Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Phenol Water and Rantz and Randall Teichoic Acid Antigens in Group H Streptococci

  • Chapter
Secretory Immunity and Infection

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 107))

Abstract

The Group H antigen which is found in most strains of Streptococcus sanguis is usually extracted by the Rantz and Randall (RR) autoclave method (1). Previous studies had suggested that this antigen was a glycerol teichoic acid (2). Although the RR extracts of a variety of streptococcal Lancefield groups indicated the specificity of the Group H antigen (3), a reaction of identity was obtained when phenol water (PW) preparations of Group D streptococci were tested against Group H antisera (1); Group D antisera did not show this cross reaction with either PW or RR extracts of Group H organisms. These results suggested that the RR and PW extractions affected the cells differently. Both of these methods are important starting points in many procedures for antigen purification and for serological identification. Although the PW method is known to disrupt both covalent and non-covalent bonds (4), the effect of the RR extraction on cells is still the subject of much debate. Moreover, though PW extracts are known to solubilize membrane associated lipoteichoic acids (LTA), the effects on other cell surface components are not known (5–8). The structures affected by the RR procedure have still not been identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rantz, L. A. and Randall, E., Stanford Med. Bull. 13: 290, 1955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosan, B. and Knox, K. W., ASM Abstracts, p. 71, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosan, B., Infect. Immun. 7: 205, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang, J. C., Wang, C. S. and Alanpovic, P., J. Bacteriol. 117: 786, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wicken, A. J., Gibbens, J. W. and Knox, K. W., J. Bacteriol. 113: 365, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wicken, A. J. and Knox, K. W., J. Gen. Microbiol. 60: 293, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toon, P., Brown, P. E. and Baddiley, J., Biochem. J. 127: 399, 1972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooley, J., Duckworth, M. and Baddiley, J., J. Gen. Microbiol. 73: 587, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosari, B., Infect. Immun. 13: 1144, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coykendall, A. L. and Specht, P. A., J. Gen. Microbiol. 91: 92, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kabat, E. A. and Mayer, M. M. DUNG in Experimental Immunochemistry, 2nd Ed., C. C. Thomas, Springfield, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, P. S., Toribara, T. Y. and Warner, H., Anal. Chem. 28: 1756, 1956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffman, G., Kabat, E. A. and Thompson, W., Biochem. 3: 587, 1964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sawardeker, J. S., Sloneker, J. H. and Jeanes, A., Anal. Chem. 37: 1602, 1965.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wicken, A. J. and Knox, K. W., Infect. Immun. 11: 973, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wicken, A. J., Elliot, S. D. and Baddiley, J., J. Gen. Microbiol. 31: 231, 1963.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Slade, H. D. and Slamp, W. C., J. Bacteriol. 84: 345, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mukasa, H. and Slade, H. D., Infect. Immun. 8: 190, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosan, B., unpublished observations.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chiu, T. H., Emdur, L. I. and Platt, D., J. Bacteriol. 118: 471, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McIntire, F., personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosan, B. and Knox, K. W., unpublished observations.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salton, M. R., DUNG in The Bacterial Cell Wall, Elsevier, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cleveland, R. F., Holtje, J. V., Wicken, A. J., Tomasz, A., Daneo-Moore, L. and Shockman, G. D., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67: 1128, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Joseph, R. and Shockman, G. D., Infect. Immun. 12: 333, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Markham, J. L., Knox, K. W., Wicken, A. J. and Hewett, M. J., Infect. Immun. 12: 378, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knox, K. W. and Wicken, A. J., this Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rosan, B., unpublished observations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosan, B. (1978). A Comparison of the Phenol Water and Rantz and Randall Teichoic Acid Antigens in Group H Streptococci. In: McGhee, J.R., Mestecky, J., Babb, J.L. (eds) Secretory Immunity and Infection. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 107. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3369-2_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3369-2_89

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3371-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3369-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics