.S. Code), 1958, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
A. M. Rulis, “De Minimis and the Threshold of Regulation,” Food Protection Technology, Proceedings of the 1986 Conference for Food Protection, Charles Felix, Ed., Lewis Publ., Inc. and references cited therein (1987).
J. H. Heckman, “Fathoming Food Packaging Regulation: A Guide to Independent Industry Action,” Food Drug Cosmet. Law J. 42: 38–49 (1987).
C. J. Kokoski, “Regulatory Food Additive Toxicology,” Second International Conference on Safety Evaluation and Regulation of Chemicals, and Course on Safety Regulations in the USA, Boston University School of Medicine, Cambridge, MA, October 24, 1983.
Public Citizen v. Young,United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, October 23, 1987.
A. M. Rulis, “Safety Assurance Margins for Food Additives Currently in Use,” Regulatory Toxicol. and Pharmacol. 7: 160–168 (1987).
L. S. Gold et al., “A Carcinogenesis Potency Data Base of the Standardized Results of Animal Bioassays,“ Environ. Health Pers. 58:9–314 (1984).
W. G. Flamm, L. R. Lake, R. J. Lorentzen, A. M. Rulis, P. S. Schwartz, and T. C. Troxell, “Carcinogenic Potencies and Establishment of a Threshold-of-Regulation for Food Contact Substances,” in De Minimis Risk, Whipple, Ed. Plenum, New York, NY.
Monsanto v. Kennedy, D.C. Cir. 1979; 613 F. 2d 947.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rulis, A.M. (1989). Establishing a Threshold of Regulation. In: Bonin, J.J., Stevenson, D.E. (eds) Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5684-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5682-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive