On the Introduction of Disulfide Crosslinks into Fibrous Proteins and Bovine Serum Albumin

  • Ch. Ebert
  • G. Ebert
  • H. Knipp
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 86A)


Hydroxyl groups in serine side chains of collagen, silk fibroin, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were converted to SH by tosylation. in collagen film, 50% of the serine OH groups could be thiolated at most. in fibroin, only 13% because of its compact β-pleated sheet structure and low susceptibility to swelling. The SH groups introduced are near enough together to form -S-S- bonds by oxidation. the residual SH content after oxidation was 0.1% in collagen and 0.03 to 0.25% in fibroin. Disulfide crosslinking increased the shrinkage temperature of collagen and fibroin and decreased the amount of shrinkage. BSA was crosslinked to dimers (MBSA) according to gel permeation chromatography and sedimentation analysis by the analytical centrifuge. Because these crosslinked proteins can be metabolized by the usual processes, in contrast to those crosslinked by artificial, nonphysiological bridges, they may be used for biological or medical purposes.


Bovine Serum Albumin Silk Fibroin Collagen Film Sodium Methylate LiBr Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zervas, L. and Photaki, I, (1960). Chimia, 13, 375.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Struhmeyer, D.H., White, W.N. and Koshland, D.E., Jr. (1963). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 50, 931. Weiner, H., White, W.N. and Koshland, D.E., Jr. (1966). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Photaki, I. and Bardakos, N. (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 3489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Polgar, L. and Bender, M.L. (1966). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 3153. Biochemistry, 6, 610 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwenker, R.F., Jr., Lifland, L. and Pascu, E. (1962). Text. Res. J., 32, 797; ibid. 33, 107 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakamoto, M., Yamada, Y. and Tonami, H. (1969). J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 13, 1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ebert, Ch. (1971). Thesis, Marburg, West GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knipp, H. (1976). Thesis, Marburg, West Germany.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams, E.J. and Foster, J.F. (1960). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 3741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Putnam, F. (1965). In “The Proteins”, Vol. III, p. 153, Second Edition, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellman, G.L. (1959). Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 82, 70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bro, P., Singer, S.T. and Sturtevant, J.M. (1958). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Ebert
    • 1
  • G. Ebert
    • 1
  • H. Knipp
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PolymersUniversity of Marburg/LMarburg/LWest Germany

Personalised recommendations