Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter we will examine four basic methodologies and decision tools that are utilized in the CPBS approach to decision making. The first is Bayesian decision analysis, which forms the heart of the CPBS approach. Tests and measurements that are used to identify or detect a property of interest are generally not perfect. When tests are biased or inaccurate, it is often advantageous to use more than one test. The interpretation of a combination of test results can be problematic because there often exists a variable amount of information overlap (positive dependence) and differences (negative dependence) among the tests. It is a difficult problem to account for both the imperfection of the individual tests as well as their interdependencies in their joint interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderberg, M. R., 1973, Cluster Analysis for Applications, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. E., and Dreyfus, S. E., 1962, Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. O., 1985, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M., ed., 1975, Problems of Choice and Decision, proceedings of a colloquium in Aspen, Colorado, 24 June-6 July 1974, Cornell University Program on Science, Technology, and Society, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. T., 1982, Discrete and Dynamic Decision Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y. Y., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, Elsevier, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V., Haimes, Y. Y., Rosenkranz, H. R., and Pet-Edwards, J., 1985, “The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: A Bayesian approach,” Mutation Res. 153:135–166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, H. T., and Stephenson, W., 1975, An Introduction to Numerical Classification, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W., 1968, The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubes, R., and Jain, A. K., 1979, Clustering Methodologies in Exploratory Data Analysis, Department of Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, A., 1973, Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, D., 1971, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanadesikan, R., Kettenring, J. R., and Landwehr, J. M., 1977, “Interpreting and assessing the results of cluster analysis,” Bull. Int. Statist. Inst., 47:451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N., and Dillon, W. R., 1978, Discrete Discriminant Analysis, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J., 1978, “Alleged objectivity: A threat to the human spirit,” International Statistical Review, 46:65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y. Y., and Hall, W. A., 1974, “Multiobjectives in water resources systems analysis: The surrogate worth trade-off method,” Water Resources Res., 10:615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y. Y., Hall, W. A., and Freedman, H. T., 1975, Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources Systems. The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker, H. C., 1977, “Bayesianism: A Threat to the statistical profession?” Int. Stat. Rev., 45:111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, C., 1979, Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Choices and Models, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intriligator, M. D., 1971, Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R., and Raifia, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C., 1951, “Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities,” in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (T. C. Koopmans, ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 33–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W., and Tucker, A. W., 1950, Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V., 1985, Making Decisions, 2nd edition, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. F., 1972, “On the theory and construction of k-clusters,” Comput. J., 15:326–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. F., 1973, “Probability theory of cluster analysis,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 68:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D., and Zavoina, W., 1975, “A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables,” J. Math. Sociol., 4:103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, W. S., 1972, Computer-Oriented Approaches to Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P. G., 1978, “The mythical threat of Bayesianism,” Int. Stat. Rev., 46:67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemhauser, G. L., 1966, Introduction to Dynamic Programming, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pet-Edwards, J., Rosenkranz, H. R., Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y. Y., 1985, “Cluster analysis in predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using short-term assays,” Mutation Res., 153:167–185.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., 1968, Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, F. D., 1964, Heuristic analysis of decision situations, in Human Judgments and Optimality (M. W. Shelly II and G. L. Bryan, eds.), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, H. R., Klopman, G., Chankong, V., Pet-Edwards, J., and Haimes, Y. Y., 1984, “Prediction of environmental carcinogens: A strategy for the mid 1980’s,” Environ. Mutagen., 6:231–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J., 1962, “Subjective probability and statistical practice,” in The Foundation of Statistical Inference (L. J. Savage, ed.), Methuen, London, pp. 9–35 (discussion pp. 62-103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J., 1954, The Foundation of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. P., and Dubes, R. C., 1979, “The stability of hierarchical clustering,” Technical Report No. TR-79-02, Computer Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R. E., 1986, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., 1953, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd. edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. C., Feinberg, H. V., Elstein, A. S., Frazier, H. S., Neuhauser, D., Neutra, R. R., and McNeil, B. J., 1980, Clinical Decision Analysis, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. L., 1972, Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L., 1985, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making, Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pet-Edwards, J., Haimes, Y.Y., Chankong, V., Rosenkranz, H.S., Ennever, F.K. (1989). Fundamental Basics of the CPBS Approach. In: Risk Assessment and Decision Making Using Test Results. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5595-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5595-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5597-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5595-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics