Skip to main content

Alternative Surfaces for Microcarrier Culture of Animal Cells

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eukaryotic Cell Cultures

Abstract

As part of an effort to broaden the applicability and efficiency of microcarrier cell culture various alternative new microcarriers were synthesized. The microcarriers were compared as substrates for the growth of several types of cells and with respect to binding of proteins from the culture medium. Crosslinked dextran has been found to be the most suitable material for a microcarrier matrix and was used as the matrix for the new microcarriers. One type of microcarrier was synthesized so that the charges necessary for cell attachment were present only in the surface layer of the microcarrier in the form of N,N,N-trimethyl-2-hydroxyaminopropyl groups. The resulting microcarriers had a very low capacity to bind proteins from the culture medium (e.g. albumin and IgG) and such proteins could be removed from the cultures more efficiently than when using previous microcarriers. A new principle was used for the development of the other type of microcarrier. A surface layer of cross-linked denatured collagen provided the surface for growth of cells. These microcarriers provided a “natural” substrate for cell growth and allowed improved attachment and spreading of cells with epithelial morphology. Harvesting cells from these microcarriers with proteolytic enzymes was more efficient than with previous microcarriers. The two alternative microcarriers should result in improved process efficiency and have a potential value in the preparation of live vaccines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Bornstein and H. Sage, 1980, Structurally distinct collagen types, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 49:957–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Engvall and E. Rouslahti, 1977, Binding of soluble form of fibroblast surface protein, fibronectin to collagen, Int. J. Cancer, 20:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Engvall, E. Rouslahti and E.J. Miller, 1978, Affinity of fibronectin to collagens of different genetic types and to fibrinogen, J. Exp. Med., 147:1584–1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L.I. Gold and E. Pearlstein, 1980, Fibronectin-collagen binding and requirements during cellular adhesion, Biochem. J., 186:551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.J. Giard and R.J. Fleischaker, 1980, Examination of parameters affecting human interferon production with microcarrier-grown fibroblast cells, Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherap., 18:130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Grinnell, 1978, Cellular adhesiveness and extra-cellular substata, Int. Rev. Cytol., 53:65–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Grinnell, M. Feld and D. Minter, 1980, Fibroblast adhesion to fibronogen and fibrin substrata: Requirement for cold insoluble globulin (plasma fibronectin), Cell, 19:517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Gubenŝek and S. Lapanje, 1968, Potentiometric titration studies of diethylaminoethyl dextran base, J. Macromol. Sci. Chem., A2:1045–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Hirtenstein and J. Clark, 1980, Attachment and proliferation of animal cells on microcarriers (Cytodex ™1). In “Tissue Culture in Medical Research” eds. R.J. Richards, K.T. Rajan, pp.97–104, Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hirtenstein, J. Clark, G. Lindren and P. Vretblad, 1980, Microcarriers for animal cell culture: a brief review of theory and practice, Develop. Biol. Standard, 46:109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Höök, K. Rubin, Å. Oldenberg, B. Öbrink and A. Vaheri, 1977, Cold-insoluble globulin mediates the adhesion of rat liver cells to plastic petri dishes, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Coram., 79: 726–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.W. Levine, D.I.C. Wang and W.G. Thilly, 1979, Optimization of growth surface parameters in microcarrier culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 21:821–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Manousos, M. Ahmed, C. Torchio, J. Wolff, G. Shibley, R. Stephens and S. Mayyasi, 1980, Feasibility studies of oncornavirus production in microcarrier cultures, In Vitro, 16:507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Meignier, H. Mougeot and H. Favreè, 1980, Foot and mouth disease virus production on microcarrier-grown cells, Develop. Biol. Standard, 46:249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Mered, P. Albrecht and H.E. Hopps, 1980, Cell growth optimization in microcarrier culture, In Vitro, 16:859–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B.J. Montagnon, B. Fanget and A.J. Nicolas, 1981, The largescale cultivation of Vero cells in microcarrier culture for virus vaccine production. Preliminary results for killed poliovirus vaccine, Develop. Biol. Standard., 47: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, 1980, Microcarrier cell culture, Technical notes, 1, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, 1974, Dextran Fractions, Dextran Sulphate, DEAE-Dextran. Defined polymers for biological research, Technical Book Series, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.M. Reid and M. Rojkind, 1979, New techniques for culturing differentiated cells: reconstituted basement membrane rafts, Methods. Enzymol., 58: 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.K. Sanford, W.R. Earle, V.J. Evans, H.K. Waltz and J.E. Shannon, 1951, The measurement of proliferation in tissue cultures by enumeration of cell nuclei, J. Natl. Cancer Res. Inst., 11:773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A, von Seefried and J.H. Chun, 1981, Serially subcultivated cells as substrates for poliovirus production for vaccine, Develop. Biol. Standard., 47:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.L. van Wezel, C.A.M. van der Velden-de Groot and J.A.M. van Herwaarden, 1980, The production of inactivated polio vaccine on serially cultivated kidney cells from captive-bred monkeys, Develop. Biol. Standard., 46:151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Yaffe, 1973, Rat skeletal muscle cells. In “Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications”, eds. P.F. Kruse, M.K. Patterson, pp. 106–114, Academic Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gebb, C. et al. (1984). Alternative Surfaces for Microcarrier Culture of Animal Cells. In: Acton, R.T., Daniel Lynn, J. (eds) Eukaryotic Cell Cultures. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 172. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9376-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9376-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9378-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9376-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics