Skip to main content

Risk Perception of Technologies: The Perspective of Similar Groups in Portugal and the United States

  • Chapter
Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 7))

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

The perception of risk is affected by demographic biases. This paper studies how those biases have caused segments of the population of two countries to perceive risk associated with contemporary technologies. Portugal and the United States are both western but culturally different. A questionnaire was distributed to college-level business students (mostly graduate students) at universities in Lisbon and New York. Statistical results show similarities and differences between the Portugal sample and the American sample. What was consistent in both countries was the way the sexes differed in their perception of risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. B. Ahmed and M. P. Hoefer, “Public Perception of Risk in Developing Technologies: A Case Study of a Business Community in Manhattan,” in: Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 5, pp. 325–335, L. B. Lave, Ed., Plenum Press, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. P. Hoefer and S. B. Ahmed, “How a Business Community Perceives Risk in Modem Technologies,” published by the Center for Applied Research (Working Paper #41), Pace University, New York, NY, March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Englander, K. Farago, P. Slovik, and B. Fischoff, “A Comparative Analysis of Risk Perception in Hungary and the United States,” Social Behavior I: 55–56 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Wildaysky, American Scientist 67: 32 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, 6th ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Kohler, Statistics for Business and Economics, Scott-Foresman and Co., Glenview, Ill, pp. 596–597, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoefer, M.P., Ahmed, S.B., Bernay, E., Dusaire, C. (1989). Risk Perception of Technologies: The Perspective of Similar Groups in Portugal and the United States. In: Bonin, J.J., Stevenson, D.E. (eds) Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5684-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5682-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics