Skip to main content

Subsurface Waters

  • Chapter
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Historically, legal concepts relating to ground water developed from the assumption that ground water was physically distinct and separate from surface water and that there were two principal classes of subsurface waters, namely, (1) underground streams of water flowing in known or ascertainable courses, and (2) percolating waters. It is now known that these assumptions were not well founded. All waters are interconnected through the operation of the hydrologic cycle, and with only a few exceptions, ground water percolates rather than flows in underground channels. Legal concepts relating to ground water developed rather independently from those relating to surface water. While the law governing underground streams is the same as that governing surface streams, the law governing percolating waters is essentially different.

“[Ground water] rises to great heights and moves collaterally, by influences beyond our apprehension. These influences are so secret, changeable and uncontrollable, we cannot subject them to the regulation of law nor build upon them a system of rules, as has been done with streams upon the surface.”

Roath v. Driscoll, 20 Conn. 533, (1850)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Suggested Readings

  • Bittinger, M. (1972), Survey of interstate and international aquifer problems, Ground Water, 10 (2): 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, K. (1981), Protection of the means of groundwater diversion, The Public Land and Resource Law Digest, 18: 100–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1960), Ground water legislation in the light of experience in the western states, Montana L. Rev., 22: 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, T. (1974), Water law-well permits-unappropriated water and maximum utilization, Denver L. J., 51: 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, W., and Walker, W. (1973), Ground-water implications of recent federal law, Ground Water, 11: 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewsnup, R. L., and Jensen, D. W. (1973), A Summary-Digest of State Water Laws, National Water Commission. Arlington, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, T. (1976), Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974—History and critique, Env. Affairs, 5 (3): 501–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. H. (1965), Water rights and regulations in the eastern states, Ground Water, 3: 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (1974), Management of interstate ground water, Natural Resources Law, 7: 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W. (1975), Equitable apportionment of interstate ground waters, Proc. Rocky Mountain Mineral L. Inst., 21: 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, N. (1975), The Safe Drinking Water Act and ground-water protection, Ground Water, 13 (2): 142–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, W. (1955), Trends in the statutory law of ground water in the western states, Texas L. Rev., 34: 157–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, J. H. (1975), The Safe Drinking Water Act: Its first 250 days, Ground Water, 13 (5): 390–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (1969), Ground water management in the Raymond Basin, California, Engineering Geology Case Histories Number 7, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., pp. 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuiness, C. (1951), Water Law, With Special Reference to Ground Water, U.S.G.S. Circular 117, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. (1978), Federal groundwater rights: A note on Carpenter v. United States, Land Water L. Rev., 13 (2): 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, J. (1976), A postscript to the Mutual Prescription Doctrine-City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando, Land Water L. Rev., 11 (1): 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendley, W. (1976), Allocating buried treasure: Federal litigation involving interstate ground water, Land Water L. Rev., 11 (1): 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R. (1955), Comments: Liability of landowners for pollution of percolating waters, Marquette L. Rev., 39 (2): 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, Z. (1973), Ground-water hydrology and NEPA, Ground Water, 11 (3): 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. E. (1955), Water Rights in Areas of Ground-Water Mining, U.S.G.S. Circular 347, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trelease, F. (1982), Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Proceedings 27: 1853–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. (1975), Are drillers legally responsible for ground water pollution? Water Well J., March 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tank, R.W. (1983). Subsurface Waters. In: Legal Aspects of Geology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4376-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4376-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4378-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4376-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics