Skip to main content

Therapeutic Justice

An Overview and a Discussion of Civil Commitment Standards and Procedures

  • Chapter
Mental Health Law

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology ((PILP,volume 4))

Abstract

The criminal justice system and related mechanisms of social and legal control are today experiencing a period of marked doctrinal and philosophical tension. Actually, the tension is not new, and the current conflict simply marks the latest phase—with a somewhat modern twist—of the tug-of-war between the “classical criminology” (a blending of Kantian retributive justice and the utilitarianism of Cesare di Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham) and the “deterministic criminology” of Enrico Ferri.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Goodall, Shapers at Work, 6 Psychology Today, 53 (Nov., 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Livermore, Malmquist, & Meehl, On the Justifications for Civil Commitment, 117 U. PA. L. Rev. 75, 80 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morse, Crazy Behavior, Morals and Science: An Analysis of Mental Health Law, 51 So. Calif. L. Rev. 527 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan, The Role of the Law in Drug Control, 1971 Duke L. J. 1065, 1071–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Szasz, The Sane Slave: An Historical Note on the Use of Medical Diagnosis as Justificatory Rhetoric, 25 Am. J. Psychotherapy 228 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Note, The Disguised Oppression of Involuntary Guardianship: Have the Elderly Freedom to Spend?, 73 Yale L. J. 676 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wexler, Scoville etal., The Administration of Psychiatric Justice: Theory and Practice in Arizona, 13 Ariz. L. Rev. 1, 20 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Note, Conditioning and Other Technologies Used to “Treat?” “Rehabilitate?” “Demolish?” Prisoners and Mental Patients, 45 S. Cal. L. Rev. 616, 617 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwitzgebel, Limitations on the Coercive Treatment of Offenders, 8 Crim. L. Bull. 267, 286 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wexler, Of Rights and Reinforcers, 11 San Diego L. Rev. 957 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce, Tokens for Recovery, 66 Am. J. Nursing 1799, 1800-01 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glicksman, Ottomanelli, & Cutler, The Earn-Your-Way Credit System: Use of a Token Economy in Narcotic Rehabilitation, 6 Int’l J. Of The Addictions 525 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Narrol, Experimental Application of Reinforcement Principles to the Analysis and Treatment of Hospitalized Alcoholics, 28 Q. J. Studies On Alcohol 105 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schwitzgebel, Limitations on the Coercive Treatment of Offenders, 8 Crim L. Bull. 267 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazdin & Bootzin, The Token Economy: An Evaluative Review, 5 J. Applied Behavior Analysis 343 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwitzgebel, Limitations on the Coercive Treatment of Offenders, 8 Crim. L. Bull. 267, 279 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Breggin, The Return of Lobotomy and Psychosurgery, 118 Cong. Rec. E. 14601 (daily ed. Feb. 24, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Breggin, Psychosurgery for Control of Violence, 118 Cong. Rec. E. 3380 (daily ed. March 30, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson & Szurek, Etiology of Antisocial Behavior in Delinquents and Psychopaths, 154 J.A.M.A. 814 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Savoy, Towards a New Politics of Legal Education, 79 Yale L. J. 444, 497-99 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Note, Criminal Liability of Parents for Failure to Control Their Children, 6 Valparaiso L. Rev. 332 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thome, Tharp, & Wetzel, Behavior Modification Techniques: New Tools for Probation Officers, 31 Fed. Prob. 21 (June, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy, Criminal Punishment and Psychiatric Fallacies, 4 Law & Soc. Rev. 111, 115 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Note, Due Process for the Narcotic Addict? The New York Compulsory Commitment Procedures, 43 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1172 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poythress, Psychiatric Expertise in Civil CommitmentTraining Attorneys to Cope with Expert Testimony, 2 L. & Human Beh. 1 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen, The Functioning of the Attorney and the Commitment of the Mentally 44, 44 Texas L. Rev. 424 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fixsen, Phillips, & Wolf, Achievement Place: Experiments in Self-Government with Pre-Delinquents, 6 J. Applied Behavior Analysis 31 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf, Phillips, Fixsen et al, Achievement Place: The Teaching-Family Model, 5 Child Care Quarterly 92 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Andenaes, The General Preventive Effects of Punishment, 114 U. Pa. La Rev. 949 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chappel, Geis, & Hardt, Explorations in Deterrence and Criminal Justice, 8 Crim. L. Bull. 514 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schwitzgebel, Book Review, 36 Fed. Prob. 66 (March, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Larsen, A Prisoner Looks at Writ-Writing, 56 Calif. Law Rev. 343 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rothaus, Hanson, Cleveland, & Johnson, Describing Psychiatric Hospitalization: A Dilemma, 18 Am. Psychologist 85 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rothaus & Hanson, The Path of Inquiry in Mental Illness and Problem Centered Self-Description, 1 Commun. Ment. Health J. 29 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sykes & Matza, Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency, 22 Am. Sociol. Rev. 664 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rotter, External Control and Internal Control, 5 Psychology Today 37 (June, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brice & Sassenrath, Effects of Locus of Control, Task Instructions, and Belief on Expectancy of Success, 104 J. Social Psychology 97 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenthal, Partial Prohibition of Nonmedical Use of Mind-Altering Drugs: Proposals for Change, 16 Houston L. Rev. 603 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz, Social Factors in the Development of Legal Control: A Case Study of Two Israeli Settlements, 63 Yale L. J. 471 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Robertson, The Law of Institutional Review Boards, 26 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 484 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chambers, Alternatives to Civil Commitment of the Mentally Ill: Practical Guides and Constitutional Imperatives, 70 Mich L. Rev. 1107 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dershowitz, The Psychiatrist’s Power in Civil Commitment: A Knife That Cuts Both Ways, 2 Psychology Today 43, Feb., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cocozza & Steadman, The Failure of Psychiatric Predictions of Dangerousness: Clear and Convincing Evidence, 29 Rutgers L. Rev. 1084 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ennis & Litwack, Psychiatry and the Presumption of Expertise: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom, 63 Calif. L. Rev. 693 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dix, Administration of the Texas Death Penalty Statutes: Constitutional Infirmities Related to the Prediction of Dangerousness, 55 Texas L. Rev. 1343 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  46. American Psychiatric Association, Position Statement on Involuntary Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill, 128 Am. J. Psychiatry 1480 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dershowitz, The Law of Dangerousness: Some Fictions about Predictions, 23 J. Legal Educ. 24 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Note, Civil Commitment of Narcotic Addicts, 76 Yale L.J. 1160, 1179 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Note, Overt Dangerous Behavior as a Constitutional Requirement for Civil Commitment of the Mentally Ill, 44 U. Chi. L. Rev. 562 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aronowitz, Civil Commitment of Narcotic Addicts, 67 Colum. L. Rev. 405 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Robertson, Pre-trial Diversion of Drug Offenders: A Statutory Approach, 52 B. U. L. Rev. 335 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Note, Addict Diversion: An Alternative Approach for the Criminal Justice System, 60 Geo. L.J. 667 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bowden & Langenauer, Success and Failure in the Nara Addiction Program, 128 Am. J. Psychiatry 853, 855 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ennis, Civil Liberties and Mental Illness, 7 Crim. L. Bull. 101, 104 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bejerot, A Theory of Addiction as an Artificially Induced Drive, 128 Am. J. Psychiatry 842, 843 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kramer, The State Versus the Addict: Uncivil Commitment, 50 B. U. L. Rev. 1 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mann, The Behavior-Therapeutic Use of Contingency Contracting to Control an Adult Behavior Problem: Weight Control, 5 J. Applied Behavior Analysis 99 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Szasz, The Ethics of Suicide, 31 Antioch Rev. 7 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Greenberg, Involuntary Psychiatric Commitments to Prevent Suicide, 49 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 227 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wexler, D.B. (1981). Therapeutic Justice. In: Mental Health Law. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3827-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics