Abstract
In frog prey capture behavior an appropriate sensory stimulus at a given location in space triggers a complex movement directed toward the stimulus. We are interested in how the frog brain is organized so as to yield such a spatial correspondence between a stimulus and the resulting movement. Initial stages of the neuronal circuitry underlying prey capture appear to involve topographic sensory representations in the midbrain. The prey capture outputs are triggered or ballistic, suggesting that they are based on pattern generating circuitry at some unknown location in the brain. Given these considerations, one approach to the problem of the spatial correspondence between stimulus and movement is to ask how topographic sensory maps are linked to pattern generating circuitry. In this paper we will discuss several experiments directed at exploring this linkage. We will focus particularly on how our ideas about the organization which brings about an appropriate correspondence between input and output have evolved during the course of these studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Comer, C., and. Grobstein, P., 1978, Prey acquisition in atectal frogs. Brain Res., 153:217–221.
Comer, C., and Grobstein, P., 1981a, Tactually elicited prey acquisition behavior in the frog, Rana pipiens, and a comparison with visually elicited behavior. J. Comp. Physiol., 142:141–150.
Comer, C., and Grobstein, P., 1981b, Involvement of midbrain structures in tactually and visually elicited prey acquisition behavior in the frog, Rana pipiens. J. Comp. Physiol., 142:151–160.
Comer, C., and Grobstein, P., 1981c, Organization of sensory inputs to the midbrain of the frog, Rana pipiens. J. Comp. Physiol., 142:161–168.
Ewert, J.-P., 1967a, Aktivierung der Verhaltensfolge beim Beutefang der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo) durch elektrische Mittelhirnreizung. Z. vergl. Physiol., 71:165–189.
Ewert, J.-P., 1967b, Elektrische Reizung des retinalen Projektionsfeldes im Mittelhirn der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol., 295:90–98.
Ewert, J.-P., and Borchers, H.-W., 1971, Reaktionscharakteristik von Neuronen aus dem Tectum opticum und Subtectum der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). Z. vergl. Physiol., 71:165–189.
Fite, K.V., 1969, Single unit analysis of binocular neurons in the frog optic tectum. Exp. Neurol., 24:475–486.
Fite, K.V., 1973, The visual fields of the frog and toad: A comparative study. Behav. Biol., 9:707–718.
Fukson, O.I., Berkinblit, M.B., and Feldman, A.G., 1980, The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. Science, 209:1261–1263.
Grobstein, P., Comer, C., and Kostyk, S., 1980, The potential binocular field and its tectal representation in Rana pipiens. J. Comp. Neurol., 190:175–185.
Gordon, B., Moran, J., and Presson, J., 1979, Visual field deficits in cats with one eye rotated. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 5:626.
Grüsser, O.-J., Grüsser-Cornehls, U., 1973, Neuronal mechanisms of visual movement perception and some psychophysical and behavioral correlations, in “Handbook of Sensory Physiology” Vol. VII/3A, R. Jung, ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Ingle, D., 1970, Visuomotor functions of the frog optic tectum. Brain Behav., Evol., 3:57–71.
Ingle, D., 1973, Two visual systems in the frog. Science, 181:1053–1055.
Ingle, D., 1982, The analysis of visuomotor organization in some vertebrates, in “Advances in Analysis of Visual Behavior”, D. Ingle, M. Goodale, and R. Mansfield, eds., M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., (in press).
Kostyk, S.K., and Grobstein, P., 1980, Visual prey acquisition behavior in the frog: Effects of various unilateral lesions. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 6:75.
Kostyk, S.K., and Grobstein, P., 1982, Visual orienting deficits in frogs with various unilateral lesions. Behav. Brain Res., (submitted).
Krasne, F.B., and Wine, J.J., 1977, Control of crayfish escape behavior, in “Identified Neurons and Behavior of Arthropods”, G. Hoyle, ed., Plenum Press, New York.
Peck, C.K., Barber, G., Pilsecker, C.E., and Wark, R.C., 1980, Visual field deficits in cats reared with cyclodeviations of the eyes. Exp. Brain Res., 41:61–74.
Raphan, T., and Cohen, B., 1978, Brainstem mechanisms for rapid and slow eye movements. Ann. Rev. Physiol., 40:527–552.
Scalia, F., and Fite, K., 1974, A retinotopic analysis of the central connections of the optic nerve in the frog. J. Comp. Neurol., 158:455–478.
Sperry, R.W., 1944, Optic nerve regeneration with return of vision in anurans. J. Neurophysiol., 7:57–69.
Sperry, R.W., 1948, Orderly patterning of synaptic associations in regeneration of intracerebral fiber tracts mediating visuomotor coordination. Anat. Rec., 102:63–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grobstein, P., Comer, C., Kostyk, S.K. (1983). Frog Prey Capture Behavior: Between Sensory Maps and Directed Motor Output. In: Ewert, JP., Capranica, R.R., Ingle, D.J. (eds) Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology. NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, vol 56. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4412-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4412-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4414-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4412-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive