Skip to main content

Clinical Trials of New Drugs Special Problems

  • Chapter
Human Subjects Research
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Terminating an investigational drug in a clinical trial carries with it certain risks for subjects that are too often disregarded in the research protocol despite clinical indications that this critical posttrial period be anticipated prior to initiating the study. The potential for adverse consequences, as well as ethical considerations underlying all human experimentation, make it essential to consider special areas of concern relevant to the postadministration phase of the clinical trial. There are specific ethical and moral rights of subjects which may be jeopardized at trial conclusion, and there are direct harmful effects that may occur only in the posttrial period. These two concepts may be further divided into the following separate topics that warrant individual discussion:

  1. 1

    The failure to include the posttrial period in the requirements of informed consent.

  2. 2

    The failure to recognize that psychological and physical difficulties may result from the emotional consequences of loss of the trial agent.

  3. 3

    The failure to consider potentially negative and harmful physical effects subsequent to agent withdrawal.

  4. 4

    The failure to take account of long-term effects of an agent’s administration that are neither predictable nor foreseeable from short-term trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderman, E. L., 1974, Coronary artery syndromes after sudden propranolol withdrawal, Ann. Intern. Med. 81:625–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. K., 1955, The powerful placebo, JAMA 5(159):1602–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, H., and McCallie, D. T., 1979, Agina pectoris and the placebo effect, N. Eng. J. Med. 300:1424–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H., 1980, Placebos and the Philosophy of Medicine: Clinical, Conceptual, and Ethical Issues, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, A. C., and Alexander, C. P. T., 1976, Rebound hypertension after acute methydopa withdrawal, Br. Med. J. 1:1056–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, N., 1981, Anatomy of an Illness as Perceived by the Patient, p. 176, Bantam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial, 1976 The heterogeneity of “psychosomatic” disease, Psychosom. Med. 38:371-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, M. J., 1974, Investigational drug studies: Recent FDA efforts, in: Principles and Techniques of Human Research and Therapeutics (G. F. McMahon, ed.), pp. 45–49, Futura, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, M. J., 1980, The FDA’s classification system for new drugs: An evaluation of therapeutic gain, N. Engl. J. Med. 302(3):181–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FDA Drug Bulletin, 1980, February 10, Number 1, pp. 3-4. Goldberg, H. L., and Finnerty, R. J., 1979, Comparative efficacy of torfisopan and placebo, Am. J. Psychiatry 136:196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M. J. R., 1978, New methodology in clinical trials, Biometrics 34:709–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. B., 1963, Medical ethics and controlled trials, Br. Med. J. 1:1043–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, R. M., 1974, Ethical considerations in clinical research, in: Principles and Techniques of Human Research and Therapeutics (G. F. McMahon, ed.), pp. 31-38, Futura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna, L., 1975, Clinical trials of drugs from viewpoint of the academic investigator (a satire), Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18:629–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna, L., and Wardell, W. M., 1975, Commentary: The FDA, politics, and the public, JAMA 232:141–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebacqz, K., and Levine, R. J., 1977, Respect for persons and informed consent to participate in research, Clin. Res. 25:101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letters to the editor, 1979, N. Engl. J. Med. 301:1179–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. D., Gordon, N. C., and Fields, H. L., 1978, The mechanism of placebo analgesia, Lancet 2:654–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, M., 1975a, When is double-blind evaluation improper? J. Clin. Pharmacol. 15:84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, M., 1975b, Delaying double-blind drug evaluation in usually fatal diseases (Pelter), N. Engl. J. Med. 293:508–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, G. R., 1974, Current medical practice and the Food and Drug Administration: Some evidence for the existing gap, JAMA 229:1744–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, D. M., Gardos, G., Haskell, D. S., and Fischer, S., 1979, Placebo response, placebo effect, and two attributes, Phycopharmacology, 63:245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, A. W., 1975, Letter and ethics of randomized trials, N. Engl. J. Med. 293:1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadusk, J. F., Jr., 1974, The effect of drug regulation on the development of new drugs, in: Principles and Techniques of Human Research and Therapeutics (G. F. McMahon, ed.), pp. 58–68, Futura, Mt. Kisco, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, M. J., 1977, The regulation of clinical research, J. Clin. Pharmacol. 17:686–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shand, D. G., and Wood, A. J. J., 1978, Propranolol withdrawal syndrome—Why? (editorial), Circulation 58(2):202–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. K., 1964, Etiological factors in placebo effect, JAMA 187:712–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. K., 1968, Study of the placebo effect with a placebo test, Comp. Psychiat. 9:118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, F. G., 1977, Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy. Hypertensive crisis in renovascular hypertension, JAMA 238:1734–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, M. E., 1976, Ethics of clinical research, Conn. Med. 40(4):201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1977, Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of anti-anginal drugs, HEW(FDA) 78-3047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardell, W. M., 1974, Drug development, regulation and the practice of medicine, JAMA 229:1457–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., 1974, Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy, Lancet 2:1381–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S., 1959, Placebos, Res. Pub. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 37:147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelen, M., 1979, New design for randomized clinical trials, N. Eng. J. Med. 300:1242–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roginsky, M. (1982). Clinical Trials of New Drugs Special Problems. In: Greenwald, R.A., Ryan, M.K., Mulvihill, J.E. (eds) Human Subjects Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4157-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4157-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4159-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4157-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics