Fluorimetric Measurements in Enzyme Immunoassays
- 69 Downloads
The sensitivity of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) depends on the specificity and avidity of the immunochemical reagents, the specific activity of the enzyme label, and the detection limit of the enzyme product. When the antibody and enzyme systems have been optimized, the ability to detect the enzyme product controls assay sensitivity. When applicable, one of the simplest and most sensitive quantitative methods is fluorimetry. Colorimetry is limited to the parts per billion (10 -3µg/mL) level whereas fluorimetry achieves parts per trillion (10 6µg/mL) and, with the use of laser excitation, even sub-parts per trillion detection limits (Bradley and Zare, 1976, and Imasaka and Zare, 1979). This advantage is because fluorimetry measures a signal increase above relatively low background luminescence while colorimetry measures a small decrease due to absorbance from a large signal of transmitted light. Using fluorimetric microscopy, Rotman (1961) was able to detect single molecules of the enzyme β-galactosidase. Under more practical circumstances, the detection limits of fluorimetry are frequently limited by background fluorescence such as that arising from serum or other biological samples.
KeywordsHigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Enzyme Immunoassay Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Fluorimetric Detection Enzyme Label
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arakawa, H., Maeda, M., Tsuji, A., Naruse, H., Suzuki, E., and Kambegawa, A. (1983), Fluorescence Enzyme Immunoassay of 17a-hydroxyprogesterone in Dried Blood Samples on Filter Paper and Its Application to Mass Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31:2724–2731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forghani, B., Dennis, J., and Schmidt, N. J. (1980), Visual Reading Reading of Enzyme Immunofluorescence Assays for Human Cytomegalovirus Antibodies, J. Clin. Microbiology, 12:704–708.Google Scholar
- Hinsberg, W. D., Milby, K. H., Lidofsky, S. D., and Zare, R. N. (1981), Application of Laser Fluorimetry to Enzyme-linked Immunoassay, Soc. Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, 286:132–138.Google Scholar
- Kato, K., Fukui, H., Hamaguchi, Y. and Ishikawa, E. (1976), Enzyme-linked Immunoassay: Conjugation of the FAB’ Fragment of Rabbit IgG with β-D-galactosidase from E. Coli and Its Use and Its Use for Immunoassay, J. Immunology, 116:1554–1560.Google Scholar
- Kato, N., Ishii, S., Naruse, H., Irie, M. and Tsuji, A. (1980), Fluorophotometric Enzyme Immunoassay of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Using Peroxidase as Label, J. Pharmacobio-Dyn, 3:S-28.Google Scholar
- Leaback, D. H. and Creme, S. (1981), Extremely Economical Micro-ERMA Procedures for Performing ‘Sequential’ Fluorogenic Enzyme Assays and Fluorogenic Enzyme Immunoassays on Human Serum, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 9:580.Google Scholar
- Lidofsky, S. D. (1980), Laser Fluorescence Immunoassay, Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Tsuji, A., Maeda, M. Arakawa, H., Matsuoka, K., Kato, N., Naruse, N. and Irie, M. (1978), Enzyme Immunoassay of Hormones and Drugs by Using Fluorescence and Chemilumenescence Reaction, Enzyme Labelled Immunoassay of Hormones and Drugs (Pal, S.B., Ed.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York: 327–339.Google Scholar
- Yolken, R. H. and Leister, F. J. (1982), Comparison of Fluorescent and Colorigenic Substrates for Enzyme Immunoassays, J. Clin. Microbiology, 15:757–760.Google Scholar
- Yolken, R. H. and Stopa, P. J. (1979), Enzyme-linked Fluorescence Assay: Ultrasensitive Solid-Phase Assay for Detection of Human Rotovirus, J. Clin. Microbiology, 10:317–321.Google Scholar