Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders ((APCD))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

The prejudice would remain a long time. Impaired speech was regarded as the punishment of a hidden misdeed that the punishment itself exposes. It is an object of scandal, for the misdeed is disruption of an order which only supernatural intervention can restore.

And there appeared unto him an angel of the Lord... and when Zacharias saw him, he was troubled, and fear fell upon him. But the angel said unto him, Fear not, Zacharias; for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elisabeth shall bear thee a son... And Zacharias said unto the angel, Whereby shall I know this? for I am an old man, and my wife well stricken in years. And the angel answering said unto him, I am Gabriel ... and am sent to speak unto thee and to shew thee these glad tidings. And behold, thou shalt be dumb, and not able to speak, until the day that these things shall be performed, because thou believest not my words...

Luke 1, xi-xx

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charles-Michel de l’Epée (1712-1789).

    Google Scholar 

  2. In the Enclycopédie, we find, in the article “Tongue” (langue): “Such is this marvellous instrument, without which men would be deprived of the pleasure and advantage of society”.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornelius Celsus, a physician of the first century.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Book Epidemics uses the term traulos, but it is impossible to say whether this word refers to a particular defect of speech or if it is a generic term.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hieronymus Mercurialis (1530-1606).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam (1561-1626): see [17]. Quoted by Rieber & Wollock [341].

    Google Scholar 

  7. at the end of the 19th century, Charcot writes, in one of his Leçons du Mardi (1-362; see p. 160, n. 15), that he considers Hartley a remarkable analyst and a forerunner in the study of speech disorders.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 1714-1804 [376].

    Google Scholar 

  9. 1729-1786 [263].

    Google Scholar 

  10. 1731-1802 [93].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Felix II Plat(t)er (1605-1671).

    Google Scholar 

  12. François Boissier de la Croix de Sauvages (1706-1767).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682-1771).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See [29a].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted there is the case reported by Jussien who lived in Portugal in 1717: “A poor girl then 17 years of age, born without a tongue”, and who nonetheless succeeded in being able to speak. Also mentioned is the case: “of a pleasant girl who came into the world with two tongues”.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Interpretation in terms of conflict between the two hemispheres: see [296]; psychological conflict: see [367].

    Google Scholar 

  17. See p. 83, n. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Francisais Mercurius Van Helmont (1618-1699). He published in Germany claiming that he had found the language that every man spoke naturally before the corruption of society. He went so far as to claim that a man born dumb would articulate its characters at sight. Fabre d’Olivet (1786-1825) a century later had the idea of renewing Van Helmont’s bizarre quest. He had previously been interested in deaf-mutism.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Alberti (1560-1600), Oratio de surditate et mutitate, Nuremberg, 1591.

    Google Scholar 

  20. William Holder (1616-1698), an English churchman who acquired considerable fame in 1659 by teaching speech to a young man of distinction, born deaf and dumb, the son of Admiral Alexander Popham. Afterwards deprived of his teacher, the young man seems to have lost the skills he had learned. He was again taken in hand by Dr Wallis, who gave him back the use of speech. This was the subject of a public dispute between the two scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johann Konrad Amman (1669-1730) was interested in the case of a little girl, Esther Kolard, born deaf and dumb, to whom he taught reading, writing and speaking.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holder explains: “Finding then a person in his condition, not capable of hearing; if we would endeavour to make use of the organs of speech (supposed to be of sufficient constitution), there is no way but to have recourse to the other learning sense, which is seeing…” ([189], pp. 115f.).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holder, indeed, notes: “Some of the consonants and most of the vowels, being articulated by so obscure motions and figures that the most learned can hardly agree to describe them, it may well be doubted how they can be described to the eye of deaf persons” ([189], pp. 118f.).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See note 20 of this chapter. John Wallis (1616-1703).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hieronymus Cardanus (1501?-1576?).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pedro de Ponce (15??-1584).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. P. Bonet (late 16th, early 17th century).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Emmanuel Ramirez de Carrion. Born towards the end of the 16th century.

    Google Scholar 

  29. John Bulwer (17th century).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jacob-Rodrigue Pereire (1716-1780). He opened a school for deaf-mutes in Cadiz. Later he appeared in France. D’Azy d’Etavigny asked him to take on the education of his son, a deaf-mute. The pupil was presented to Louis XV, who questioned him by signs and in writing, and rewarded his teacher.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pereire kept his technique a secret. As for Ernault, he made his public, and claimed credit as inventor for a report of the Académie des Sciences. The two rivals were eclipsed when the Abbé de l’Epée devised his “methodical signs”.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roch-Ambroise Cucurron Sicard (1742-1822) deserves credit for continuing and developing the work of the Abbé de PEpée both in its material aspect and in its methods, because he succeeded in raising to the level of abstract mental operations the procedure that the Abbé de l’Epée had used for concrete objects.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 23-79 AD. Book VII, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Armand Trousseau (1801-1867).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Valerius Maximus (c. 30 AD.): [206].

    Google Scholar 

  36. Avicenna: see p. 30, note 31; [166].

    Google Scholar 

  37. The Venerable Bede (673-735).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aulus Gellius lived in the 2nd century; see [15]: Book V, chapter ix.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Opicinus de Canistris (1296-1350).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Antonio Guainerio (died 1440).

    Google Scholar 

  41. See pp. 42ff.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Baverius de Baveriis, or Bavierus, or Baverio: see [23].

    Google Scholar 

  43. It is found in 1725 with Richard Blackmore, who assigns the patient’s inability to pronounce words correctly to the state of the tongue; and in 1743 R. James speaks of a “hesitation of the tongue”.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Paracelsus, Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohen-heim (1493-1541): [298].

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nicolas Massa (died 1563 or 1569).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Francisco Arceo (1493-1573?).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Johann Schenck von Graffenberg (1531-1598). Trousseau cites him in his Clinique médicale.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pierre Chanet (see note 10, p. 82).

    Google Scholar 

  49. William Harvey (1578-1657).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Johann Schmidt (1624-1690): see [364], 4: 195-197.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The patient was able to write a word or sentence that he could not read.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (1588-1679).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Peter Rommel (1643-1708): ([348], 222-227).

    Google Scholar 

  54. See note 13 above.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See E. Ebstein [115].

    Google Scholar 

  56. Antonio Maria Valsalva (1689-1723): [400].

    Google Scholar 

  57. Olof Dalin (1708-1763): ([89], 114-115).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gerard Van Swieten (1700-1772).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Karl von Linné (1707-1778), known as Linnaeus ([239], 6:116-117).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rykof M. Van Goens (1748-1810).

    Google Scholar 

  61. William Falconer (1741-1824).

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. W. Ogle, in [291b] (1: 163-165, 1874).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Johann Gesner (1738-1801).

    Google Scholar 

  64. See [83].

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. Falret [121].

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jean-Paul Grandjean de Fouchy (1707-1788). He was 76 years old [161].

    Google Scholar 

  67. Johann Joachim Spalding (1714-1804).

    Google Scholar 

  68. See note 9 above.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Marcus Herz (1747-1803).

    Google Scholar 

  70. See p. 111, note 78.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Soranus of Ephesus (98-135).

    Google Scholar 

  72. On Methodism, see note 22, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Little is known of Caelius Aurelianus. Conrad Amman made an edition of his works in 1709. Cf. [103].

    Google Scholar 

  74. See [82].

    Google Scholar 

  75. [48], p. 864. Riccobaldo da Ferrara (1243-1312).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Laurent Joubert (1529-1583). The text that concerns us here is [202a]. The Lyons edition of 1608 contains a treatise entitled: Question vulgaire: quel langage parleroit un enfant qui n’auroit jamais ouí parler?

    Google Scholar 

  77. Peter Mexia (end of 15th cent.-1522?).

    Google Scholar 

  78. See [184], p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  79. See p. 110, note 71.

    Google Scholar 

  80. W. C. Gibson [152]. He also notes that W. Heberden, in works published posthumously in 1802, provides some very precise cases of aphasia, while T. de Bordeu (1722-1776) expressed the idea that each part of the body had its representation in the brain.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Robert Boyle (1621-1691): see [52].

    Google Scholar 

  82. See above, note 47.

    Google Scholar 

  83. See p. 82, note 10.

    Google Scholar 

  84. See above, note 45.

    Google Scholar 

  85. See note 28, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  86. See note 49, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  87. See note 12 above.

    Google Scholar 

  88. H. F. Delius (1720-1791).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Joseph-Guichard Du Verney or Duverney (1643-1730).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouton, C.P. (1991). Institutionalizing Deviance. In: Neurolinguistics Historical and Theoretical Perspectives. Applied Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9570-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9570-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9572-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9570-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics