Abstract
Although the rigorous hydrodynamic theories of channel boiling [1] and of pool boiling [2] were published in the same year, the latter has subsequently been thoroughly discussed and documented [3–5] while the former has not: Only three groups [1,6,7] have compared the channel boiling theory with adequate experiments and two of these are said to be in serious conflict. It is a purpose of this presentation to point out that this disagreement can be resolved if correct values of vapor density are used in the calculations. A second purpose is to add further support for the theory by a comparison with the more recent and extensive hydrogen forced flow film boiling data of Hendricks et al.[8]. The fit of data on boiling helium is discussed elsewhere [9]. Many studies [10–12] of boiling of other cryogens lack data on increase in quality or pressure drop or other information needed for a direct comparison with the hydrodynamic theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. G. Sydoriak and T. R. Roberts, J. Appl. Phys., 28: 143 (1957).
N. Zuber, Trans. ASME, 80: 711 (1958).
N. Zuber, “Hydrodynamic Aspects of Boiling Heat Transfer,” AECU-4439 (1959).
N. Zuber, M. Tribus, and J. W. Westwater, in: Proc. Intern. Conf. Heat Transfer, ASME, New York (1961), p. 230.
L. S. Tong, Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow, Wiley, New York (1965), pp. 22–36.
R. J. Richards, R. F. Robbins, R. B. Jacobs, and D. C. Holten, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 3, Springer Science+Business Media New York (1960), p. 375.
C. Johannes and J. Mollard, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 17, Springer Science+Business Media New York (1972), p. 332.
R. C. Hendricks, R. W. Graham, Y. Y. Hsu, and R. Friedman, NASA Tech. Note D-765 and D-3095, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio (1961 and 1966 ).
S. G. Sydoriak, “Hydrodynamic Theory Correlation for 73 Helium Evaporators” paper presented at 13th Intern. Low-Temperature Physics Conference, August 21–25, 1972, Boulder, Colorado; also Los Alamos Report LA-DC-72–785 (1972).
E. G. Brentari, P. J. Giarratano, and R. V. Smith, NBS Tech. Note 317 (1965).
J. D. Seader, W. S. Miller, and L. A. Kalvinskos, NASA CR-243 (1965).
Y. Y. Hsu, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 17, Springer Science+Business Media New York (1972), p. 361.
S. G. Sydoriak and T. R. Roberts, Bull. Intern. Inst. Refrig.,Annexe 1966–5 p. 115.
R. J. Simoneau and F. F. Simon, “A Visual Study of Velocity and Buoyancy Effects on Boiling Nitrogen,” NASA TND-3354, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio (1966).
S. S. Kulateladze, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekh. Nauk, 4:529 (1951); also in: Heat Transfer in Condensation and Boiling, 2nd ed., State Sci. and Tech. Pub. of Lit. on Machinery, Moscow (1952); AEC Translation 3770, Tech. Inf. Serv., Oak Ridge, Tenn.; also in: Fundamentals of Heat Transfer, translation edited by R. D. Cess, Academic Press, New York (1963).
V. M. Borishanskii, Zh. Tekh. Fiz, 26:452 (1956); English transi.: Soviet Phys.-Tech. Phys., 1: 438 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sydoriak, S.G. (1973). Interpretation and Correlation of Deviations from a Hydrodynamic Channel Boiling Theory of Data on Nitrogen and Hydrogen in Forced and Free Flow Boiling. In: Timmerhaus, K.D. (eds) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3111-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3111-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3113-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3111-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive