Skip to main content

Legal Considerations in Quality Assurance

  • Chapter
Handbook of Quality Assurance in Mental Health
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Like other forms of professional conduct, those functions that can be subsumed under the heading of quality assurance have come under increasing judicial scrutiny. Although peer review has borne the brunt of this scrutiny in the 1980s, peer review is not equivalent to quality assurance, nor is it the only such activity to evoke the concern of the courts. In psychological training and practice, the process of enhancing the probability that professional psychologists will provide services of good quality encompasses many activities. It begins much earlier in time than peer review, involves examination by persons and groups who may be external to psychology itself, and includes review not only of individual performance but of institutional performance as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1977). Standards for providers of psychological services(rev. ed). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981a). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 633–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981b). Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services by clinical psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981c). Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services by counseling psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981d). Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services by industrial/organizational psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 644–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981e). Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services by school psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 670–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherman v. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, 45 Cal. App.3d 507, 119 Cal. Rptr. 507 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff, D. N. (1983). Hospital privileges and the antitrust laws. American Psychologist, 38, 1238–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff, D. N., & Jain, M. (1980). A practical guide to privileged communication for psychologists. In G. Cooke (Ed.). The role of the forensic psychologistSpringfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue Cross of Northern California v. Superior Court of County of Yolo, 61 Cal. App.3d 800,132 Cal. Rptr. 635 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charry v. Hall, 700 F.2d 139 (2d Cir. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen v. State, 121 Ariz. 6, 588 P.2d 299 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doe v. Prudential Insurance Company. No. C-2307-84 (New Jersey Supreme Court, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical Society, 34 N.J. 582, 170 A.2d 791 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Group Life & Health Insurance Co. v. Royal Drug Co., 440 U.S. 205 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, L. (1962). The action of abandonment in medical malpractice litigation. Tulane Law Review, 36, 834–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Overcast, T., Sales, B., & Pollard, M. (1982). Applying antitrust laws to the professions. American Psychologist, 37, 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People v. Pic’l 114 Cal. App.3d 824, 171 Cal. Rptr. 106 (1981), rev’d on other grounds, 31 Cal.3d 731, 646 P.2d 847, 183 Cal. Rptr. 685 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists, 1 Cal.3d. 160, 460 P.2d 495, 81 Cal. Rptr. 623 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quasem v. Kozarek, 716 F. 2d 1172 (7th Cir. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratino v. Medical Service of the District of Columbia, 718 F.2d 1260 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J. (1980). Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws. Whittier Law Review, 2, 667–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. R. (1983). Psychological and psychiatric peer review at CHAMPUS. American Psychologist, 38, 941–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sicpa North America, Inc. v. Donaldson Enterprises, Inc., 179 N.J. Super. 56, 430 A.2d 262 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1983). Doctors’ maximum fee plan is unlawful per se under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, Brigham Young Law Review, 10, 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union Labor Life Insurance Co. v. Pireno, 458 U.S. 119 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bersoff, D.N., Kinports, K. (1988). Legal Considerations in Quality Assurance. In: Stricker, G., Rodriguez, A.R. (eds) Handbook of Quality Assurance in Mental Health. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5236-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5236-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5238-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5236-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics