Skip to main content

Safety of Ultrasound in Diagnosis

  • Chapter
  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

This paper extends and updates previous reviews of this subject, including two by the present author. Any hazard that may arise from diagnostic ultrasound is presumably related to physical levels of exposure. Information on this point is sparse but some order-of-magnitude figures are given. Evidence for hazard at a given exposure level comes from three complimentary types of investigation: biophysical studies, screening investigations and epidemiology. In each case some of the data that is available is open to criticism and certain gaps and inconsistencies remain. Nevertheless the concensus of evidence from systematic studies provides strong indication that current practice is without hazard. Reports to the contrary must always be taken seriously but none so far has been substantiated by independent work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hill, C.R.: The possibility of hazard in Medical and industrial applications of ultrasound. Brit.J. Radiol. 41 (1968) 561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill, C.R.: Biological effects of ultrasound, Ultrasonics in Clinical Diagnosis (Wells, P.N.T. Ed.) Ch.9. Churchill Livingston, London (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, C.R.: Acoustic intensity measurements on ultrasonic diagnostic devices. Part 2, Ultrasonoqraphia Medica (Bock, J. Ed.). Vienna Academy of Medicine. Vienna (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart, H.F. et al: Survey of use and performance of ultrasonic therapy equipment in Pinellas County, Florida. US Govt. Publication DHEW(FDA)73-8039 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, C.R.: Action of ultrasound on isolated cells and cell cultures (proceedings of this meeting, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lyon, M.F. and Simpson, G.M.: An investigation into the possible genetic hazards of ultrasound. Brit. J. Radiol. (in the press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warwick, R., Pond, J.B., Woodward, B. and Connolly, C.C.: Hazards of diagnostic ultrasonography — a study with mice. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason SU-17 (1970) 158.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shimizu, T. and Shoji, R. An experimental safety study of mice exposed to low intensity ultrasound. Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series No. 277 (1973) p.28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hellman, L.M., Duffus, G.M., Donald, I. and Sunden, B. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics. Lancet 1 (1970) 1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, C.R. (1975). Safety of Ultrasound in Diagnosis. In: Michaelson, S.M., Miller, M.W., Magin, R., Carstensen, E.L. (eds) Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0760-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0760-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0762-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0760-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics