Abstract
To search for the phylogenesis of foreign tissue graft rejection we have utilized the common garden earthworm extensively. Whereas earthworms never destroy self-tissue or autografts, they are fully capable of rejecting foreign or not-self tissue allografts (1–5) or xenografts (6). At 15°C, single first-set xenografts exchanged between Lumbricus terrestris and Eisenia foetidaare destroyed at approximately 25–35 days. After a first-set graft is destroyed at 15°C, immunologic memory is demonstrable by regrafting the hosts with a second transplant from the original donor of the first-graft. Both positive and negative memory are demonstrable. Positive memory occurs when second-set transplants are rejected significantly faster than first-sets. By contrast, a lesser percentage of worms have grafts that show prolonged survival indicating negative memory. However, if repeat second-sets are performed at 15°C, five days after transplanting a first-set, during the induction phase of the immune response, there is no dissociation into positive and negative memory. Instead, both first- and second-set grafts are destroyed faster than a single graft (7). It appears therefore that at the evolutionary level of annelid worms, foreign transplant rejection is specific and the mechanism includes a memory component. Memory is one characteristic of adaptive immunity as defined for vertebrates (8).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Valembois, P., C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 257: 3489–3490 (1963).
Duprat, P., C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 259: 4177–4180 (1964).
Cooper, E. L., Am. Zool., 5: 254 (1965).
Cooper, E. L., J. Exptl. Zool., 171: 69–73 (1969a).
Cooper, E. L. and Rubilotta, L. M., Transplantation, 8: 220–223 (1969).
Cooper, E. L., Transplantation, 6: 322–337 (1968).
Cooper, E. L., Science, 166: 1414–1415 (1969b).
Hildemann, W. H. and Reddy, A. L., Fed. Proc., 32: 2188–2194 (1973).
Hostetter, R. K. and Cooper, E. L., Immunol. Comm., 1: 155–183 (1972).
Hostetter, R. K. and Cooper, E. L., Cell. Immun., 9: 384–392 (1973).
Winger, L. A. and Cooper, E. L., Am. Zool., 9: 352 (1969).
Burnet, F. M., Nature, 218: 426–430 (1968).
Burnet, F. M., Immunological Surveillance (Pergamon, Oxford, London, New York, Toronto, Sydney, 1970).
Cooper, E. L., in Phylogeny of Immunity (Blackwell Oxford, in press, 1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, E.L. (1975). Characteristics of Cell-Mediated Immunity and Memory in Annelids. In: Hildemann, W.H., Benedict, A.A. (eds) Immunologic Phylogeny. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 64. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3261-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3261-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3263-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3261-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive