Skip to main content

Writing an Effective Abstract

  • Chapter
Principles and Practice of Research
  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

An abstract should be a concise distillate or synopsis of the work being reported and must emphasize what was done, how it was done, the results obtained, and how the author interprets them. In most instances, the organization or publication to which the abstract is submitted defines its length (usually one standard size double-spaced typewritten page, i.e., approximately 200 to 250 words), and that limit is inviolable. This required brevity precludes all extraneous material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Warren R. The abstract. Arch Surg 1976; 111: 63536.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baue AE. Writing a good abstract is not abstract writing. Arch Surg 1979; 114: 11–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pruitt BA Jr. Improve your next abstract. Presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Burn Association, Denver, March 20–22, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. How to prepare an abstract. Cordova, TN: AALAS, January 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pruitt, BA Jr. Tips on how to write abstracts for newer members of the American Burn Association. Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the American Burn Association, New Orleans, March 30, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koren G. Letter to the editor—a simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koren G. Letter to the editor—a simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1298.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koren G. Letter to the editor—a simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1298.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koren G. Letter to the editor—a simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1298.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koren G. Letter to the editor—a simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pruitt, B.A., Mason, A.D. (1991). Writing an Effective Abstract. In: Troidl, H., et al. Principles and Practice of Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0371-8_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0371-8_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0373-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0371-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics