Abstract
The conceptual basis for this consideration of research design in the interrelationships between physical anthropology, as a discipline, and nutritional status, as a parameter, rests on the assumption that the morphology and body composition of the individual, and the biomass of a population, are functions of the quantity, the quality, and the utilization of the diets of its members. While there are other determinants that contribute to the above features, and that prevent a simplistic application of resulting data, the use of measurements as indicators of the nutritional adequacy of a group has been shown to be of sufficient utility1–3 to suggest that such an approach be significantly informative under appropriate conditions.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brožek, J., (Ed): Body Measurements and Human Nutrition. Detroit, Wayne Press, 1956.
Jelliffe, D.B.: The assessment of the nutritional status of the community (with special reference to field surveys in developing regions of the world). WHO Monog. Ser., 53:1, 1966.
Kelsay, J.L.: A compendium of nutritional status studies and dietary evaluation studies conducted in the United States, 1957–1967. J. Nutr., 99, Suppl. 1:119, 1969.
Keet, M.P., Hansen, J.D.L. and Truswell, A.S.: Are skinfold measurements of value in the assessment of suboptimal nutrition in young children? Pediatrics, 45:965, 1970.
Dobbing, J.: Undernutrition and the developing brain, p. 241. In: Himwich, W.A. (Ed) Developmental Neurobiology. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, 1970.
Holland, W.W.: Principles of study design, p. 45. In: Holland, W.W. (Ed) Data Handling in Epidemiology. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1970.
Tanner, J.M.: Growth at Adolescence. Second edition. Oxford, Blackwell Sci. Publ., 1962.
Goldstein, H.: Longitudinal studies and the measurement of change. The Statistician, 18:93, 1968.
Susser, M.: Casual Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies of Epidemiology. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1973.
Campbell, D.T.: From description to experimentation: interpreting trends as quasi-experiments, p. 212. In: Harris, C.W. (Ed) Problems in Measuring Change. Madison, Univ. Wisconsin Press, 1963.
Boas, F.: Changes in bodily form of decendants ofimmigrants (1910–1913), p. 60. In: Boas, F. (Ed) Race, Language, and Culture. New York, Macmillan Co., 1940.
Kaplan, B.A.: Environment and human plasticity. Amer. Anthrop., 56:780, 1954.
Hulse, F.S.: Exogamie et hétérosis. Arch. Suisse d’Anthrop., 22:103, 1957.
Froehlich, J.W.: Migration and the plasticity of physique in the Japanese-Americans of Hawaii. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 32:429, 1970.
Dreizen, S., Spirakis, C.N. and Stone, R.E.: A comparison of skeletal growth and maturation in undernourished and wellnourished girls before and after menarche. J. Pediatr., 70:256, 1967.
Hamill, P.V.V., Johnston, F.E. and Lemeshow, S.: Height and Weight of Youths 12–17 Years, United States. DHEW Pub. 73–1606, Ser. 11, No. 124. Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc., 1973.
Boas, F.: Remarks on the Anthropological Study of Children. Trans.15th Internat. Cong. Hygiene and Demog., Washington, D. C., 1913.
Shuttleworth, F.K.: The Physical and Mental Growth of Girls and Boys Age 6 to 19 in Relation to Age at Maximum Growth. Monog. Soc. Res. Child Develop., 4, 1939.
Johnston, F.E., Borden, M. and MacVean, R.B.: Height, weight and their growth velocities in Guatemalan private school children of high socioeconomic class. Human Biol., 45:627, 1973.
Scott, J.A.: Report on the heights and weights (and other measurements) of school pupils in the county of London in 1959. London, London County Council, 1959.
National Center for Health Statistics: Plan, Operation, and Response Results of a Program of Children’s Examinations. PHS Pub. No. 1000, Ser. 1, No. 5. Washington, D. C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc, 1967.
Hallman, N., Bäckström, L., Kantero, R.L. and Tiisala, R.: Studies on Growth of Finnish Children from Birth to Ten Years. Acta Paediat. Scand., Suppl. 220, 1971.
Tiisala, R. and Kantero, R.L.: Comparison of height and weight distance curves based on longitudinal and cross-sectional series from birth to ten years. Acta Paediat. Scand., Suppl. 220, 1971.
Linden, F.P.G.M. van der: The interpretation of incremental data and velocity growth curves. Growth, 34:221, 1970.
Menken, J.A. and Sheps, M.C.: On relationships between longitudinal characteristics and cross-sectional data. Amer. J. Public Health, 60: 1506, 1970.
Meredith, H.V.: On the distribution of anatomic increment data in early childhood. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 20:519, 1962.
Garn, S.M. and Rohmann, C.G.: On the prevalence of skewness in incremental data. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 21:235, 1963.
Tanner, J.M.: Some notes on the reporting of growth data. Human Biol., 23:93, 1951.
Johnston, F.E., Hamill, P.V.V. and Lemeshow, S.: Skinfold thickness of children 6–11 years, United States. DHEW Pub. 73–1602, Ser. 11, No. 120. Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc, 1972.
Deming, J. and Washburn, A.H.: Application of the Jenss curve to the observed pattern of growth during the first eight years of life in forty boys and forty girls. Human Biol., 35:484, 1963.
Murray, J.R., Wiley, D.E. and Wolfe, R.G.: New statistical techniques for evaluating longitudinal models. Hum. Dev., 14:142, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnston, F.E. (1974). Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Studies. In: Roche, A.F., Falkner, F. (eds) Nutrition and Malnutrition. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 49. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3252-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3252-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3254-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3252-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive