Skip to main content

The Pragmatic Structure of Rhetorical Maturity in the Sciences

  • Chapter
  • 164 Accesses

Part of the book series: Topics in Language and Linguistics ((TLLI))

Abstract

There is little doubt that successful writing possesses an inherent logic all its own. Our certainty on this point regarding logical, mature writing style reflects our definitions of clear writing, often designed to encourage the novice rhetorician or the teacher of rhetoric. Such definitions, of course, have a centuries-old tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blanton, Mackie J-V., 1976, Producing content grammars for advanced learners in the sciences, 111. TESOL/Bilingual Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, Mackie J-V., 1979, English for specific purposes, Am. Soc. Engin. Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, Mackie J-V., 1980, The Structure of scientific and technical rhetoric, Invited Lecturer Series, SUNY Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, Earl W., 1975, What is technical writing?: A redefinition, in: “The Teaching of Technical Writing, Donald H. Cunningham and Herman A. Estrim, eds., NCTE, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusaw, Charles T., et al., 1976, “Handbook of Technical Writing,” St. Martin’s, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Scott, 1972, “Truth in the Sciences,” U. of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, J. T., 1980, Temporal precision in circadian systems: a reliable neuromal clock from unreliable components, Science, 209:1542–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1981, The Secrets in the tissue of a mouse: a review of June Goodfield’s “An Imagined World: A Story of Scientific Discovery,” The New York Times Book Review, April 19:80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locker, K., 1980, Patterns for organization of business writing, J. of Bus. Comm., 14:35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockley, M. G., et al., 1980, Fourier-transformed infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy of biological materials, Science, 210:918–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selinker, Larry, 1980, Some examples of scientific and technical English genres, TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, Prentice and Cooper, Robert G. Jr., 1980, Perception of numbers by human infants, Science, 210: 1033–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y Cajal, Ramon, 1893, “Precepts and Counsels on Scientific Investigations, Psychology of Mind Institute Studies, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blanton, M.JV. (1982). The Pragmatic Structure of Rhetorical Maturity in the Sciences. In: Frawley, W. (eds) Linguistics and Literacy. Topics in Language and Linguistics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9302-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9302-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9304-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9302-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics