Skip to main content

The Impact of Rules of Jury Deliberation on Group Developmental Processes

  • Chapter
The Trial Process

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology ((PILP,volume 2))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

The necessary secrecy of jury deliberation has limited research on the deliberation process. Instead of dealing with interaction processes that occur as a group develops, jury research has tended to focus on jurors as atomized decision makers who happen to be placed in the same room to make their decisions. Much research which claims to focus on the jury as a group is in reality focusing on jurors as individuals, and on variables which affect these individuals. For example, Gerbasi, Zuckerman, and Reis (1977), in a section on the jury as a group, reviewed studies of the effects of characteristics of individual jurors, such as status, on dependent variables such as foreman selection or dominance of individual jurors. Certainly, Strodtbeck’s (1956) classical work is part of this tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnstein, G. Trial by jury: A new evaluation method. II. The outcome, Phi Delta Kappan, 1975, 57, 188–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. Adaptive and integrative changes as sources of strain in social systems. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. The equilibrium problem in small groups. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. F., & Shepherd, H. A. A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J., & Sales, B. D. A critical evaluation of the systematic approach to jury selection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1977, 4, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. Group dynamics. In R. Brown, Social psychology. New York: The Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. Probability v. precedence: The social psychology of jury selection. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, P. Trial by jury. London: Stevens and Sons, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it. Law and Human Behavior, 1977, 1, 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. P. Patterns in the development of self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12, 523–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, W. History of trial by jury (2nd ed., prepared by James Appleton Morgan). Jersey City, N.J.: Frederick D. Linn, 1875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C., & Levine, M. Program evaluation: On trial. North Central Association Quarterly, 1976, 50, 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., & Reis, H. T. Justice needs a new blindfold. A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinicke, C., & Bales, R. F. Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 1955 (February), 18, 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. M., & Tarrant, C. M. Aspects of American trial jury history. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J., & Lewis, G. The distribution of participation in group discussions: An empirical and theoretical reappraisal. Sociometry, 1969 (October), 32, 710–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. The American jury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, J. B. The social psychology of jury deliberations. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts. American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 661–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., & Rosenberg, N. S. An adversary model of fact finding and decision making for program evaluation: Theoretical considerations. In H. C. Schulberg & F. Baker (Eds.), Program evaluation in the health fields (Vol. I I ). New York: Behavioral Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Fitzgerald, C., Golplerud, E., Gordon, H. E., Jayne-Lazarus, C., Rosenberg, N., & Slater, J. Adapting the jury trial for program evaluation. A report of an experience. Evaluation and program planning, 1978, 1, 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. Interpersonal styles and group development. New York: John Wiley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. M. Group transformation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C. Rules governing jury deliberations: A consideration of recent changes. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, H., & Dunphy, D. Developmental trends in small groups. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, M. R. Judgments of personality in decision-making groups. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Radcliffe College, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangree, L. Laughter in small groups. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, J., Kairys, D., Harring, S., Bonora, B., & Christie, R. Systematic jury selection. Law and Psychology Review, 1976, 2, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. J. The jury and the defense of insanity. Toronto, Ontario: Little, Brown of Canada, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, F., & Mischler, E. The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 598–6608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 1956, 19, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, M. Jury woman. Palo Alto, Calif.: Empty Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R. Trial by jury: A new evaluation method. I. The process. Phi Delta Kappan, 1975, 57, 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levine, M., Farrell, M.P., Perrotta, P. (1981). The Impact of Rules of Jury Deliberation on Group Developmental Processes. In: Sales, B.D. (eds) The Trial Process. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3769-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3767-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics