Abstract
The necessary secrecy of jury deliberation has limited research on the deliberation process. Instead of dealing with interaction processes that occur as a group develops, jury research has tended to focus on jurors as atomized decision makers who happen to be placed in the same room to make their decisions. Much research which claims to focus on the jury as a group is in reality focusing on jurors as individuals, and on variables which affect these individuals. For example, Gerbasi, Zuckerman, and Reis (1977), in a section on the jury as a group, reviewed studies of the effects of characteristics of individual jurors, such as status, on dependent variables such as foreman selection or dominance of individual jurors. Certainly, Strodtbeck’s (1956) classical work is part of this tradition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arnstein, G. Trial by jury: A new evaluation method. II. The outcome, Phi Delta Kappan, 1975, 57, 188–190.
Bales, R. F. Adaptive and integrative changes as sources of strain in social systems. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965. (a)
Bales, R. F. The equilibrium problem in small groups. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965. (b)
Bennis, W. F., & Shepherd, H. A. A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9, 415–437.
Berman, J., & Sales, B. D. A critical evaluation of the systematic approach to jury selection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1977, 4, 219–240.
Brown, R. Group dynamics. In R. Brown, Social psychology. New York: The Free Press, 1965.
Christie, R. Probability v. precedence: The social psychology of jury selection. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1976.
Devlin, P. Trial by jury. London: Stevens and Sons, 1966.
Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it. Law and Human Behavior, 1977, 1, 163–189.
Farrell, M. P. Patterns in the development of self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12, 523–542.
Forsyth, W. History of trial by jury (2nd ed., prepared by James Appleton Morgan). Jersey City, N.J.: Frederick D. Linn, 1875.
Garvey, C., & Levine, M. Program evaluation: On trial. North Central Association Quarterly, 1976, 50, 359–363.
Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., & Reis, H. T. Justice needs a new blindfold. A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 323–345.
Heinicke, C., & Bales, R. F. Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 1955 (February), 18, 239–253.
Hyman, H. M., & Tarrant, C. M. Aspects of American trial jury history. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975.
Kadane, J., & Lewis, G. The distribution of participation in group discussions: An empirical and theoretical reappraisal. Sociometry, 1969 (October), 32, 710–722.
Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. The American jury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
Kessler, J. B. The social psychology of jury deliberations. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975.
Levine, M. Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts. American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 661–677.
Levine, M., & Rosenberg, N. S. An adversary model of fact finding and decision making for program evaluation: Theoretical considerations. In H. C. Schulberg & F. Baker (Eds.), Program evaluation in the health fields (Vol. I I ). New York: Behavioral Publications, 1979.
Levine, M., Fitzgerald, C., Golplerud, E., Gordon, H. E., Jayne-Lazarus, C., Rosenberg, N., & Slater, J. Adapting the jury trial for program evaluation. A report of an experience. Evaluation and program planning, 1978, 1, 177–186.
Mann, R. Interpersonal styles and group development. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
Mills, T. M. Group transformation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
Nemeth, C. Rules governing jury deliberations: A consideration of recent changes. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1976.
Philip, H., & Dunphy, D. Developmental trends in small groups. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 162–174.
Salisbury, M. R. Judgments of personality in decision-making groups. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Radcliffe College, 1958.
Sangree, L. Laughter in small groups. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1977.
Schulman, J., Kairys, D., Harring, S., Bonora, B., & Christie, R. Systematic jury selection. Law and Psychology Review, 1976, 2, 31–42.
Simon, R. J. The jury and the defense of insanity. Toronto, Ontario: Little, Brown of Canada, 1967.
Stephan, F., & Mischler, E. The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 598–6608.
Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 1956, 19, 3–11.
Timothy, M. Jury woman. Palo Alto, Calif.: Empty Press, 1974.
Tuckman, B. W. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384–399.
Wolf, R. Trial by jury: A new evaluation method. I. The process. Phi Delta Kappan, 1975, 57, 185–187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levine, M., Farrell, M.P., Perrotta, P. (1981). The Impact of Rules of Jury Deliberation on Group Developmental Processes. In: Sales, B.D. (eds) The Trial Process. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3769-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3767-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive