Abstract
Alienation and community are central concepts of the modern political and social sciences. Each term is laden with value implications; each is open to a confusing array of applications. Although many studies and policy papers have employed the community or the neighborhood as their focal point, no single definition of either term has won universal acceptance. Many definitions that work well in a single theoretical construct have proven difficult in practice. The neighborhood has recently been idealized in popular culture as a bygone urban Utopia, suitable for nostalgic reminiscence and panegyric, not as an arena for hardheaded political action. We have a number of useful and/or attractive definitions, none of which may be reliably employed in all circumstances. How one uses the terms obviously depends on what one wishes to do with them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naparstek, A.J., Biegel, D.E., Spiro, H.R. (1982). Alienation and Community. In: Neighborhood Networks for Humane Mental Health Care. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1146-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1146-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1148-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1146-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive