Skip to main content

The Criminal Commitment System

Its Structure and Components

  • Chapter
Mental Health Law

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology ((PILP,volume 4))

Abstract

While conducting the empirical inquiry into the administration of psychiatric justice in Arizona (which formed the basis of the preceding chapter) we learned, from an interview with a superior court judge, of the following interesting incident: A criminal defendant in a rural county had been committed to the Arizona State Hospital as incompetent to stand trial (Ist). After the defendant had been confined as Ist for a few months, the superior court judge was visited by the County Board of Supervisors, who successfully urged the judge to dismiss the criminal charges and to recommit the patient pursuant to the civil commitment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dickey, Incompetency and the Nondangerous Mentally Ill Client, 16 Crim. L. Bull. 22 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bedau, Physical Interventions to Alter Behavior in a Punitive Environment, 18 Amer. Behavioral Scientist 662 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, Behavior Theory and the Models of Man, 29 American Psychologist 859 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Grazia, Diversion from the Criminal Process: The’ Mental Health’ Experiment, 6 Conn. L. Rev. 432, 436 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt & Morris, A Proposal for the Abolition of the Incompetency Plea, 40 U. Chi. L. Rev. 66 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wexler & Scoville, The Administration of Psychiatric Justice: Theory and Practice in Arizona, 13 Ariz. L. Rev. 1, 154-58 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ennis, Civil Liberties and Mental Illness, 7 Crim. L. Bull. 101 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischhoff, The Silly Certainty of Hindsight, 8 Psychology Today 71 (April, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Note, Constitutional Standards for Release of the Civilly Committed and Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Strict Scrutiny Analysis, 20 Ariz. L. Rev. 233 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vargas, Rights: A Behavioristic Analysis, 3 Behaviorism 178 (Fall, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldiamond, Toward a Constructional Approach to Social Problems, 2 Behaviorism 60 (Spring, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wexler, D.B. (1981). The Criminal Commitment System. In: Mental Health Law. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3827-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics