Skip to main content

Semantics and Language Acquisition: Some Theoretical Considerations

  • Chapter
Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 4b))

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

Now that developmental psycholinguists have been gradually easing themselves out of the syntactic fixation with which they have been afflicted for some time, they have come face to face with the problem of semantics which is, of course, the heart of any account of language and language acquisition. My plan today is to begin by presenting some reasons for rejecting one theory of semantic development -namely, the Semantic Feature Hypothesis which has stimulated a great deal of research on semantic development including some of my own. Second, I will sketch an alternative theoretical model which may be more satisfactory. The latter theory draws from aspects of my own research, the developmental work of Donaldson and Wales (e.g., 1970) Macnamara (1972), Rosch (e.g., 1973) and Nelson (e.g. 1974), and research reported by Bransford, Franks, Posner and others (e.g. Bransford and McCarrell, 1975; Franks and Bransford, 1971; Posner and Keele, 1968).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bierwisch, M. (1970a). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1970). On classifying semantic features. In M. Bierwisch and K.E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., & McCarrell, N.S. (1975). Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. In W.B. Weimer and D.S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.B., & S alapatek, P. (1975). Infant perception: From sensation to cognition. Vol. I & II-New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M., & Wales, R.J. (1970). On the acquisition of some relational terms. In J.R. Hayes (Ed.) Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach and R.T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D., Fodor, J.A., & Garrett, M.F. (1975)• The psychological unreality of semantics representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J.J., & Bransford, J.D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. J. Exp. Psychol., 90, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychol. Rev., 79, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C.C. Catlin, J., & Rosch, E. (1975). Development of the structure of color categories. Developmental Psychology, 11, 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychol. Rev., 81, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1975). The nominal shift in semantic-syntactic development. Cog. Psychol., 7, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1976). Some attributes of adjectives used by very young children. Cognition, 4, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychol. Rev., 77, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M.J. & Keele, S.W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. Exp. Psychol., 77, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cog. Psychol., 7, 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, S. & Palermo, D.S. (1975). ’In’, ’on’ and ’under’ revisited. Int. J. Cog. Psychol., 3, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palermo, D.S. (1978). Semantics and Language Acquisition: Some Theoretical Considerations. In: Campbell, R.N., Smith, P.T. (eds) Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language. NATO Conference Series, vol 4b. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2532-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2532-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2534-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2532-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics