Skip to main content

Religious Experience and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

  • Chapter
  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Religion is a world view that imbues thought, feeling, and action with significance and value. Such a characterization is, of course, too broad to be considered a definition of religion. Its purpose is merely to call attention to some basic features that religion shares with other forms of human thought and action—in particular, with science. Scientific activity, like religious activity, is embedded in a world view that furnishes its rationale and purpose. The religion of the average person is seldom articulated as a coherent system of value and belief. But the same holds true for the average scientist. As Kuhn (1971) has pointed out, the practitioners of science are usually unaware of the presuppositions that guide their scientific practice. Long before Kuhn called attention to the similarity between this aspect of scientific and religious practice, William James (1902/1979) had noted another obvious similarity, namely, that not only religious ideas and sentiments but also scientific ones are rooted in the psychological and physiological conditions of the human mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G. W. The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. Religion and prejudice. Crane Review, 1959, 2, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1966, 5, 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1967, 5, 432–443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1953, 17, 327–333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. J. Religion and psychological health. In M. B. Merton (Ed.), Research on religious development. New York: Hawthorne, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, G. F., Faulker, J. E., & Warland, R. H. Dimensions of religiosity reconsidered: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Social Forces, 1976, 54, 866–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of Southern fundamentalists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1964, 4, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. Civilization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton, 1962. (Originally published, 1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S., The future of an illusion. New York: Anchor Books, 1964. (Originally published, 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. Obsessive actions and religious practices. In W. Sadler (Ed.), Personality and religion. New York: Harper Forum, 1970. (Originally published, 1907)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, R. W. A sociology of sociology. New York: Collier, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, R. W. The functionalist paradigm dominating the social-scientific study of religion and a structural alternative. Council on the Study of Religion Bulletin,1982, 13(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C. On the study of religious commitment. Research Supplement of Religious Education,1962, 7, 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (Ed.). The psychology of the self: A casebook. New York: International Universities Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. Religious experience amongst a group of post-graduate students: A qualitative study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1979, 18, 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. Forms of religious commitment and intense religious experience. Review of Religious Research, 1973, 15, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. A., & King, M. B. The intrinsic-extrinsic concept: A review and evaluation. In J. R. Tisdale (Ed.), Growing edges in the psychology of religion. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green, 1940. (Originally published, 1912)

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier, 1979. (Originally published, 1902)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, G. The measurement of religiosity: Problems and progress. Unpublished manuscript: Menninger Foundation, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. The privacy of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. B., & Hunt, R. A. Measuring religious dimensions: Studies of congregational involve‑ment (SMU Studies in Social Science, Vol. 1). Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H., The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H., & Wood, H., The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruyser, P. Between belief and unbelief. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reik, T. Ritual: Psycho-analytic studies (D. Bryan, trans). New York: W. W. Norton, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. Psychopathology and religious commitment. Review of Religious Research, 1971, 12, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Glock, C. American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. D. Psychoanalytic reflections on client-centered therapy in the light of modern conceptions of narcissism. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1976, 13, 2629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale, J. R. Introduction: Definition and measurement. In J. R. Tisdale (Ed.), Growing edges in the psychology of religion. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. Playing and reality. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. Two traditions in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1981, 20, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Puhakka, K. (1985). Religious Experience and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. In: Stricker, G., Keisner, R.H. (eds) From Research to Clinical Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4820-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4820-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4822-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4820-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics