Skip to main content

Molecular Variation and the Delimitation of Species

  • Chapter
  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

Species are widely regarded as fundamental elements of modern biology, but practitioners of species biology—those who delimit and study the attributes of species, and seek to understand the manner in which species originate—have yet to agree on what a species is. To state the case more accurately, there is less agreement now than there has been at times in the past. The controversy over species concepts takes many forms, from quiet certitude among members of some communities that theirs is the proper view, to open, vigorous, and sometimes rancorous debate. One modern viewpoint, often unstated however, is that the very word species is an outmoded vestige of another era, perhaps more fashionable than phlogiston, but only a word to be used loosely and vaguely, as a placeholder, with little risk of argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baum DA (1992): Phylogenetic species concepts. Tr Ecol Evol 7:1–2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum DA, Donoghue MJ (1993): Choosing among alternative phylogenetic species concepts. Am J Bot 80:115 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum DA, Shaw KL (1995): Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In: Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics, Hoch PC, Stevenson AG, Schaal BA, eds. St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady RH (1985): On the independence of systematics. Cladistics 1:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J (1983): Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ornithol 1:159–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J (1989): Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. In: Speciation and Its Consequences, Otte D, Endler JA, eds. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JI, Goldman DH (1993): Isozyme variation and species delimitation among diploid populations of the Puccinellia nuttalliana complex (Poaceae): character fixation and the discovery of phylogenetic species. Taxon 42:585–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JI, Manos PS (1991): Isozyme variation and species delimitation in the Puccinellia nuttalliana complex (Poaceae): an application of the phylogenetic species concept. Syst Bot 16:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992): Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst Biol 41:421–435

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz K, Donoghue MJ (1988): Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1937): Genetics and the Origin of Species .New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue MJ (1985): A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ (1992): Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst Bot 17:144–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS (1974): Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst Zool 23:548–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1991): Molecular changes at speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:281–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966): Phylogenetic Systematics .Urbana, IL: University Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson RR (1990): Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Sur Evol Biol 7:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1992): Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583–589

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1942): Systematics and the Origin of Species .New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982): The Growth of Biological Thought .Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987): Molecular Evolutionary Genetics .New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Neigel JE, Avise JC (1986): Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary Processes and Theory, Karlin S, Nevo E, eds. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson G, Platnick N (1981): Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vic-ariance .New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon KC, Wheeler QD (1990): An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Nei M (1988): Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol Biol Evol 5:568–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson HEH (1985): The recognition concept of species. In: Species and Speciation, Vrba ES, ed. Pretoria, South Africa: Transvaal Museum Monograph 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick NI (1977): Cladograms, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing. Syst Zool 26:438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen DE (1979): Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative geography. Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist 162:267–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1989): A cladistic measure of gene flow inferred from the phylogenies of alleles. Genetics 123:603–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tateno Y, Nei M, Tajima F (1982): Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. J Mol Evol 18:387–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR (1989): The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Speciation and Its Consequences, Otte D, Endler, JA, eds. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, J.I. (1996). Molecular Variation and the Delimitation of Species. In: Sobral, B.W.S. (eds) The Impact of Plant Molecular Genetics. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9855-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9855-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9857-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9855-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics