Skip to main content

Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Studies

  • Chapter
Nutrition and Malnutrition

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 49))

Abstract

The conceptual basis for this consideration of research design in the interrelationships between physical anthropology, as a discipline, and nutritional status, as a parameter, rests on the assumption that the morphology and body composition of the individual, and the biomass of a population, are functions of the quantity, the quality, and the utilization of the diets of its members. While there are other determinants that contribute to the above features, and that prevent a simplistic application of resulting data, the use of measurements as indicators of the nutritional adequacy of a group has been shown to be of sufficient utility1–3 to suggest that such an approach be significantly informative under appropriate conditions.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brožek, J., (Ed): Body Measurements and Human Nutrition. Detroit, Wayne Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jelliffe, D.B.: The assessment of the nutritional status of the community (with special reference to field surveys in developing regions of the world). WHO Monog. Ser., 53:1, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelsay, J.L.: A compendium of nutritional status studies and dietary evaluation studies conducted in the United States, 1957–1967. J. Nutr., 99, Suppl. 1:119, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keet, M.P., Hansen, J.D.L. and Truswell, A.S.: Are skinfold measurements of value in the assessment of suboptimal nutrition in young children? Pediatrics, 45:965, 1970.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobbing, J.: Undernutrition and the developing brain, p. 241. In: Himwich, W.A. (Ed) Developmental Neurobiology. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, W.W.: Principles of study design, p. 45. In: Holland, W.W. (Ed) Data Handling in Epidemiology. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanner, J.M.: Growth at Adolescence. Second edition. Oxford, Blackwell Sci. Publ., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, H.: Longitudinal studies and the measurement of change. The Statistician, 18:93, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Susser, M.: Casual Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies of Epidemiology. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, D.T.: From description to experimentation: interpreting trends as quasi-experiments, p. 212. In: Harris, C.W. (Ed) Problems in Measuring Change. Madison, Univ. Wisconsin Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boas, F.: Changes in bodily form of decendants ofimmigrants (1910–1913), p. 60. In: Boas, F. (Ed) Race, Language, and Culture. New York, Macmillan Co., 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan, B.A.: Environment and human plasticity. Amer. Anthrop., 56:780, 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hulse, F.S.: Exogamie et hétérosis. Arch. Suisse d’Anthrop., 22:103, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Froehlich, J.W.: Migration and the plasticity of physique in the Japanese-Americans of Hawaii. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 32:429, 1970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dreizen, S., Spirakis, C.N. and Stone, R.E.: A comparison of skeletal growth and maturation in undernourished and wellnourished girls before and after menarche. J. Pediatr., 70:256, 1967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamill, P.V.V., Johnston, F.E. and Lemeshow, S.: Height and Weight of Youths 12–17 Years, United States. DHEW Pub. 73–1606, Ser. 11, No. 124. Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boas, F.: Remarks on the Anthropological Study of Children. Trans.15th Internat. Cong. Hygiene and Demog., Washington, D. C., 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shuttleworth, F.K.: The Physical and Mental Growth of Girls and Boys Age 6 to 19 in Relation to Age at Maximum Growth. Monog. Soc. Res. Child Develop., 4, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnston, F.E., Borden, M. and MacVean, R.B.: Height, weight and their growth velocities in Guatemalan private school children of high socioeconomic class. Human Biol., 45:627, 1973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, J.A.: Report on the heights and weights (and other measurements) of school pupils in the county of London in 1959. London, London County Council, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Center for Health Statistics: Plan, Operation, and Response Results of a Program of Children’s Examinations. PHS Pub. No. 1000, Ser. 1, No. 5. Washington, D. C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hallman, N., Bäckström, L., Kantero, R.L. and Tiisala, R.: Studies on Growth of Finnish Children from Birth to Ten Years. Acta Paediat. Scand., Suppl. 220, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tiisala, R. and Kantero, R.L.: Comparison of height and weight distance curves based on longitudinal and cross-sectional series from birth to ten years. Acta Paediat. Scand., Suppl. 220, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Linden, F.P.G.M. van der: The interpretation of incremental data and velocity growth curves. Growth, 34:221, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Menken, J.A. and Sheps, M.C.: On relationships between longitudinal characteristics and cross-sectional data. Amer. J. Public Health, 60: 1506, 1970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Meredith, H.V.: On the distribution of anatomic increment data in early childhood. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 20:519, 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Garn, S.M. and Rohmann, C.G.: On the prevalence of skewness in incremental data. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 21:235, 1963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanner, J.M.: Some notes on the reporting of growth data. Human Biol., 23:93, 1951.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston, F.E., Hamill, P.V.V. and Lemeshow, S.: Skinfold thickness of children 6–11 years, United States. DHEW Pub. 73–1602, Ser. 11, No. 120. Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deming, J. and Washburn, A.H.: Application of the Jenss curve to the observed pattern of growth during the first eight years of life in forty boys and forty girls. Human Biol., 35:484, 1963.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Murray, J.R., Wiley, D.E. and Wolfe, R.G.: New statistical techniques for evaluating longitudinal models. Hum. Dev., 14:142, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnston, F.E. (1974). Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Studies. In: Roche, A.F., Falkner, F. (eds) Nutrition and Malnutrition. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 49. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3252-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3252-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3254-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3252-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics