Abstract
Recently I visited the laboratory of a prominent neurologist who is involved in highly sophisticated nerve conduction research. He also maintains a private practice and is much sought after as a specialist and consultant. We talked about his research and he proudly described to me in great detail the complexities of his laboratory equipment, which had the appearance of a miniature space program launch facility. He was very articulate about his ability to manipulate all the physical and experimental variables in his research and took pains to explain how carefully he measured and controlled noise in his recording system. Our conversation finally shifted to my interests and I described some of my ideas about the need for developing methods to evaluate the individual patient’s perception of pain. I asked him how he made such evaluations in his medical practice and what special instruments he used for this purpose. His answer was to reach into his pocket and solemnly produce a large safety pin which he identified, with almost the same amount of pride as he had expressed for his complex laboratory instruments, as his major test instrument in evaluating his patients’ pain sensitivity. I do not have any objection to my friend’s use of the safety pin but, if he is going to use it as a clinical test instrument, I, as a concerned scientist, want to know how the instrument is calibrated. That is, how sharp is the pin and how much force is used to prick the patient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beecher, H.K. Measurement of subjective responses: quantitative effects of drugs. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Clark, J.W. & Bindra, D. Individual differences in pain threshold. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 69–76.
Clark, W.C. Sensory-decision theory analysis of the placebo effect on the criterion pain and thermal sensitivity (d’). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 363–371.
Clark, W.C. & Dillon, D.J. SDT analysis of binary decisions and sensory intensity ratings to noxious thermal stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 491–493.
Clark, W.C. & Mehl, L. Thermal pain: a sensory decision theory analysis of the effect of age and sex on d’, various response criteria, and 50% pain threshold. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 78, 202–212.
Clark, W.C. & Yang, J.C. Acupunctural analgesia? Evaluation by signal detection theory. Science, 1974, 184, 1096–1098.
Cross, D.V. Some technical notes on psychophysical scaling. In H. Moskowitz, B. Scharf & J. C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and measurement: paper in honor of S. S. Stevens. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974, 23–26.
Cross, D.V., Tursky, B. & Lodge, M. The role of regression and range effects in determination of the power function for electric shock. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 9–14.
Dawson, W.E. & Brinker, R.P. Validation of ratio scales of opinion by multimodality matching. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 413–417.
Fordyce, W.E. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1976.
Forgione, A.G. & Barber, T.X. A strain gauge pain stimulator. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 102–106.
Frankenhaeuser, M., Mellis, I. & Froeberg, J. Effect of electrical stimulation on sensation threshold. Perceptual and Motors Skills, 1967, 24, 271–275.
Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1966.
Hardy, D.J., Wolff, H.G., & Goodell, H. Pain sensations and reactions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1952.
Higgins, J.D., Tursky, B. & Schwartz, G.E. Shock elicited pain and its reduction by concurrent tactile stimulation. Science, 1971, 172, 866–867.
Hill, H.E., Flanary, H.G., Kornetsky, C.H. & Wikler, A. Relationship of electrically induced pain to the amperage and the wattage of shock stimuli. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1952, 31, 261–266.
Licklider, J.D.R. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1951, 985–1039.
Lodge, M., Cross, D., Tursky, B. & Tanenhaus, J. The psychophysical scaling and validation of a political support scale. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 611–649.
Melzack, R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–299.
Melzack, R. & Torgerson, W.S. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology, 1971, 34, 50–59.
Nichols, D.C. & Tursky, B. Body image, anxiety, and tolerance for experimental pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1967, 29, 103–110.
Price, K.P. & Tursky, B. The effect of varying stimulus parameters on judgments of nociceptive electrical stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12, 663–666.
Smith, G.M., Lowenstein, D. & Beecher, H.K. Experimental pain produced by the submaximum effort tourniquet technique: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1968, 163, 468–474.
Sternbach, R.A. Pain: a psychophysiological analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Sternbach, R.A., Murphy, R.W., Timmermans, G., Greenhoot, J.H. & Akeson, W. Measuring the severity of clinical pain. Advances in Neurology, 1974, 4, 281–288.
Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. On the psychophysical power function in electric shock. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 217–218.
Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. Ethnic differences among housewives in psychophysical skin potential responses to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1965, 1, 241–246.
Stevens, J.C. & Mack, J.D. Scales of apparent force. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 58, 405–413.
Stevens, J.C. & Marks, L.E. Spatial summation and the dynamics of warmth sensation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 391.
Stevens, J.C. & Stevens, S.S. Warmth and cold: dynamics of sensory intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 183.
Stevens, S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.
Stevens, S.S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 1961, 133, 80–86.
Stevens, S.S. Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1975.
Stevens, S.S., Carton, A.S. & Shickman, G.M. A scale of apparent intensity of electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 328–334.
Stevens, S.S. & Greenbaum, H.B. Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Perception and Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 439–446.
Tursky, B. Physical, physiological, and psychological factors that affect pain reaction to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11, 95–112.
Tursky, B., Greenblatt, D.J. & O’Connell, D. Electrocutaneous threshold changes produced by electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 490–498.
Tursky, B. & O’Connell, D. Reliability and interjudgment predictability of subjective judgments of electrocutaneous stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 290–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tursky, B. (1976). The Development of a Pain Perception Profile: A Psychophysical Approach. In: Weisenberg, M., Tursky, B. (eds) Pain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2304-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2304-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2306-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2304-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive