Abstract
The applicability of the results of several NSF/PRA sponsored grants are examined in terms of specific risk situations which, among them, introduce most of the attributes frequently used in characterizing risks or stakeholder concerns and values. The risk situations used for case studies are the following:
-
asbestos in schools
-
hazardous chemical waste sites
-
indoor air pollution
-
transportation of common hazardous materials by rail or truck
-
contaminants in drinking water
-
the proposed construction of a plant which stores or employs
-
large quantities of a chemical like dioxin
A decision analyst, a lawyer, a philosopher, and a psychologist, all former and/or current principal investigators under NSF/PRA grants, have participated in the study first by providing selected papers and specific comments on the manner in which their work relates to the management of the specific risk situations. After two rounds of interchange of ideas by mail, a workshop was held involving the four NSF PIs, two individuals involved in actual management of some of the risks under consideration, and the UCLA group, including a consultant who provided a different psychological perspective. The results of the overall study, including recommendations for future research, are summarized in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baram, M., 1983 Memorandum to L. Okrent of November 14.
Baram, M. and J.R. Miyares, “Alternatives to Government Regulations for the Management of Technological Risks”, to appear in: Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis: The Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Crouch, E.A.C., and R. Wilson, 1982, Risk/Benefit Analysis, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass.
EPA Journal, 1984, Risk in a Free Society.
General Accounting Office (GAO), 1980, Indoor Air Pollution: An Emerging Health Problem, CED-80–111.
Hurwitz, H. Jr., 1983, “The Indoor Radiological Problem in Perspective”, Risk Analysis, 3: 63–67.
Lave, L.B., 1981, The Strategy of Social Regulation, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Lave, L.B. and T. Romer, 1983, “Specifying Risk Goals: Inherent Problems with Democratic Institutions”, Risk Analysis, 3: 217–227.
MacLean, D., 1982a, “Risk and Consent: Philosophical Issues for Centralized Decisions”, Risk Analysis, 2: 59–67.
MacLean, D., 1982b, “Values at Risk”, Prepared for Working Group on Risk and Consent, Draft.
MacLean, D., 1983, Memo to D. Okrent of November 8.
MacLean, D., 1984, Memo to D. Okrent of March 31.
Merkhofer, M.W., 1983, A Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Decision-Making Approaches, SRI International.
NAS, 1975, Decision Making for Regulating Chemicals in the Environment, National Academy Press.
NAS, 1982, Risk and Decision Making: Perspectives and Research, National Academy Press.
Okrent, D., 1984, Additional comments in letter from J. Ebersole, Chairman, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards to N.J. Palladino, Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. “ACRS Report on NUREG1070”, July 17, 1984.
Slovic, P., 1983, Memo to D. Okrent of October 17.
Slovic, P., 1983, Memo to D. Okrent of March 26.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein, 1980, “Facts and Fears Understanding Perceived Risk”, Societal Risk Assessment - How Safe is Safe Enough? Plenum Press, New York, pp. 181–214.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, 1981, “Informing the Public About the Risks from Ionizing Radiation”, Health Physics, 41: 589–598.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein, 1982, “Why Study Risk Perception”? Risk Analysis, 2: 83–93.
Spengler, J.D. and K. Sexton, 1983, “Indoor Air Pollution: A Public Health Perspective”, Science, 221: 9–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okrent, D., Apostolakis, G., Kastenberg, W.E. (1987). Studies on the Applicability of NSF/PRA Sponsored Research to the Management of Specific Risk Situations. In: Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5319-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5317-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive