Skip to main content

Television Camera Tubes

  • Chapter
Vision

Part of the book series: Optical Physics and Engineering ((OPEG))

  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

At the outset, we recognize an obvious difference between the human visual process and the equivalent electronic camera tube. In the retina, all of the elements transmit their optical information simultaneously to the brain. In the camera tube, the elements are scanned serially at a rate sufficiently high that they appear to the eye to be simultaneous. The camera tube could, in principle, be designed to have all of its picture elements transmit their information simultaneously to the receiver. The resulting system would be cumbersome compared with the conventional scanning systems. There is, however, no fundamental difference in sensitivity to be expected between a simultaneous and a properly designed sequentially scanned system. The scanning process only imposes its own set of technical problems without fundamentally limiting the performance of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P.H. Boerse, “Electron Bombardment Induced Conductivity in Lead Monoxide,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 22A, pp. 305–314 (1966), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.S. Boyle and G.E. Smith, Charge-coupled semiconductor devices, Bell System Tech. J. 49, 587–593 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.E. Carnes and W.F. Kosonocky, Noise sources in charge-coupled devices, RCA Rev,33 327–343 (1972). [See also M.F. Tompsett, The quantitative effects of interface states on the performance of charge coupled devices, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-20 45–55 (1973).]

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.H. Crowell, T.M. Buck, E.F. Labuda, J.V. Dalton, and E.J. Walsh, A camera tube with a silicon diode array target, Bell System Tech. J. 46, 491–495 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.T. Farnsworth, Television by electron-image scanning, J. Franklin Inst. 218, 411–444 (1934).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.V. Forque, R.R. Goodwich, and A.D. Cope, Properties of some photoconductors, principally antimony trisulphide, RCA Rev. 13, 335–349 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.W. Goetz and A.H. Boerio, Secondary electron conduction (SEC) for signal amplification and storage in camera tubes, Proc. IEEE 52, 1007–1012 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Heijne, Photoconductive properties of lead-oxide layers, Philips Res. Repts. Suppl. 4, 1–161 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.A. Iams, G.A. Morton, and V.K. Zworykin, The image iconoscope, Proc. IRE 27, 541–547 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G.A.Morton and J.E. Ruedy, “The Low-Light-Level Performance of the Intensifier Orthicon,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 12, pp. 183–193 (1960), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Pensak, Conductivity induced by electron bombardment in thin insulating films, Phys. Rev. 75, 472–478 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Pensak, Electron-bombardment-induced conductivity in selenium, Phys. Rev. 78, 171 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.L. Rogers, III, G.S. Briggs, W.N. Henry, P.W. Kaseman, R.E. Simon, and R.L. Van Asselt, Silicon-intensifier target camera tube, Int. Coni. on Solid-State Circuits,February 18–20, 1970, Univ. of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rose, Photoconductivity in insulators, RCA Rev. 13, 303–305 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rose and H.A. Lams, The orthicon, a television pickup tube, RCA Rev. 4, 186–199 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Rose, P.K. Weimer, and H.B. Law, The image orthicon—A sensitive television pick-up tube, Proc. IRE 34, 424–432 (1946).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.L. J. Sangster and K. Teer, Bucket-brigade electronics—New possibilities for delay, time-axis conversion, and scanning, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits SC-4, 131–136 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Shimizu and Y. Kiuchi, Characteristics of the new vidicon-type camera tube using CdSe as a target material, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 6, 1089–1095 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S-3. R.E. Simon, private communication (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.K. Weimer, The image isocon—An experimental television pickup tube based on the scattering of low-velocity electrons, RCA Rev. 10, 366–386 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P.K. Weimer, Photoconductivity in amorphous selenium, Phys. Rev. 79, 171 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P.K. Weimer and A.D. Cope, Photoconductivity in amorphous selenium, RCA Rev. 12, 314–334 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.K. Weimer, S.V. Forque, and R.R. Goodrich, The vidicon—photoconductive camera tube, Electronics, May (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  24. P.K. Weimer, W.S. Pike, G. Sadasiv, F.V. Shallcross, and L. Meray-Horvath, Multi-element self-scanned mosaic sensors, IEEE Spectrum 6, 52–65 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. V.K. Zworykin, The iconoscope, Proc. IRE. 22, 16–32 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

General

  • L.N. Biberman and S. Nudelman, Photoelectronic Imaging Devices, Vols. 1 and 2 (1971), Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Clark Jones, “Quantum Efficiency of Detectors for Visible and Infrared Radiation,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 87–183 (1959), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rose, “Television Pickup Tubes and The Problem of Vision,” in Advances in Electronics, Vol. I, pp. 131–166 (1948), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. H. Schade, The resolving-power functions and quantum processes of television camera tubes, RCA Rev. 28, 460–535 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.V. Soule, Electrooptical Photography at Low Illumination Levels (1968), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.K. Weimer, “Television Camera Tubes: A Research Review,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 13, pp. 387–437 (1960), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • V.K. Zworykin and G.A. Morton, Television (1954), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, A. (1973). Television Camera Tubes. In: Vision. Optical Physics and Engineering. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2037-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2037-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2039-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2037-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics