Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Illusions of Science

  • Chapter
Neurolinguistics Historical and Theoretical Perspectives

Part of the book series: Applied Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders ((APCD))

  • 187 Accesses

Abstract

In 1784, Procháska,1 taking up the ideas of Willis,' divided the nervous system into sensorium commune (brain stern, spinal cord and nerves), and the rest of the brain as seat of the intellect. Since the brain was composed of such differently fashioned parts, he reasoned, it seemed that nature, which never acts in vain, chose, in differentiating these parts, to give them different functions as well.

Even if Gall had claimed to owe nothing to any of his predecessors, even if he had thought that he was starting from scratch, we would still have to place his work in the context of works near to his own time and a few decades previous to that, in order to be able to read him with any understanding.

Lanteri-Laura ([220b], p. 13)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jiri Procháska (1749-1820).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Willis: see [423a].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soemmering: see note 56, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giovanni Battista Porta (1550-162?). After establishing the influence of affections of mind on the body, he indicates the signs by which the personalities of individuals can be recognized. Porta was inspired by Aristotle, Polemon and Adamantius.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cornelio Ghirardelli, born towards the end of the 16th century.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broussais recounts the example of the Marchese of Mascardi, Minister for Justice in the Kingdom of Naples, who applied Porta’s ideas to decide on the criminality of accused persons, based on an examination of their physiognomy ([220b], p. 24).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johann Kaspar Lavater (1741-1801).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gall: see note 60, p. 110. In spite of his unscientific flights of imagina-tion, he was a great anatomist: “Gall’s research on the formation and structure of the brain has been the starting-point for persevering work which in many ways has brought results of great importance and which has in particular enabled us to know better the conditions of form and structure with regard to the cerebral convolutions.” ([300b], p. 685).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pierre Marie (1853-1940).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pierre Paul Broca (1824-1888), founder of the Société, Journal and Ecole d’Anthropologie.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See [220b], p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The essential object is the study of the brain; the skull is only a secondary object ([220b], p. 104).

    Google Scholar 

  13. According to Gall and Spurzheim ([143], vol. IV, pp. 68ff.). Note that the essentials of Gall’s doctrine are to be found in [142d], which Gall published alone after his break with Spurzheim.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rolando: see p. 109, note 53 ([347b])

    Google Scholar 

  15. F.A Longet (1811-1871).

    Google Scholar 

  16. AL. Foville (1789-1878).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brillat-Savarin (1755-1826). La Physiologie du Goût dates from 1825. Balzac (1799-1850) wrote La Physiologie du Manage in 1829.

    Google Scholar 

  18. We find in ([142d], vol. III, pp. 145f.): “I owe almost all my anatomical discoveries to my physiological and pathological ideas; and it was only following on these latter that I was able to convince myself of the perfect concordance of moral and intellectual phenomena with the material conditions of their manifestation.”

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spurzheim, G.: see p. 110, note 61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. i.e. [143].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pierre François Gonthier Maine de Biran (1766-1824).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See [220b].

    Google Scholar 

  24. See note 22. The paper entitled “Observations on the organic divisions of the brain” originated as the inaugural lecture of the medical society. It was first known under the title “Observations on Dr Gall’s system”.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jean Cruveilher (1791-1874).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Georges Cuvier (1769-1832).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pierre Flourens: p. 108, note 26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Louis Pierre Gratiolet (1815-1865).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See [117].

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marie François Xavier Bichat (1771-1802).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jean-Baptiste Bouillaud (1796-1881).

    Google Scholar 

  32. See [127a,b].

    Google Scholar 

  33. See [347a].

    Google Scholar 

  34. Augustin Serres (1786-1868).

    Google Scholar 

  35. See [127a,b,c].

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nicolas Saucerotte (1741-1814).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Philippe Pinel (1745-1826).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pierre Marie: see note 9 above.

    Google Scholar 

  39. He had some difficulty accepting the dissociation of the brain into specialized zones, and admitted being completely hostile to phrenology ([285], p. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gabriel Andral (1797-1876). In his Clinique of 1834, he had pointed to the coincidence of unintelligibility of speech and babbling with right hemiplegia by lesion localized in the left corpus striatum. See Moutier ([285], p. 15).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine, IV, pp. 282-328.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ibid., 1848, 1ertrimestre, pp. 699-719.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Simon-Alexandre Ernest Auburtin (1825-1893).

    Google Scholar 

  44. See note 10 above.

    Google Scholar 

  45. F. Lallemand (1790-1854).

    Google Scholar 

  46. See [163b].

    Google Scholar 

  47. See note 40.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Louis Léon Rostan (1790-1866).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jean Pierre Frank (1745-1821).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jacques Lordat (1773-1870) of the Montepellier Medical School. On July 17,1825 a chronic sore throat triggered the attack which for weeks deprived him of speech and reading.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See [395].

    Google Scholar 

  52. We must mention here, as a source of documentation, the article by Riese [343a].

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moutier ([285], p. 16) mentions Lordat’s book L’Analyse de la Parole (1823). In fact Lordat published, or rather authorized his student Kühnholtz to publish his lectures from the course in physiology from the academic year 1842-43, under the title “Analysis of speech, to serve the theory of various cases of alalia and paralalia (mutism and imperfections of speaking) which nosologists have failed to recognize”, in the Journal de la Société de Médecine Pratique de Montpellier VII, pp. 333-353 and 417-433; VIII, pp. 1-17 (1843). This is also the view of Quercy and Bayle (see [24]).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Benton [29b], like Riese (note 52), emphasizes Lordat’s influence on Dax Sr. and Jr. The father, Marc Dax, a doctor in Sommières, has presented a communication to the Medical Conference in Montpellier in July 1836; in this communication he established a relationship between forgetting the signs of thought and lesions of the left hemisphere. Marc Dax even noted that this observation had been made by Schen-kius.

    Google Scholar 

  55. The patients Broca concerned himself with were practically hopeless cases where speech had almost completely disappeared.

    Google Scholar 

  56. “When I wished to glance at the book I was reading when my illness had struck, I found myself unable to read the title” [243].

    Google Scholar 

  57. See note 53.

    Google Scholar 

  58. “The difficulty increased rapidly, and, in the space of 24 hours, I found myself deprived of the value of almost all words. Though there were a few left to me, they were becoming almost useless, because I could no longer remember the way to coordinate them in my mind so that they could express a thought…” [243].

    Google Scholar 

  59. “…For all that, it was necessary to‘corporify’ all the ideas in my mind; as a result, to exercise memory, to recall to mind the ideas of sounds; that could only be done with efforts that tired me for a long time, and which have never ceased to be a burden to me” [243]

    Google Scholar 

  60. See ([24], p. 300, n. 1): “Language is a pananthropic function.”

    Google Scholar 

  61. As we know, this preoccupation with thought and language has turned out to be a focus for 20th-century linguistic debate.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See p. 109, note 55.

    Google Scholar 

  63. See [220b], pp. 114f.

    Google Scholar 

  64. See p. 108, note 26. Flourens ([127e], p. 251) himself refers to [127d].

    Google Scholar 

  65. See p. 110, note 62. The work cited here was published in Heidelberg in 1821.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See p. 110, note 63.

    Google Scholar 

  67. See note 28 above.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Claude Bernard (1813-1878).

    Google Scholar 

  69. See p. 107, note 3.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg (1795-1876).

    Google Scholar 

  71. The achromatic microscope was gradually developed from lenses used for telescopes. Its aim was to eliminate chromatic aberrations from the image by using prisms.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gabriel Gustav Valentin (1810-1883).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jules Gabriel François Baillarger (1806-1891).

    Google Scholar 

  74. See p. 58, note 16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. See note 55, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Indeed Malpighi had suggested that the “conduits” of white matter were connected with the “glands of the cortex”.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Robert Remak (1815-1865) identified myelinated fibre, which Leeuwen-hoek and Fontana may have seen.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rudolf A. von Koelliker (1817-1905).

    Google Scholar 

  79. See p. 107, note 8.

    Google Scholar 

  80. See [276] and [277a,b].

    Google Scholar 

  81. See note 77.

    Google Scholar 

  82. It is perhaps of interest to point out that there may be correlations between the myelination process and speech and language development. See [225].

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rudolf Berlin (1833-1897).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Theodor Meynert (1833-1892).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Vladimir Alexewitsch Betz (1834-1894).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Eduard Hitzig (1838-1907) and Gustav Theodor Fritsch (1838-1927): the names of these two physiologists are linked as a result of their experiment in electrical stimulation of the canine brain.

    Google Scholar 

  87. See [337].

    Google Scholar 

  88. Jan Evangelista Purkyne (1787-1869).

    Google Scholar 

  89. See note 70.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Theodor Schwann (1810-1882).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Adolf Hannover (1814-1894).

    Google Scholar 

  92. See note 78.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Koelliker presents his point of view in [210c], but he had already done so in his communication [210a].

    Google Scholar 

  94. Otto Friedrich Karl Deiters (1834-1863).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Anastomosis is the contact of two blood vessels, arterial or lymphatic, and by extension between two conduits of similar nature, such as two nerves.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Rudolf Johann Wagner (1805-1864).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Joseph von Gerlach (1820-1896).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Camillo Golgi (1843-1926).

    Google Scholar 

  99. See pp. 182ff.

    Google Scholar 

  100. See [256].

    Google Scholar 

  101. See p. 109 note 40.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Johannes Müller (1801-1858).

    Google Scholar 

  103. See p. 112, note 95.

    Google Scholar 

  104. See p. 113, note 98.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Du Bois-Reymond: see [108b].

    Google Scholar 

  106. Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz (1821-1894).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Ludimar Hermann (1838-1914)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Charles P. Bouton

Authors
  1. Charles P. Bouton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouton, C.P. (1991). Illusions of Science. In: Neurolinguistics Historical and Theoretical Perspectives. Applied Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9570-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9570-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9572-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9570-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation