Skip to main content

“Infant Doe”

Federal Regulations of the Newborn Nursery Are Born

  • Chapter

Abstract

The audience assembled represents a large cross section of individuals committed to health care: physicians, nurses, social workers, hospital administrators, lawyers, and the ministry. Most of you have read of the “Baby Doe” regulations and their implications for the care of severely handicapped newborns. It will be helpful to review the chronological events leading to these regulations and their present status. I should then like to consider why these are such difficult ethical dilemmas. As a physician practicing at the bedside, I shall be describing a perspective on these issues from the standpoint of the physician’s role in the decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Readings

  1. Fletcher, J. C, Abortion, euthanasia and care of defective newborns, N. Eng. J. Med. 292:76 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fost, N., Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns, Pediat. Ann. 10:17 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCormick, R. A., To save or let die, JAMA 229:172 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatment ,U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1983), 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson, J. A., and Fost, N., Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants-Legal considerations, /. Pediat. 58:887 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw, A., Randolph, J. G., and Manard, B., Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: A national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons, Pediatrics 60:588, Supp. 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinclair, J. C., et al. ,Evaluation of neonatal-intensive care programs, N. Eng. J. Med. 305:489 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Todres, I. D., Krane, D., Howell, M. C., et al. ,Pediatricians’ attitudes affecting decision-making in defective newborns, Pediatrics 60:197 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wegman, M. E., Annual summary of vital statistics-1980, Pediatrics 68:755 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weir, R. F., Selective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns: Moral Dilemmas in Neonatal Mediciney New York, Oxford University Press, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Aubrey Milunsky and George J. Annas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Todres, I.D. (1985). “Infant Doe”. In: Milunsky, A., Annas, G.J. (eds) Genetics and the Law III. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4952-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4952-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4954-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4952-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics