Skip to main content

Interpreting direction from graphic displays: Spatial frames of reference

  • Chapter
Processing of Visible Language

Part of the book series: Nato Conference Series ((HF,volume 13))

  • 508 Accesses

Abstract

Spatial frames of reference are integral to knowing where objects are located in space. Spatial location may be described verbally or graphically. When the cardinal points are used as verbal descriptions, north and south judgments are faster than east and west judgments. This phenomenon is investigated in the first study reported. In a second study, spatialframes of reference are inferredfrom individual graphic descriptions of macrospace. Subjective and objective measures of spatial ability are found to be correlated with individual differences in cognitive mapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bowditch, N. American practical navigator Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology 1972,3, 472–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. M., Sc Stea, D, Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, W. S. Coding left and right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R., Sc Camaione, D. N. Concepts in kinesiology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. Human spatial orientation. London: John Wiley :Sons, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, L. T., Sc Bryant, K.J. Sense of direction, spatial orientation, andcognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977,5, 590–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R. Comprehending compass directions. Memory £sf Cognition 1978,6, 416–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. E. A study of spatial orientation of children./owrna/ of Educational Research 1941,34,481–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. The analysis of sensations. Chicago: Open Court, 1897.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., Grandy, C. A., & Hauge, G. Why is telling right from left moredifficult than telling above from below? fournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979,5, 602–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., Sc Inhelder, B. The child’s conception of space. New York: W. W. Norton Sc Co., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • PhilHps, R.J. Making maps easy to read—a summary of research. In P. A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language 1. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potash, L. M. Design of maps and map-related Yesearch, Human Factors 1977,19 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. H., Sc Petchenick, B. B. The nature of maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, C. C. On fundamental methods of orientation and imaginary maps. Science 1913,28, 888–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenhausern, R. Imagery, cerebral dominance, and style of thinking: A unified field model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1978,12 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sholl, M.J., Egeth, H.E. (1980). Interpreting direction from graphic displays: Spatial frames of reference. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds) Processing of Visible Language. Nato Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1070-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1068-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics