Skip to main content

Ship Navigational Failure Detection and Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 15))

Abstract

The navigation of ships through the world’s waters presents a continuing problem of system failure detection and diagnosis. In open, unrestricted waters with little or no traffic, the ship navigation system is fairly tolerant of errors and other failures. As ships approach narrow, restricted channels and increasing traffic densities, the systems failure tolerance decreases.

The author is strictly responsible for this paper; it does not necessarily represent U.S. Coast Guard official positions or policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, D. (ed.), 1977, “Human Factors in the Design and Operation of Ships”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on the title subject, Gothenberg, Sweden, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R., 1979, Letter to J.S. Gardenier re: “Bridge Team, Training”, London, Shell International Marine Limited, 9 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.L., 1966, “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research”, Chicago, Rand--McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAORF Research Staff, 1979, “A Compendium of Collision Avoidance Performance Using Various Shipboard Electronic Aids”, Computer-Aided Operations Research Facility Report 13–7901-01, Kings Point, New York, National Maritime Research Center, April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, J.C., Ponce, Paul V., and Snider, W.D., 1975, “Tankship Accidents and Resulting Oil Outflows, 1969–1973”, 1975 Conference on Prevention and Control of Oil Pollution. Washington, D.C., American Petroleum Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W.A. and Tuilier, P.M., 1974, “Spill Risk Analysis Program, Phase II: Methodology Development and Demonstration”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-15–75, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A785026, August 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragher, W.E. et al., 1979, “Deepwater Ports Approach/Exit Hazard and Risk Assessment”, esp. Appendix G, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-6–79, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A074529, February 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragher, W.E. et al., 1979, “Deepwater Port Hazards and Risk Assessment”, esp. Appendix G, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-6–79, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A074529, February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardenier, J.S., 1976, “Toward a Science of Merchant Marine Safety”, Marine Traffic Systems, Rotterdam, Netherlands Maritime Institute (1976) Major extracts reprinted in Schiff und Hafen 7:613–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardenier, J.S., 1979, “Where Are We Headed With Vessel Bridge Simulators?”, Proceedings of the Third CAORF Symposium: Marine Simulation Research, October 15–16, 1979 Kings Point, New York, National Maritime Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A.L., Holyoak, K.J., and Santa, J.L., 1979, Cognition, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, W.C., 1979, “Fault Tree Analysis”, Appendixes D and E of Deepwater Port Hazard and Risk Analysis, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-6–79, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A074529, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W.O., 1978, “Human Factors”, Oil Companies International Marine Forum Safe Navigation Symposium, Washington, D.C., 17–18 January 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, T.J., 1979, “Validation of Mate Behaviour on CAORF”, Kings Point, New York, Computer-Aided Operations Research Facility, February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, W.O. et al., 1968, “Human Engineering Guidelines Applicable to Merchant Marine Bridge Design”, Vol. III of Human Factors in Ship Control, Connecticut, General Dynamics Corporation, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD PB 179357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffner, J.R., 1976, “Pilotage in Confined Waterways of the United States: A Preliminary Study of Pilot Decision-Making”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-96–76, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A029715, July 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffner, J.R., 1978, “Pilotage in the Port of New York”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-81–78, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS, July 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, 1978, “Final Act of the International Conference on Training and Certification of Seafarers, London, IMCO (STW/CONF/12, 5 July 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mara, T. et al., 1968, “Human Factors in Ship Control”, Vols. I–III, Groton, Connecticut, General Dynamics Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H., 1950, “The Nature of Physical Reality: A Philosophy of Modern Physics”, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • “MARSIM 78: First International Conference on Marine Simulation, September 5–8, 1978”, London, The Nautical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreby, D.H., 1975, “The Human Element in Shipping”, Colchester, England, Seatrade Publications, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, 1976, “Human Error in Merchant Marine Safety”, Washington, D.C., NAS Commission on Sociotechnical Systems, Maritime Transportation Research Board, June 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Transportation Safety Board, 1978, “Marine Accident Report: Collision of USS L.Y. SPEAR (AS-36) and Motor Tankship ZEPHYROS (Liberian), Lower Mississippi River, February 22, 1978”, Washington, D.C. N.B. The fact and error summaries herein were extracted and interpreted by the author from this one report, with no supplementary source of data. As of this writing, the official U.S. Coast Guard findings on the same accident were not available to the author or to the public.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramore, B. et al., “Task Performance Problems in Reports of Collisions, Rammings, and Groundings in Harbors and Entrances”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-28–79, Springfield, Virginia, National Technical Information Service NTIS AD A071658, March 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramore, B. et al., 1979, “Human and Physical Factors Affecting Collisions, Rammings, and Groundings on Western Rivers and Gulf Intracoastal Waterways”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-80–78, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A074290, January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Proceedings of the Third CAORF Symposium: Marine Simulation Research, October 15–16, 1979”, Kings Point, New York, National Maritime Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, J., 1977, “The Design of Shipboard Organization: Some Experiences with a Matrix-Type of Organization in Norway”, Maritime Policy Management 4:265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, T.R., 1980, “Human Error in Nuclear Power Plants”, Technology Review 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. et al., 1976, “Task Analysis Report Relative to Vessel Collisions, Rammings, and Groundings”, Vol. II. U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-1–77, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A037317 (Associated Volumes are I, AD A037316 and III, AD A037442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Myriam, 1980, Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoehr, L.A. et al., 1976, “Spill Risk Analysis: Methodology Development and Demonstration”, U.S. Coast Guard Report CG-D-21–77, Springfield, Virginia, NTIS AD A043054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C., 1966, “In the Outlaw Area”, New Yorker.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Coast Guard, Annual, “Marine Safety Statistical Review”, Commandant Instruction M16700.2, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, L.R., 1975, “Human Causal Factors in Maritime Casualty and Near Casualty in the United States Merchant Marine”, Kings Point, New York, National Maritime Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardenier, J.S. (1981). Ship Navigational Failure Detection and Diagnosis. In: Rasmussen, J., Rouse, W.B. (eds) Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures. NATO Conference Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9230-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics