Abstract
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have become widely accepted in recent years in diagnostic schemes for the assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS). It has been shown that for this purpose a deviation in latency is a better criterion than a deviation in amplitude, since amplitude varies widely among subjects, whereas EP latency, especially with contrast stimulation, remains restricted to a rather narrow range. The latency of the EP to stimulation with a reversing checkerboard pattern appears to be increased in 268 out of 393 (= 68%) MS patients (Halliday et al., 1973: 49/51 = 96%; Asselman et al., 1975: 34/51 = 61%; Mastaglia et al., 1976: 34/68 = 50%; Regan et al., 1976: 6/13 = 46%; Lowitsch et al., 1976: 98/135 = 73%; Hennerici et al., 1977: 35/57 = 61%; Duwaer and Spekreijse, 1978: 12/18 = 67%). However, latency increases are not specific for multiple sclerosis since they have also been observed in patients with a variety of other pathologies (Assesman et al., 1975; Halliday et al., 1976). Furthermore, an increased EP latency cannot always be ascribed to an increased conductance time due to demyelination of the optic nerve fibers since a variety of modifications in the stimulus situation — modifications which might also be induced by the presence of pathologies in the subject — may result in an increased EP latency (Duwaer and Spekreijse, 1978).Some examples are given in Fig. 1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asselman, P., Chadwick, D.W. and Marsden, C.D. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosisBrain, 197598, 261–282.
Duwaer, A.L. and Spekreijse, H. Latency of luminance and contrast evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Electroen- ceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1978,45 244–258.
Halliday, A.M., Halliday, E., Kriss, A., McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. The pattern evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 1976, 99, 357–374.
Halliday, A.M., McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. Visual evoked response in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Brit. Med. J., 1973, IV, 661–664.
Hennerici, M., Wenzel, D. and Freud, H.J. The comparison of small size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain, 1977, 100, 119–136.
Lowitsch, K., Kuhnt, U., Sakmann, Ch., Maurer, K., Hopf, H.C.,Schott, D. and Tater, K. Visual pattern evoked responses and blink responses in assessment of MS diagnosis. (A clinical study of 135 Multiple Sclerosis patients.) J. Neurol., 1976, 213, 17–32.
Mastaglia, F.L., Black, J.L. and Collins, D.W.K. Visual and spinal evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Brit. Med. J., 1976, VI, 732.
McAlpine, E., Lumsden, C.E. and Acheson, E.D. Multiple Sclerosis, Edinburgh: Livingstone, SSS 1965.
McDonald, W.I. and Sears, T.A. Effect of demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. Nature, 1969, 221, 182–183.
Ogden, T.E. and Miller, R.F. Studies of the optic nerve of the rhesus monkey: Nerve fiber spectriam and physiological properties. Vis. Res., 1966, 6 455–506.
Rasminsky, M. and Sears, T.A. Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibers. J. Physiol., 1972, 227, 323–350.
Regan, D., Milner, B.A. and Heron, J.R. Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis. Brain,197699, 43–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spekreijse, H., Duwaer, A.L., Meyjes, F.E.P. (1979). Contrast Evoked Potentials and Psychophysics in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. In: Lehmann, D., Callaway, E. (eds) Human Evoked Potentials. NATO Conference Series, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3483-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3483-5_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3485-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3483-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive