Abstract
The following is a straightforward attempt to answer the question stated in the title and posed by Professor Zichichi in his opening lecture of the School. Its perspective is to some extent historical as is appropriate, in my opinion, for part of an attempt to assess where we are and where we are going in the study of sub-nuclear matter. If there are readers who are not aware of the inherent fallibility of such attempts to learn from history, they should be reminded that the method involved is somewhat reminiscent of that used by the celebrated wise men of Chelm, who, when they wished to record the location of an especially good fishing spot, carefully marked the place on the boat from which they were fishing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
For a more detailed discussion see A.S. Wightman, Mathematical Idealization and Theoretical Physics; The Role of Mathematical Physics, Progress in Scientific Culture 1 (1976) 19.
M. Born, W. Heisenberg and P. Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik II, Z. für Phys. 35 (1925) 606.
P.A.M. Dirac, The Quantum Theory of the Absorption and Emission of Radiation, Proc. Royal Soc. London A114 (1927) 243.
W. Heisenberg, Uber die in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen auftretende universelle Länge, Ann. der Physik (5) 32 (1938) 20.
W. Heisenberg, Z. für Phys. 101 (1936) 533.
W. Heisenberg, Die “beobachtbaren Grössen” in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen I, Z. für Phys. 120 (1943) 513.
W. Heisenberg, Die “beobachtbaren Grössen” in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen I, Z. für Phys. II 120 (1943) 673.
L. Van Hove, Sur l’operateur Hamiltonian de deux champs quantifiés en intéraction, Bulletin de l’Académie royale de Belgique 37 (1951) 1055.
B. Simon, Perturbation Theory and Coupling Constant Analyticity in Two-Dimensional Field Theories in “Fundamental Interactions in Physics and Astrophysics”, p. 120, Eds. G. Iverson, A. Perlmutter and S. Mintz, Plenum Press (1973).
F.J. Dyson, Divergence of Perturbation in Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 631.
For a general review, see the proceedings of the 1973 Erice Mathematical Physics School, Constructive Quantum Field Theory, Eds. G. Velo and A. Wightman, Lecture Notes in Physics No. 25, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1973).
J. Eckmann, J. Magnen and R. Sénéor, Decay Properties and Borel Summability for the Schwinger Functions in P(Φ)2 Theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 39 (1975) 251.
J, Eckmann, H. Epstein and J. Fröhlich, Asymptotic Perturbation Expansion for the S-Matrix and the Definition of Time-Ordered Functions in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Models, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré XXV (1976) 1.
N.N. Khuri, Solutions of the Callan-Symanzik Equation in a Complex Neighbourhood of Zero Coupling, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 2298.
J. Glimm, A. Jaffe and T. Spencer, A Convergent Expansion about Mean Field Theory, I II Ann. of Physics 101. (1976) 610 and 631.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wightman, A.S. (1979). Should We Believe in Quantum Field Theory?. In: Zichichi, A. (eds) The Whys of Subnuclear Physics. The Subnuclear Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0991-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0991-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0993-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0991-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive