Progesterone Receptor Interaction in the 5’-Flanking Regulatory Region of the Ovalbumin Gene

Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 196)


Highly purified hen oviduct progesterone receptor A subunit has been found to interact preferentially with the 5’-flanking region of the chicken ovalbumin gene. Saturation kinetics showed that 2-fold less receptor was required for half-maximal binding to ovalbumin gene flanking sequences than to plasmid pBR322 sequences. Studies of selective binding were facilitated by a preferential adsorption assay involving gel electrophoretic analysis of [32P]DNA restriction fragments eluted from receptor-DNA complexes isolated on nitrocellulose filters. Approximately 10-fold difference in binding was observed at 37°C for a 1.7 Kb ovalbumin DNA insert compared to binding of receptor to a 3.6 Kb plasmid pBR322 fragment. Selective receptor A binding was dramatically reduced when assayed at 4°C. In addition to temperature dependence, preferential binding required the presence of glycerol or dimethyl sulfoxide during binding. Divalent cations and ionic strength had no apparent effect on the relative sequence selectivity but did alter the total DNA binding observed. Binding data from a variety of different restriction digests suggest receptor A interacts between −135 and −249 bp (upstream) from the start of ovalbumin transcription. Preferential binding to a DNA fragment containing the sequence −16 to −247 compared to an adjacent upstream fragment or plasmid DNA fragment confirm this assignment. This binding site lies within the regulatory sequence required for progesterone induction of a transfected fusion gene in primary chicken oviduct cells.


Progesterone Receptor Flank Sequence Preferential Binding Nitrocellulose Filter Plasmid pBR322 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. W. O’Malley, D. R. Roop, E. C. Lai, J. L. Nordstrom, J. F. Catterall, G. E. Swaneck, D. A. Colbert, M. J. Tsai, A. Dugaiczyk, S. L. C. Woo, The ovalbumin gene: organization, structure, transcription and regulation. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 35: 1 (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. LeMeur, N. Glanville, J. L. Mandel, P. Gerlinger, R. Palmiter, P. Chambon, The ovalbumin gene family: Hormonal control of X and Y gene transcription and mRNA accumulation. Cell 23: 561 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. E. Swaneck, J. L. Nordstrom, F. Kruezaler, M. J. Tsai, O’Malley, The effect of estrogen on gene expression in the chicken oviduct: Evidence for transcriptional control of ovalbumin gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 1049 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. S. McKnight, R. D. Palmiter, Transcriptional regulation of the ovalbumin and conalbumin genes by steroid hormones in chick oviduct. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 9050 (1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Mester, E. E. Beaulieu, Progesterone receptors in chick oviduct. Determination of total concentration of binding sites in cytosol and nuclear fraction and effect of progesterone on their distribution. Eur. J. Biochem. 72: 405 (1977).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Progesterone-binding components of chick oviduct. IV. Characterization of purified subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 247: 51 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. E. Hansen, A. Johnson, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Kinetics of progesterone binding to the chick oviduct receptor protein. J. Steroid Biochem. 7: 723 (1974).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. V. Vedeckis, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, The chick oviduct progesterone receptor. Biochem. Actions Horm. 5: 321 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. R. Hughes, N. L. Weigel, W. W. Grody, B. W. O’Malley, Studies on the structure and function of the chicken progesterone receptor. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 37: 51 (1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. L. Weigel, P. P. Minghetti, B. Stevens, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Identification of the structure of the chicken progesterone receptor. In: Steroid Hormone Receptors: Structure and Function, Eriksson H, and Gustafsson JA, (eds), Elsevier, Amsterdam p 25 (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. A. Coty, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Purification and characterization of the chicken oviduct progesterone receptor A subunit. J. Steroid Biochem. 10: 1 (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. L. Weigel, J. S. Tash, A. R. Means, W. T. Schrader and B. W. O’Malley, Phosphorylation of hen progesterone receptor by cAMP dependent protein kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 102: 513 (1981).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. T. Schrader, D. 0. Toft, B. W. O’Malley, Progesterone-binding protein of chick oviducts. VI. Interaction of purified progesterone-receptor components with nuclear constituents. J. Biol. Chem. 247: 2401 (1972).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. R. Mulvihill, J. P. LePennec, P. Chambon, Chicken oviduct progesterone receptors: Location of specific regions of high affinity binding in cloned DNA fragments of hormone responsive genes. Cell 24: 621 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. G. Compton, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Progesterone receptor binding to DNA: Studies by sedimentation velocity methods. J. Steroid Biochem. 20: 89 (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. D. Riggs, H. Suzuki, S. Bouregeois, Lac repressor-operator interaction. 1. Equilibrium studies. J. Mol. Biol. 48: 67 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. R. Hughes, J. G. Compton, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Interaction of the chick oviduct progesterone receptor with deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 20: 2481 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. G. Compton, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, Selective binding of chicken progesterone receptor A subunit to a DNA fragment containing ovalbumin gene sequences. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 104: 96 (1982).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. G. Compton, W. T. Schrader, B. W. O’Malley, DNA sequence preference of the progesterone receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 16 (1983).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. C. Dean, B. J. Knoll, M. E. Riser, B. W. O’Malley, A 5’-flanking sequence (-95 to -222) is essential for progesterone regulation of an ovalbumin fusion gene. Nature 305: 551 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. K. Laemmli, Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 118: 197 (1970).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Dugaiczyk, S. L. C. Woo, D. A. Colbert, E. C. Lai, M. L. Mace, B. W. O’Malley, The ovalbumin gene: Cloning and molecular organization of the entire natural gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 2253 (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Scheidereit, S. Geisse, H. M. Westphal, N. M. Beato, The glucocorticoid receptor binds to defined nucleotide sequences near the promoter of mouse mammary tumor virus. Nature 304: 749 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Pfahl, D. McGinnis, M. Henricks, B. Groner, N. Hynes, Correlation of glucocorticoid receptor binding sites on MMTV proviral DNA with hormone inducible transcription. Science 222: 1341 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Karin, A. Haslinger, H. Holtgreve, R. I. Richards, P. Krauter, H. M. Westphal, M. Beato, Characterization of DNA sequences through which cadmium and glucocortioid hormone induce human metallothionein-IIa gene. Nature 308: 513 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. J. Knoll, T. Zarucki-Schulz, D. C. Dean and O’Malley, Definition of the ovalbumin gene promoter by transfer of an ovalglobin fusion gene into cultured cells. Nucl. Acid Res. 11: 6733 (1983).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. H. Davidson, H. T. Jacobs, H. J. Britten, Very short repeats and coordinate induction of genes. Nature 301: 468 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. W. O’Malley, M. J. Tsai, W. T. Schrader, Structural considerations for the action of steroid hormones in eucaryotic cells. In: Steroid Hormone Receptors: Structure and Function, Eriksson H and Gustafsson JA (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam p 307 (1983).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. C. Hinkle, M. J. Chamberlain, Studies of the binding of E. coli RNA polymerase to DNA. I. The role of sigma subunit in site selection. J. Mol. Biol. 70: 157 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations