Skip to main content

Eminent Domain, Inverse Condemnation, and Police Power

  • Chapter
Legal Aspects of Geology
  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

Eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and police power are three legal tenets by which the state can assert its dominion over private property for the public good. The state can, by exercising these powers, become involved in questions of water rights, mineral rights, and surface rights.

The line between compensable taking of private property and noncompensable regulation in the form of police power, if it exists, “is a line arbitrary in its precise location, but clear in the general criteria by which it should be found.”

Charles E. Corker

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Suggested Reading

  • American Jurisprudence 2d (1966), Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co., Rochester, N.Y.; Bancroft-Whitney Co., San Francisco, Eminent Domain, Vol. 26, Secs. 1–246; Vol. 27, Secs. 247–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corker, C. (1974), Limits to the petty larceny of the police power, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, 20th Proceedings, pp. 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, H., and Wieland, C. (1974), Inverse condemnation—A viable alternative. Denver L. j., 51: 529–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happy, J. (1971), Damnum Absque Injuria: When Private Property May Be Damaged Without Compensation in Missouri, Missouri L. Rev., 36: 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, I. (1974), Eminent Domain, Chicago-Kent L. R., 51: 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidinger, E. (1980), The public uses of eminent domain: history and policy, Environmental Law 11: 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riser, L. (1979), Police Power, American Jurisprudence 2d, Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co., Rochester, N.Y.; Bancroft-Whitney Co., San Francisco, Co.stitutional Law, Part IX, Vol. 16A, Secs. 360–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, U. (1982), “To take or not to take, that is the question”–Acquisitions of mining and mine-related rights through eminent domain, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Proceedings 27: 739–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, J., and Hecht, M. (1974), Landslide and Subsidence Liability, California Continuing Education of the Bar, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tank, R.W. (1983). Eminent Domain, Inverse Condemnation, and Police Power. In: Legal Aspects of Geology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4376-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4376-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4378-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4376-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics