Skip to main content

Exclusive Paths and Difficult Choices

An Analysis of Hard, Soft, and Moderate Energy Paths

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper has been prepared as a contribution to the growing debate concerning the evolution of viable alternative energy futures. We bring to it certain biases, the preeminent one being our agreement with the World Council of Churches on the ethical requirement that alternative futures on a global basis be “just and sustainable.” In this contribution to the dialogue and with this ethical bias we argue basically for a process by which one may objectively analyze the desirability of future energy goals. To us this process includes an equitable assessment of risks, a formulation strategy that is realistic, and an explicit consideration of the uncertainties of the current data base and those that always exist when one looks to the future [l–3].

An earlier version of this work was supported in part by funding from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. The authors themselves, however, bear total responsibility for the present paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. W. Goldsmith, I. A. Forbes, J. C. Turnage, S. V. Weaver, and A. R. Forbes, New Energy Sources: Dreams and Promises, Energy Research Group, Framingham, Mass. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. A. Forbes, Energy Strategy: Not What But How, Energy Research Group, Framingham, Mass. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Energy Daily 5, No. 105 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Nation’s Energy Future,WASH-1281, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Starr, The year 2000: Energy enough?, EPRI J. 1, No. 5 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. B. Lovins, Scale, centralization and electrification in energy systems, Symposium on Future Strategies for Energy Development, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tenn. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. B. Lovins, Energy strategy: The road not taken, Foreign Affairs 55, No. 1 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. B. Lovins, Soft Energy Paths: Toward A Durable Peace, Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Mass. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. L. Wilson, Energy: Global Prospects 1985–2000, Report of the Workshop on Alternative Energy Strategies, McGraw-Hill, New York (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Bell, The year 2000: The trajectory of an idea, Daedalus (Boston) 96 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. C. Ferkiss, Technological Man: The Myth and the Reality, The New American Library, Inc., New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Roszak, The Making of a Counter Culture, Doubleday, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. C. Putnam, Energy in the Future, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J. (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. M. Summers, Energy and Power, Freeman, San Francisco (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Marchetti, On strategies and fate, Second Status Report of the IIASA Project on Energy Systems, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. Energy and Economic Growth, 1975–2010,ORAU/IEA-76–7, Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge, Tenn. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Energy Balances of OECD Countries 1973/1975,Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Darmstadter, J. Dunkerly, and J. Alterman, How Industrial Societies Use Energy: A Comparative Analysis, preliminary report of a study prepared by Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. (April 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Marchetti, Primary energy substitution model on the interaction between energy and society, Chem. Econ. Eng. Rev. (Aug. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Smil, Renewable energies: How much and how renewable?, Bull. At. Sci. (Dec. 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Hirst, Residential energy use alternatives: 1976 to 2000, Science 194 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Schipper, in: Annual Review of Energy, Vol. 1, Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Von Hippel and R. H. Williams, Testimony on Behalf of the State of Wisconsin Before the GESMO Hearing Board, Docket No. RM-50–5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (March 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A Time to Choose America’s Energy Future,Final Report by the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation, Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Mass. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Efficient Use of Energy,AIP Conference Proceedings No. 25, American Institute of Physics, New York (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Cook, Study of Energy Futures, Environmental Design Research Associates, Chapel Hill, N.C. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. An Input/Output Analysis of Energy Use Change from 1947 to 1967, EPRI EA-281, prepared by Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif. (Nov. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Hall and D. Jorgenson, Tax Incentives and Capital Spending, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Economic and Environmental Implications of a U.S. Nuclear Moratorium, 1975–2010,Vol. II, ORAU/IEA (M)-76–10, Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge, Tenn. (Sept. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  30. ETA Report and Analysis Service,Control Analysis Corporation, Palo Alto, Calif. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A National Plan for Energy Research, Development & Demonstration: Creating Energy Choices for the Future,ERDA-48, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. (June 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A National Plan for Energy Research, Development & Demonstration: Creating Energy Choices for the Future,ERDA-76–1, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. (April 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Economic Growth in the Future,Edison Electric Institute, New York (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Proceedings of the Conference on Magnitude and Deployment Schedule of Energy Resources,Oregon State University, Portland (July 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Goldsmith (ed.), “Blueprint for Survival,” Ecologist 2, No. 1 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. P. Milton, Communities that seek peace with nature, The Futurist (Dec. 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. H. Butt, in: Soft vs. Hard Energy Paths, Charles Yulish Associates, Inc., New York (June 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nucleonics Week 18,No. 19, p. 14 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. J. Templin and P. South, Canadian wind energy program, Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Technology Workshop, Albuquerque, New Mexico (May 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  40. The Energy Daily 5,No. 87 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Proceedings of the Workshop on Modelling the Interrelationships Between the Energy Sector and the General Economy,EPRI-SR-45, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif. (July 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  42. G. W. Pickering and M. N. Maxey, in: Soft vs. Hard Energy Paths, Charles Yulish Associates, Inc., New York (June 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Energy International 13,No. 12, p. 19 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  44. G. C. Szego and C. C. Kemp, Energy forests and fuel plantations, Chemtech (May 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  45. I. A. Forbes, M. W. Goldsmith, A. C. Kadak, J. B. Muckerheide, J. C. Turnage, and G. J. Brown, The Nuclear Debate: A Call to Reason 2, Energy Research Group, Framingham, Mass. (Sept. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. C. T. Nisbet, Confessions of an environmental miser, Technol. Rev. 79, No. 5 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  47. The Energy Daily 5,No. 72 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. B. Lovins, “Invited Testimony for Hearings on the Costs of Nuclear Power,” Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations, Washington, D.C. (Sept. 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mineral Resources and the Environment,prepared by the Committee on Mineral Resources and the Environment (COMRATE) and the Committee on Natural Resources, National Research Council for the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forbes, I.A., Turnage, J.C. (1985). Exclusive Paths and Difficult Choices. In: Ott, K.O., Spinrad, B.I. (eds) Nuclear Energy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4589-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4589-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4591-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4589-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics