Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 15))

Abstract

After reviewing 31 different descriptions of maintainability, Rigby and his associates developed the following definition:

“Maintainability is a quality of the combined features and characteristics of equipment design, job aids, and job supports which facilitate the rapidity, economy, ease, and accuracy with which maintenance operations can be performed, and the system thus kept in or returned to operating condition, by average ... personnel, under the environmental conditions in which the system will be maintained.” (Rigby, et al, 1961, as quoted in Crawford and Altman, 1972).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon, “One Way to Minimize NC Downtime”, Iron Age, 222, May, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandow, R.W., “A Maintenance Overview of CAM Technology”, Manufacturing Engineering, July 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J.M., “Human Factors Considerations in Design for Reliability and Maintainability”, In Pew, R.W., “Human Factors Engineering”, Course No. 7936, Engineering Summer conferences, The University of Michigan, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B.M. and Altman, J.W., “Designing for Maintainability” in VanCott, H.P. and Kinkade, R.G. (eds.), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feineman, G., “How To Live with Reliability Engineers”, Spectrum, Spring, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geise, J. and Haller, W.W. (eds.), Maintainability Engineering, Martin-Marietta Corporation and Duke University, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D.B. and Rosenfeld, A.T., Energy Conservation in Home Applicances Through Comparison Shopping: Facts and Fact Sheets, LBL-5236, Energy Extension Services, State of California, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.B. (Chm.), Safety Recommendations A-79–98 through 105, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., December 21, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, J., “Controlled English Avoids Multi-Translations”, Industrial Engineering, February, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuba, H.R., “Maintainability Prediction — The Next Generation”, Proceedings of the Spring Session or Reliability, Maintainability, etc., HIE, Boston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, L.L. and Aiken, C.A., Cost of Owning and Operating an Automobile,’ U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, P.F. and O’Toole, P.I., “I.E.’s and Cost Estimating”, Industrial Engineering, February, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, C.T., “Microprocessor Control Diagnoses Welder Faults”, Iron Age, 222, 41, November 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, L.V., Cooper, J.I. and Spickard, W.P., Guide to Integrated System Design for Maintainability, ASD Tech. Report 61–424, WPAFB, Ohio, October, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, L.V., The Saudia Human Error Rate Bank (SHERB). SC-R-67--1150, Saudia Labs. Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W.B., “Human Problem Solving Performance in a Fault Diagnosis Task”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-8, No. 4, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W.B., “A Model of Human Decision Making in a Fault Diagnosis Task”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-8, No. 5, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W.B., “A Model of Human Decision Making in Fault Diagnosis Tasks That Include Feedback and Redundancy”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-9, No. 4, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W.B., “Problem Solving Performance of Maintenance Trainees in a Fault Diagnosis Task”, Human Factors, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W.B., “Problem Solving Performance of First Semester Maintenance Trainees in Two Fault Diagnosis Tasks”, Human Factors, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D., Campbell, W.B., Potter, N.R. and Askren, W.B., Relationships Between Human Resource Factors and Performance on Nuclear Missile Handling Tasks. AFHRL-TR-76–85/AFWL-TR-76--301, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory/Air Force Weapons Laboratory, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranhagen, J.F. Jr., How good are Maintenance Data? Spectrum, Spring, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christensen, J.M., Howard, J.M. (1981). Field Experience in Maintenance. In: Rasmussen, J., Rouse, W.B. (eds) Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures. NATO Conference Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9230-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics