Advertisement

Forest Stress: Symptomatic Foliar Damage Caused by Air Contaminants

  • William H. Smith
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

Under conditions of sufficient dose, air pollutants directly cause visible injury to forest trees. The accumulation of particulate contaminants on leaf surfaces or the continued uptake of gaseous pollutants through leaf stomata will eventually result in cell and tissue damage that will be manifest in foliar symptoms obvious to the trained, but unaided eye. This direct induction of disease in trees by air pollutants is the most dramatic and obvious individual tree response of all Class II interactions. It is the only Class II interaction that can be detected in the field by causal observation. Unlike altered reproductive strategy, nutrient cycling, tree metabolism, or insect and disease relationships; the degree of foliar symptoms induced by air pollutants can be relatively easily observed, inventoried, and quantified. In the presence of sufficient dose, tree damage may be of sufficient severity to cause mortality. Tree death directly induced by ambient air pollution exposure is considered a Class III interaction and is treated in Chapter 16.

Keywords

Zinc Sugar Nickel Starch Dioxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonovics, J., A. D. Bradshaw, and R. G. Turner. 1971. Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Adv. Ecol. 7:1–85.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, C. R. 1974. Age of pine seedlings with primary needles affects sensitivity to ozone and sulfur dioxide. Phytopathology 64:207–209.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, C. R., and G. H. Hepting. 1964. Injury to eastern white pine by unidentified atmospheric constituents. For. Sci. 10:2–13.Google Scholar
  4. Bjorkman, E. 1970. The effect of fertilization on sulfur dioxide damage to conifers in industrial and built-up areas. Stud. For. Suec. 78:1–48.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, H. J. M. 1966. Trace Elements in Biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, 241 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, E., and I. A. Leone. 1968. The response of plants to sulfur dioxide or ozone-polluted air supplied at varying flow rates. Phytopathology 58:1661–1664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation. 1969. Air Pollution Proc. 1st European Congr. on the Influence of Air Pollution on Plants and Animals. Wageningen, The Netherlands, April 22–27, 1968, 415 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, C. W. 1975. Fluorides. In: J. B. Mudd and T. T. Kozlowski (Eds.), Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 57–95.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities. 1978. Criteria Dose-Effect Relationships for Cadmium. Pergamon Press, New York, 202 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Connor, J. J., H. T. Shacklette, R. J. Ebens, J. A. Erdman, A. T. Miesch, R. R. Tidball, and H. A. Bourtelot. 1975. Background Geochemistry of Some Rocks, Soils, Plants and Vegetables in the Conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper No. 574-F, Washington, D.C., 168 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Costonis, A. C. 1976. Criteria for evaluating air pollution injury to forest trees. IUFRO Congress, Oslo, Norway, June 21–26, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Cotrufo, C. 1974. The sensitivity of a white pine clone to air pollution as affected by N, P, and K. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Research Note No. SE-198, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Cotrufo, C., and C. R. Berry. 1970. Some effects of a soluble NPK fertilizer on sensitivity of eastern white pine to injury from SO2 air pollution. For. Sci. 16:72–73.Google Scholar
  14. Darley, E. F., and J. T. Middleton. 1966. Problems of air pollution in plant pathology. Annu. Rev. Phytopath. 4:103–118.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, D. D. 1975a. Variable tree response due to environmental factors-climate. In: W. H. Smith and L. S. Dochinger (Eds.), Air Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. PIEFR-PA-1, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, D. D. 1975b. Resistance of young ponderosa pine seedlings to acute doses of PAN. Plant Dis. Reptr. 59:183–184.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, D. D. 1977. Response of ponderosa pine primary needles to separate and simultaneous ozone and PAN exposures. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61:640–644.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, D. D., and J. B. Coppolino. 1974. Relationship between age and ozone sensitivity of current needles of ponderosa pine. Plant Dis. Reptr. 58:660–663.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, D. D., and R. G. Wilhour. 1976. Susceptibility of Woody Plants to Sulfur Dioxide and Photochemical Oxidants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Publica. No. EPA-600/3-76-102, Corvallis, Oregon, 71 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, D. D., and F. A. Wood. 1973a. The influence of environmental factors on the sensitivity of Virginia pine to ozone. Phytopathology 63:371–376.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, D. D., and F. A. Wood. 1973b. The influence of plant age on the sensitivity of Virginia pine to ozone. Phytopathology 63:381–388.Google Scholar
  22. Dochinger, L. S. 1964. Effects of nutrition on the chlorotic dwarf disease of eastern white pine. Plant Dis. Reptr. 48:107–109.Google Scholar
  23. Dochinger, L. S., and D. E. Seliskar. 1970. Air pollution and the chlorotic dwarf disease of eastern white pine. For. Sci. 16:46–55.Google Scholar
  24. Dochinger, L. S., F. W. Bender, F. L. Fox, and W. E. Heck. 1970. Chlorotic dwarf of eastern white pine caused by an ozone and sulphur dioxide interaction. Nature 225:476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Drummond, D. B. 1971. Influence of high concentrations of peroxyacetylnitrate on woody plants. Phytopathology 61:178.Google Scholar
  26. Dunning, J. A., and W. W. Heck. 1973. Response of pinto bean and tobacco to ozone as conditioned by light intensity and/or humidity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7:824–826.Google Scholar
  27. Energy Research and Development Administration. 1975. Biological Implications of Metals in the Environment. ERDA Symposium Series No. 42, Washington, D.C., 682 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Forestry Commission (England). 1971. Fume Damage to Forests. Research and Development Paper No. 82, London, 50 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Friberg, L., M. Piscator, G. Nordberg, and T. Kjellstrom. 1974. Cadmium in the Environment. Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Friberg, L., and J. Vostal. 1972. Mercury in the Environment. Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 215 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Fuhrer, J., and K. H. Erismann. 1980. Uptake of NO2 by plants grown at different salinity levels. Experientia 36:409–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Genys, J. B., and H. E. Heggestad. 1978. Susceptibility of different species, clones and strains of pines to acute injury caused by ozone and sulfur dioxide. Plant Dis. Reptr. 62:687–691.Google Scholar
  33. Gerhold, H. D. 1975. Resistant varieties. In: W. H. Smith and L. S. Dochinger (Eds.), Air Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. PIERR-PA-1, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
  34. Gerhold, H. D. 1977. Effect of Air Pollution on Pinus strobus L. and Genetic Resistance. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Publica. No. EPA-600/3-77-002. Corvallis, Oregon, 45 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Guderian, R. 1977. Air Pollution Phytoxicity of Acidic Gases and Its Significance in Air Pollution Control. Ecological Studies No. 22. Springer-Verlag, New York, 122 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Heagle, A. S. 1979. Effects of growth media, fertilizer rate and hour and season of exposure on sensitivity of four soybean cultivars to ozone. Environ. Pollut. 18:313–322.Google Scholar
  37. Heagle, A. S., W. W. Heck, and D. Body. 1971. Ozone injury to plants as influenced by air velocity during exposure. Phytopathology 61:1209–1212.Google Scholar
  38. Heagle, A. S., R. B. Philbeck, H. H. Rogers, and M. B. Letchworth. 1979. Dispensing and monitoring ozone in opentop field chambers for plant-effects studies. Phytopathology 69:15–20.Google Scholar
  39. Heath, R. L. 1975. Ozone. In: J. B. Mudd and T. T. Kozlowski (Eds.), Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
  40. Heck, W. W. 1968. Factors influencing expression of oxidant damage to plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 6:165–188.Google Scholar
  41. Heggestad, H. E. 1968. Diseases of crops and ornamental plants incited by air pollutants. Phytopathology 58:1089–1097.Google Scholar
  42. Heggestad, H. E., and W. W. Heck. 1971. Nature, extent, and variation of plant response to air pollutants. Adv. Agronomy 23:111–145.Google Scholar
  43. Heitschmidt, R. K., and J. Altman. 1978. Probable Effects of SO2 on Agricultural Crops. Experiment Station, Colorado State University, Tech. Bull. No. 133, Fort Collins, Colorado, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Hindawi, I. J. 1970. Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation. U.S. Dept. Health, Education and Welfare, National Air Pollution Control Administration, Raleigh, North Carolina, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Jacobson, J. S., and A. C. Hill. 1970. Recognition of Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation: A Pictorial Atlas. Air Pollution Control Association, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  46. Jäger, H. J., and H. Klein. 1976. Studies on the influence of nutrition on the susceptibility of plants to SO2. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 6:347–353.Google Scholar
  47. Karnosky, D. F. 1974. Implications of genetic variation in host resistance to air pollutants. Proc. 9th Central States Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Ames, Iowa, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
  48. Karnosky, D. F. 1977. Evidence for genetic control of response to sulfur dioxide and ozone in Populus tremuloides. Can. J. For. Res. 7:437–440.Google Scholar
  49. Karnosky, D. F. 1978a. Selection and testing programs for developing air pollution tolerant trees for urban areas. Proc. IUFRO Air Pollution Meeting, Sept. 18–23, 1978, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
  50. Karnosky, D. F. 1978b. Genetics of air pollution tolerance of trees in the Northeastern United States. Proc. 26th Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conf., July 25–27, 1978, Pennsylvania State Univ. State College. Pennsylvania, pp. 161–178.Google Scholar
  51. Kathny, E. L., Ed. 1973. Trace Elements in the Environment. American Chemical Soc., Adv. in Chem. Series No. 123, Washington, D.C., 149 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Keller, T. 1975a. On the phytotoxicity of fluoride immissions for woody plants. Mitt. eidg. Anst. forstl. Vers’wes 51:303–331.Google Scholar
  53. Keller, T. 1975b. On the translocation of fluoride in forest trees. Mitt. eidg. Anst. forstl. Vers’wes 51:335–356.Google Scholar
  54. Krause, G. H., and H. Kaiser. 1977. Plant response to heavy metals and sulphur dioxide. Environ. Pollut. 12:63–71.Google Scholar
  55. Lacasse, N. L., and W. J. Moroz. 1969. Handbook of Effects Assessment—Vegetation Damage. Center for Air Environment Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  56. Leone, I. A. 1976. Response of potassium deficient tomato plants to atmospheric ozone. Phytopathology 66:734–736.Google Scholar
  57. Leone, I. A., and E. Brennan. 1969. The importance of moisture in ozone phytotoxicity. Atmos. Environ. 3:399–406.Google Scholar
  58. Linzon, S. N. 1978. Effects of airborne sulfur pollutants on plants. In: J. O. Nriagu (Ed.), Sulfur in the Environment: Part II, Ecological Impacts. Wiley, New York, pp. 109–162.Google Scholar
  59. Loomis, R. C., and W. H. Padgett. 1973. Air Pollution and Trees in the East. U.S. D.A. Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Atlanta, Georgia, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  60. Matsushima, J., and R. F. Brewer. 1972. Influence of sulfur dioxide and hydrogen fluoride as a mix or reciprocal exposure on citrus growth and development. J. Air Pollut. Assoc. 22:710–713.Google Scholar
  61. McCune, D.C., and L.H. Weinstein. 1971. Metabolic effects of atmospheric fluorides on plants. Environ. Pollut. 1:169–174.Google Scholar
  62. Mitchell, C. D., and T. A. Fretz. 1977. Cadmium and zinc toxicity in white pine, red maple, and Norway spruce. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:81–84.Google Scholar
  63. Mudd, J. B. 1973. Biochemical effects of some air pollutants on plants. In: J. A. Naegele (Ed.), Air Pollution Damage to Vegetation. Adv. Chem. Series No. 122, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
  64. Mudd, J. B. 1975a. Sulfur dioxide. In: J. B. Mudd and T. T. Kozlowski (Eds.), Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
  65. Mudd, J. B. 1975b. Peroxyacetyl nitrates. In: J. B. Mudd and T. T. Kozlowski (Eds.), Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
  66. Mudd, J. B., and T. T. Kozlowski. 1975. Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, 383 pp.Google Scholar
  67. Naegele, J. A. 1973. Air Pollution Damage to Vegetation. Advances in Chemistry Series No. 122, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., 137 pp.Google Scholar
  68. National Academy of Sciences. 1974. Chromium. NAS, Washington, D.C., 155 PP.Google Scholar
  69. National Academy of Sciences. 1975. Nickel. NAS, Washington, D.C., 277 pp.Google Scholar
  70. National Academy of Sciences. 1977a. Copper, NAS, Washington, D.C., 115 pp.Google Scholar
  71. National Academy of Sciences. 1977b. Effects of nitrogen oxides on vegetation. In: Nitrogen Oxides. NAS, Washington, D.C., pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
  72. National Academy of Sciences. 1977c. Ozone and Other Photochemical Oxidants. NAS, Washington, D.C., 789 pp.Google Scholar
  73. National Academy of Sciences. 1978a. Effects of atmospheric sulfur oxides and related compounds on vegetation. In: Sulfur Oxides. NAS, Washington, D.C., pp. 80–129.Google Scholar
  74. National Academy of Sciences. 1978b. An Assessment of Mercury in the Environment. NAS, Washington, D.C., 192 pp.Google Scholar
  75. Nielsen, D. G., L. E. Terrell, and T. C. Weidensaul. 1977. Phytotoxicity of ozone and sulfur dioxide to laboratory fumigated Scotch pine. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61: 699–703.Google Scholar
  76. Nriagu, J. O., Ed. 1980. Zinc in the Environment. Part I. Ecological Cycling. Wiley-Interscience, Somerset, New Jersey, 464 pp.Google Scholar
  77. Nriagu, J. O., Ed. 1980. Zinc in the Environment. Part. Ecological Cycling. Wiley-Interscience, Somerset, New Jersey, 464 pp.Google Scholar
  78. O’Connor, J. A., D. G. Parbery, and W. Strauss. 1974. The effects of phytotoxic gases on native Austrialian plant species. Part I. Acute effects of sulphur dioxide. Environ. Pollut. 7:7–23.Google Scholar
  79. Oehme, F. W., Ed. 1978. Toxicity of Heavy Metals in the Environment. Dekker, New York, Part I, 515 pp. ; Part II, 970 pp.Google Scholar
  80. Otto, H. W., and R. H. Daines. 1969. Plant injury by air pollutants. Influence of humidity on stomatal apertures and plant response to ozone. Science 163: 1209–1210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Peterson, P. J. 1978. Lead and vegetation. In: J. O. Nriagu (Ed.), The Biochemistry of Lead in the Environment. Part B. Biological Effects. Elsevier/North- Holland Biomedical Press, New York, pp. 355–384.Google Scholar
  82. Purves, D. 1977. Trace Element Contamination of the Environment. Elsevier, New York, 260 pp.Google Scholar
  83. Reinert, R. A. 1975. Pollutant interactions and their effects on plants. Environ. Pollut. 9:115–116.Google Scholar
  84. Shacklette, H. T., J. A. Erdman, T. F. Harms, and C. S. E. Pupp. 1978. Trace elements in plant foodstuffs. In: F. W. Oehme (Ed.), Toxicity of Heavy Metals in the Environment. Dekker, New York, pp. 25–68.Google Scholar
  85. Smith, H. J., and D. D. Davis. 1977. The influence of needle age on sensitivity of Scotch pine to acute doses of SO2. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61:870–874.Google Scholar
  86. Smith, W. H. 1975. Variable tree response due to environmental factors-edaphic. In: W. H. Smith and L. S. Dochinger (Eds.), Air Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation, U.S.D.A. Forest Service. PIEFR-PA-1, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  87. Steiner, K. C., and D. D. Davis. 1979. Variation among Fraxinus families in foliar response to ozone. Can. J. For. Res. 9:106–109.Google Scholar
  88. Stern, A.C., H.C. Wohlers, R.W. Boubel, and W. P. Lowry. 1973. Fundamentals of Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, 492 pp.Google Scholar
  89. Tamm, C. O., and A. Aronson. 1972. Plant Growth as affected by Sulphur Compounds in Polluted Atmosphere. A Literature Survey. Royal College of Forestry, Dept. Forest Ecology and Forest Soils, Research Note No. 12, Stockholm, Sweden, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  90. Taylor, O. C. 1973. Oxidant Air Pollutant Effects on a Western Coniferous Forest Ecosystem. Task C Report No. EP-R3-73-043B. Statewide Air Pollut. Res. Center, Riverside, California, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  91. Taylor, O. C., C. R. Thompson, D. T. Tingey, and R. A. Reinert. 1975. Oxides of nitrogen. In: J. B. Mudd and T. T. Kozlowski (Eds.), Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
  92. Temple, P. J., and R. Wills. 1979. Sampling and analysis of plants and soils. In: W. W. Heck, S. V. Krupa, and S. N. Linzon (Eds.), Methodology for the Assessment of Air Pollution Effects on Vegetation. Air Pollution Control Assoc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chap. 13, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  93. Thompson, C. R., and G. Kats. 1978. Effects of continuous H2S fumigation on crop and forest plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12:550–553.Google Scholar
  94. Tingey, D. T., and R. A. Reinert. 1975. The effect of ozone and sulphur dioxide singly and in combination on plant growth. Environ. Pollut. 9:117–125.Google Scholar
  95. Townsend, A. M. 1975. Variable tree response due to genetic factors. In: W. H. Smith and L. S. Dochinger (Eds.), Air Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. PIEFR-PA-1, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  96. Treshow, M. 1970. Ozone damage to plants. Environ. Pollut. 1:155–161.Google Scholar
  97. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 1973. Air Pollution Damages Trees. State and Private Forestry, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  98. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1976. Diagnosing Vegetation Injury Caused by Air Pollution. U.S.E.P.A., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  99. Wallace, R. G., and D. J. Spedding. 1976. The biochemical basis of plant damage by atmospheric sulphur dioxide. Clean Air 10:61–64.Google Scholar
  100. Weinstein, L. 1975. Dose-response relationships. In: W. H. Smith and L. S. Dochinger (Eds.), Air Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation. U.S. D.A. Forest Service. PIEFR-PA-1, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
  101. Weinstein, L. H. 1977. Fluoride and plant life. J. Occupa. Med. 19:49–78.Google Scholar
  102. Weinstein, L. H., and D. C. McCune. 1971. Effects of fluoride on agriculture. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 21:410–413.Google Scholar
  103. Weinstein, L. H., and D. C. McCune. 1979. Air pollution stress. In: H. Mussell and R. Staples (Eds.), Stress Physiology in Crop Plants. Wiley, New York, pp. 328–341.Google Scholar
  104. Wilhour, R. G. 1970. The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the response of white ash to ozone. Phytopathology 70:579.Google Scholar
  105. Zeevaart, A. J. 1976. Some effects of fumigating plants for short periods with NO2.Environ. Pollut. 11:97–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Greeley Memorial LaboratorySchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations