Skip to main content

Southern Lay Midwives as Ritual Specialists

  • Chapter
Women in Ritual and Symbolic Roles

Abstract

Midwifery in the southeastern United States is closely bound to the feminine reproductive-domestic role and requires specialized ritual, economic, and social behavior. Contemporary Southern lay midwives* are typically elderly black women; all of the midwives discussed here are black and live in rural areas or in towns having populations of less than 10,000 persons. Although the practices and events described here may reflect black-white relations in northern Florida, there is evidence that midwives throughout the United States shared similar experiences when local and state regulations affected their activities (Darlington 1911; Noyes 1912; Kobrin 1966). This presentation examines traditional birth ritual and changes in birth practices and midwifery initiated by state control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Darlington, Thomas. 1911. The present status of the midwife. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 63:870–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Elise and Nicholas J. Eastman. 1960. Zabriskie’s Obstetrics for Nurses. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, Jules O. 1960. A Manual for Midwives. Jacksonville, Florida: Florida State Board of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, John J. 1964. Principles of Public Health Administration. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, Frances E. 1966. The American midwife controversy: A crisis of professionalism. Bulletin of the History of Mediane 40:350–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Fontaine, Joan (ed.). 1972. The Interpretation of Ritual: Essays in Honour of A. I. Richards. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeau, Beatrice. 1973. The “granny” midwives: A study of a folk institution in the process of social disintegration. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeau, Beatrice, H. L. Smith, and A. C. Maney. 1961. The “granny” midwife: Changing roles and functions of a folk practitioner. American Journal of Sociology 66:497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, Clara D. 1912. The training of midwives in relation to the prevention of infant mortality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 66:1051–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southeastern Council on Nurse Midwifery. 1974. Mimeograph report on maternal-infant health. Jackson, Mississippi: University of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dougherty, M.C. (1978). Southern Lay Midwives as Ritual Specialists. In: Hoch-Smith, J., Spring, A. (eds) Women in Ritual and Symbolic Roles. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2400-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2400-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2402-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2400-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics