Abstract
In approaching the problem of making a regional tectonic subdivision according to depth (I think it is already clear to the reader that by “depth” we primarily mean the subcrustal zone), we find it possible in practice to use only data for deep-focus earthquakes. The one-sidedness of this information, its obvious incompleteness is the result of inadequate study. To a certain degree the information is random, the result of our lack of information concerning the distribution and change of intensity in frequency of earthquakes of the past. Lastly, we lack knowledge of what quantitative characteristics define in nature delimiting types of regions. It would appear that all these deficiencies compel us to reject any simple regional classification according to intensities of seismic activity. A more fundamental approach would be to distinguish regions according to qualitative change in seismicity with depth. This would essentially lead us to a subdivision of regions according to focal depth of earthquakes. In this case, we distinguish regions according to presence or absence of earthquakes at particular depth intervals. The intervals themselves are determined by composite geologic and, in part, geophysical data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Consultants Bureau, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheinmann, Y.M. (1971). Regional Tectonic Subdivisions According to Depth. In: Tectonics and the Formation of Magmas. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1584-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1584-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1586-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1584-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive