Abstract
Lymph node dissection (LND) may be performed either for staging or for therapy. This discussion is limited to the former. LND has added considerable data to our clinical knowledge of prostatic cancer. At present it is the most accurate method of assessing nodal status. Utilizing LND the incidence of lymph node metastases has been related to the following parameters amongst others: size of the prostate, histologic grade (1), extent of intracapsular disease, extent of contiguous extra-capsular spread, especially to the seminal vesicles, and over-all clinical stage. LND has demonstrated that a percentage of patients felt to have disease limited to the prostate by clinical staging, in fact, have cancer metastatic to the lymph nodes. This information has had a significant impact on our concept of the percentage of patients in each stage at presentation. Patients with alleged localized clinical stage A1 disease have a 2–5% chance of having positive lymph nodes. The figure for A2 disease is 3–54%, for B1 disease is 10–40%, for B2 disease 39–45%, for C disease 50–80%. A recent review of the world literature (1) clearly documents the strong influence that histologic grade exerts on the likelihood of positive nodes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
R.E. Donohue, H.E. Fauver, J.A. Whitesel, R.R. Augspurger and R.R. Pfister, Prostatic Carcinoma: Influence of Tumor Grade on Results of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy, J. Urol. 17:435 (1981).
D.F. Gleason, Histologic Grading and Clinical Staging Prostatic Cancer in “Urologic Pathology: The Prostate”, M. Tannenbaum, ed., Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia (1977).
S.A. Kramer, Esperience with Gleason Histopathological Grading in Prostatic Cancer, J. Urol. 124:223 (1980).
Z. Wajsman, J. Gaeta, J.E. Pontes, L. Englander, S. Beckley and G.P. Murphy, Surgical Pathological Correlation of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Prostatic Cancer, Program of the Annual Meeting, American Urological Assn., p. 257, (1981).
W.J. Catalona, Value of Frozen Section Examination of Pelvic Lymph Nodes at Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Prostatic Cancer, Program of the Annual Meeting, American Urological Assn., p.137, (1981).
M. Golimbu, P. Morales, S. Al-Askari and J. Brown, Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Prostatic Cancer, J. Urol. 121:617 (1979).
C.B. Brendler, L.K. Cleeve, E.E. Anderson and D.F. Paulson, Staging Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Prostate: Risk Versus Benefit, J. Urol. 124:849 (1980).
L.P. Pertschuk, H.E. Rosenthal, R.J. Macchia, K.B. Eisenberg, J.G. Feldman, S.H. Wax, D.S. Kim, W.F. Whitmore Jr., J.I. Abrahams, E. Gaetjens, G.J. Wise, H.W. Herr, J.P. Karr, G.P. Murphy and A.A. Sandberg, Correlation of Histochemical and Biochemical Analyses of Androgen Binding in Prostatic Cancer: Relation to Therapeutic Response, Cancer (in press).
H.W. Herr, Complications of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Retro-pubic Prostate 1–125 Implantation, Urology, 14:226 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macchia, R.J. (1983). Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Prostatic Carcinoma. In: Pavone-Macaluso, M., Smith, P.H. (eds) Cancer of the Prostate and Kidney. NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, vol 53. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4349-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4349-3_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4351-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4349-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive