Skip to main content

Roles for the Surgical Investigator

  • Chapter
Principles and Practice of Research
  • 239 Accesses

Abstract

A surgical investigator is a bridge tender, channelling knowledge from biological science to the patient’s bedside and back again. He traces his origin from both ends of the bridge. He is thus a bastard and is called this by everybody. Those at one end of the bridge say he is not a very good scientist, and those at the other say that he does not spend enough time in the operating room. If only he is willing to live with this abuse, he can continue to do his job effectively.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moore FD. The university in American surgery. Surgery 1958; 44: 1–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanlon CR. Decline of surgical research. Bull Am Coll Surg 1985; 70: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballinger WF, II. Surgical research as a discipline. In: Research Methods in Surgery, Ballinger WF II, editor, Boston: Little, Brown, 1964: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bronk D (quoted from Genest J). Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Canada 1985; 18: 323–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Culliton BJ. Emery reports on Darsee’s fraud. Science 1983; 220: 936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Genest J. Clouds threatening medical research. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Canada 1985; 18: 323–28.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailar JC, III, Patterson K. Journal peer review: the need for a research agenda. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 654.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moore GE. Surgeons: age, training and creativity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1960; 110: 105–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbon JH, Jr. The road ahead for thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961; 42: 141–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis C. A heart-lung machine for open-heart operations. How it came about. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1989; 35: 767–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernard C. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, Green HC, transi. New York: Dover, 1957: 33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiu, R.CJ., Mulder, D.S. (1991). Roles for the Surgical Investigator. In: Troidl, H., et al. Principles and Practice of Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0371-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0371-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0373-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0371-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics