Skip to main content

The Development of a Pain Perception Profile: A Psychophysical Approach

  • Chapter
Pain

Abstract

Recently I visited the laboratory of a prominent neurologist who is involved in highly sophisticated nerve conduction research. He also maintains a private practice and is much sought after as a specialist and consultant. We talked about his research and he proudly described to me in great detail the complexities of his laboratory equipment, which had the appearance of a miniature space program launch facility. He was very articulate about his ability to manipulate all the physical and experimental variables in his research and took pains to explain how carefully he measured and controlled noise in his recording system. Our conversation finally shifted to my interests and I described some of my ideas about the need for developing methods to evaluate the individual patient’s perception of pain. I asked him how he made such evaluations in his medical practice and what special instruments he used for this purpose. His answer was to reach into his pocket and solemnly produce a large safety pin which he identified, with almost the same amount of pride as he had expressed for his complex laboratory instruments, as his major test instrument in evaluating his patients’ pain sensitivity. I do not have any objection to my friend’s use of the safety pin but, if he is going to use it as a clinical test instrument, I, as a concerned scientist, want to know how the instrument is calibrated. That is, how sharp is the pin and how much force is used to prick the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beecher, H.K. Measurement of subjective responses: quantitative effects of drugs. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.W. & Bindra, D. Individual differences in pain threshold. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 69–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. Sensory-decision theory analysis of the placebo effect on the criterion pain and thermal sensitivity (d’). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 363–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. & Dillon, D.J. SDT analysis of binary decisions and sensory intensity ratings to noxious thermal stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 491–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. & Mehl, L. Thermal pain: a sensory decision theory analysis of the effect of age and sex on d’, various response criteria, and 50% pain threshold. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 78, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. & Yang, J.C. Acupunctural analgesia? Evaluation by signal detection theory. Science, 1974, 184, 1096–1098.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.V. Some technical notes on psychophysical scaling. In H. Moskowitz, B. Scharf & J. C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and measurement: paper in honor of S. S. Stevens. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.V., Tursky, B. & Lodge, M. The role of regression and range effects in determination of the power function for electric shock. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, W.E. & Brinker, R.P. Validation of ratio scales of opinion by multimodality matching. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, W.E. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgione, A.G. & Barber, T.X. A strain gauge pain stimulator. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 102–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., Mellis, I. & Froeberg, J. Effect of electrical stimulation on sensation threshold. Perceptual and Motors Skills, 1967, 24, 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, D.J., Wolff, H.G., & Goodell, H. Pain sensations and reactions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J.D., Tursky, B. & Schwartz, G.E. Shock elicited pain and its reduction by concurrent tactile stimulation. Science, 1971, 172, 866–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H.E., Flanary, H.G., Kornetsky, C.H. & Wikler, A. Relationship of electrically induced pain to the amperage and the wattage of shock stimuli. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1952, 31, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J.D.R. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1951, 985–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., Cross, D., Tursky, B. & Tanenhaus, J. The psychophysical scaling and validation of a political support scale. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 611–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. & Torgerson, W.S. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology, 1971, 34, 50–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D.C. & Tursky, B. Body image, anxiety, and tolerance for experimental pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1967, 29, 103–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price, K.P. & Tursky, B. The effect of varying stimulus parameters on judgments of nociceptive electrical stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12, 663–666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.M., Lowenstein, D. & Beecher, H.K. Experimental pain produced by the submaximum effort tourniquet technique: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1968, 163, 468–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R.A. Pain: a psychophysiological analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R.A., Murphy, R.W., Timmermans, G., Greenhoot, J.H. & Akeson, W. Measuring the severity of clinical pain. Advances in Neurology, 1974, 4, 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. On the psychophysical power function in electric shock. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. Ethnic differences among housewives in psychophysical skin potential responses to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1965, 1, 241–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.C. & Mack, J.D. Scales of apparent force. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 58, 405–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.C. & Marks, L.E. Spatial summation and the dynamics of warmth sensation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.C. & Stevens, S.S. Warmth and cold: dynamics of sensory intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 1961, 133, 80–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S., Carton, A.S. & Shickman, G.M. A scale of apparent intensity of electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 328–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. & Greenbaum, H.B. Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Perception and Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursky, B. Physical, physiological, and psychological factors that affect pain reaction to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11, 95–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tursky, B., Greenblatt, D.J. & O’Connell, D. Electrocutaneous threshold changes produced by electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tursky, B. & O’Connell, D. Reliability and interjudgment predictability of subjective judgments of electrocutaneous stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 290–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tursky, B. (1976). The Development of a Pain Perception Profile: A Psychophysical Approach. In: Weisenberg, M., Tursky, B. (eds) Pain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2304-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2304-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2306-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2304-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics