Skip to main content

Uranium and Thorium Minerals: Natural Analogues for Radioactive Waste Forms

  • Chapter
Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology ((ANST))

Abstract

SYNROC (1) and Supercalcine (2) are proposed crystalline radio-waste forms that may be regarded as highly radioactive “artificial rocks.” In these crystalline radioactive waste forms, rare-earth elements (REE), U and transuranium (TRU) elements are strongly partitioned into five phases. These phases have U- and Th-bearing mineral analogues. In SYNROC, the actinide bearing phases are perovskite (CaTiO3) and zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7). “BAIT” (BaAl2Fe8Ti13O38) is a phase which may occur in SYNROC formulations for wastes with large amounts of Fe and Al. “BAIT” may be structurally similar to davidite(Fe6Ti15036). Supercalcine actinide phases include silicate-apatite (CaREE4(SiO4)30), monazite ((Ce, La) PO4 and uraninite (UO2+x). The purpose of this paper is to summarize the relevant geologic literature on these phases. Emphasis is given to: (1) solid-solution chemistry, (2) mode of occurrence, (3) alteration and (4) radiation damage effects. A special effort is made to identify stable and unstable mineral associations, as this may be important if hydrothermal conditions occur in the waste repository. The idea of devising a radioactive waste form which is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its repository is appealing but impossible. This is apparent from the conditions for equilibrium between two or more phases, namely, for each chemical species, i, the chemical potential, U., must in each phase be equal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. E. Ringwood and S. Kesson, “Immobilization of High Level Nuclear Wastes in Ceramic Materials — A New Approach,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management, American Ceramic Society, Cincinnati, April 30-May 2 (1979) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. McCarthy, “High-Level Waste Ceramics: Materials Considerations and Product Characterization,” Nuclear Technology 32, 92 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Gluschchenko and A. F. Li, “Britholite from an Alkaline Massif in the Northern Baikal Area,” Nauch. Tr. Irkutsk. Gos. Nauch.-Issled. Inst. Redk. Tvsvet. Met. 14, 100 (1966) (Russ) [Chemical Abstracts 67:119051r (1967)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clifford Frondel, “Systematic Mineralogy of Uranium and Thorium,” Geological Survey Bulletin, 1064, (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. B. Jensen, “Distribution Patterns of Rare Earth Elements in Cerianite,” Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 47, 1 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. D. Schuiling and B. W. Vink, “Stability Relations of Some Titanium Minerals (Sphene, Perovskite, Rutile, Anatase),” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 2399 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Lebedev and 0. M. Rimskaya-Korsakova, “Ilmenitization of Perovskite,” Doklady Akad. Nauk SSR 66, 257–60 (1949). [Chemical Abstracts 43, 7379 (1949)]

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. A. Gorzhevskaya and G. A. Sidorenko, “Loparite Alteration Products,” Mineral. Sb. (Lvov) 23, 270 (1969) (Russ). [Chemical Abstracts 73, 89938Q (1970)]

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. A. Vlasov, ed., Mineralogy of Rare Elements, Vol. II, ( Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. D. Busche, M. Prinz, K. Keil and G. Kurat, “Lunar Zirkelite: A Uranium Bearing Phase,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 14, 313 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. G. Bulakh, G. A. I1’inskii and A. A. Kukharenko, “Zirkelite from deposits of the Kola Peninsula,” Zapiski Vesesoyuz. Mineral. Obschchestva 89, 261 (1960) [Chemical Abstracts 55, 9167 (1961)].

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. S. Blake and G. F. Herbert Smith, “On Varieties of Zirkelite from Ceylon,” Mineral. Mag. 16, 309 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Van Wambeke, “A Second Occurrence of Nonmetamict Davidite,” Mineral Deposita (Berl.) 3, 178 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haaker, R.F., Ewing, R.C. (1980). Uranium and Thorium Minerals: Natural Analogues for Radioactive Waste Forms. In: Northrup, C.J.M. (eds) Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3839-0_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3839-0_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3841-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3839-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics