Skip to main content
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

The liver, although the largest visceral abdominal organ, has always been one of the most difficult to evaluate utilizing clinical palpation owing to its location beneath the rib cage. Radiographic evaluation of the liver prior to the era of newer imaging modalities had always utilized changes produced by the enlarged liver on the neighboring visceral organs such as the colon or right kidney. Diagnosis of hepatic disorders usually resulted in resorting to more invasive modalities such as angiography, transhepatic cholangiography, and liver biopsies. Fortunately, with the newer imaging modalities, the liver can now be directly visualized and evaluated, resulting more often in tissue-specific diagnoses without having to resort to more invasive procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronsen KF, et al: Evaluation of hepatic regeneration by scintillation scanning, cholangiography and angiography in man. Ann Surg 1970;171:567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Axel L, Mbss AA, Berninger W: Dynamic computed tomography demonstration of hepatic arteriovenous fistula. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981;5:95–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birnholz J: Diffuse liver disease. Clin Diagnostic Ultrasound 1979;1:35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kazam E, Schneider M, Rubenstein WA: (1980). The role of ultrasound and CT in imaging the gall bladder and biliary tract, in Alavi A, Arger P (eds): Multiple Imaging Procedures: Abdomen. New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1980, pp 233–310.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler RE, Stanley RJ: Computed tomography of the gall bladder and bile ducts, in Berk RN, Ferruci JT, Leopold GR (eds): Radiology of the Gall Bladder and Bile Ducts, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1983, pp 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leopold GR: Biliary ultrasonography, in Berk RN, Ferruci JT, Leopold GR (eds): Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1983, pp 201–238.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thaler MM, Gellis SS: Studies in neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia. Diagnosis. Am J Dis Child 1965;116:280.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weissman HS, Sugarman LA, Freeman LM: The clinical role of technetium 99m iminodiacetic acid in cholescintigraphy, in Freeman LM, Weissman HS (eds): Nuclear Medicine Annual, New York, Raven Press, 1981, pp 35–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bisker, J. (1986). Hepatobiliary System. In: Clinical Applications of Medical Imaging. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5083-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5083-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5085-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5083-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics