Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intracellular Location of Phytochrome

  • Chapter
Book cover Trends in Photobiology

Abstract

Attempts to elucidate the molecular mechanism of phytochrome action must reconcile two superficially contradictory sets of data: (a) Physiological studies where rapid, phytochrome-mediated changes in membrane properties have led to the hypothesis that the pigment directly modifies cellular membrane function as its primary action upon photoconversion to pfp.1,2,3,4 and (b) Biochemical and immunocytochemical studies where most of the phytochrome is, respec tively, extractable as a water soluble protein under conventional conditions and apparently uniformly distributed in the cytosol in situ -at least in unirradiated, etiolated tissue.5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. B. Hendricks and H. A. Borthwick, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.58:2125 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Smith, Nature, 227:665 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. L. Satter and A. W. Galston, in: “Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments,” T. W. Goodwin, ed., Academic Press, New York (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Haupt and M. H. Weisenseel, in: “Light and Plant Develop ment,” H. Smith, ed., Butterworths, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. H. Pratt, in: “Photochemical and Photobiological Reviews,” vol. 4, K. C. Smith, ed., Plenum Publishing Corp., New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Mohr, Photochem. Photobiol. 20:542 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. J. Singer, Ann. Rev. Bioehem., 43:805 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Singer, J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 58:452 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. B. Johnson and R. Tasker, Plant Cell Envir., 2:259 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Brownlee, N. Roth-Bejerano and R. E. Kendrick, Sci. Prog. Oxf., 66:217 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Rubinstein, K. S. Drury, and R. B. Park, Plant Physiol.,44:105 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. S. Hillman, in: “Phytochrome,” K. Mitrakos and W. Shropshire, Jr., eds., Academic Press, New York (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. H. Vanderhoef, W. R. Briggs and P. H. Quail, Plant Physiol.,63:1062 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. R. Briggs and H. P. Chon, Plant Physiol., 41:1159 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Oelze-Karow and H. Mohr, Photochem. Photobiol., 18:319 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Loercher, Plant Physiol., 41:932 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. S. Hillman, Physiol. Plant., 18:346 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. G. Hopkins and H. S. Hillman, Plant Physiol., 41:593 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Mersey and M. E. McCully, J. Microscopy, 114:49 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Tanford and J. A. Reynolds, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 457:133 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. H. Quail and E. Schäfer, J. Membrane Biol., 15:393 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. H. Pratt and D. Marmé, Plant Physiol., 58:686 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Uy and F. Wold, Science, 198:890 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. L. Boeshore and L. H. Pratt, Plant Physiol., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Marmé, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 28:173 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Marmé, in: “Plant Growth and Light Perception,” B. Deutch, B. I. Deutch and A. 0. Gyldenholm, eds., Aarhus (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. H. Pratt, Photochem. Photobiol., 27:81 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. H. Quail, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 30:425 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Manabe and M. Furuya, Plant Physiol., 53:343 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. E. E. Billet and H. Smith, Ann. Europ. Sympos. Photomorph. Abstracts, p. 5 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Evans and H. Smith, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 73:138 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Evans and H. Smith, Nature, 259:323 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Marmé, J. Bianco and J. Gross, in: “Light and Plant Development,” H. Smith, ed., Butterworths, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. J. Roux and C. C. Hale, 8th Internat. Photobiol. Congress Abstr., p. 102 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. D. Slocum and S. J. Roux, Plant Physiol. Supp., 65:101 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Manabe and M. Furuya, Plant Physiol., 51:982 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. T. E. Cedel and S. J. Roux, Plant Physiol. Supp., 59:101 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  38. T. E. Cedel and S. J. Roux, Plant Physiol. Supp., 61:52 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. Penel, H. Greppin and J. Boisard, Plant Sci. Lett. 6:117 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. T. Tezuka and Y. Yamamoto, Plant Physiol., 53:717 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. D. W. Hopkins and W. R. Briggs, Plant Physiol. Supp., 51:52 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. A. M. Welburn and A. R. Wellburn, New Phytol., 72:55 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. H. W. Schmidt and R. Hampp, Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 82:428 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. J. Jaffe, in: “Light and Plant Development,” H. Smith, ed.,Butterworths, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. J. Cooke, P. F. Saunders and R. E. Kendrick, Planta, 124:319 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J. R. Hilton and H. Smith, Planta, 148:312 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. R. J. Cooke and R. E. Kendrick, Planta, 131:303 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. J. E. Graebe and H. J. Ropers, in: “Phytohormones and Related Compounds: A Comprehensive Treatise,” Vol. 1, S. L. Letham, P. B. Goodwin and T. J. Higgins, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam(1978).

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Gross, A. Ayadi and D. Marmé, Photochem. Photobiol., 30:615 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. A. M. Jose, Planta, 137:203 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. A. M. Jose and E. Schäfer, Planta, 146:75 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. S. Frosch, E. Wagner and B. G. Cumming, Can. J. Bot., 51:1355 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R. T. Leonard, D. Hansen and T. K. Hodges, Plant Physiol., 51:749 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. P. H. Quail, D. Marmé and E. Schäfer, Nature New Biol., 245:189 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  55. P. H. Quail, Photochem. Photobiol., 22:299 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. P. H. Quail and W. R. Briggs, Plant Physiol., 62:773 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. P. H. Quail, Photochem. Photobiol., 27:759 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. L. H. Pratt, Plant Physiol., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. P. H. Quail and W. R. Briggs, Plant Physiol., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. K. T. Yamamota, W. O. Smith and M. Furuya, Photochem.Photobiol., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. D. Marmé, J. Boisard and W. R. Briggs, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 70:3861 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. P. H. Quail, Planta, 118:357 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. K. Yamamoto and M. Furuya, Planta, 127:177 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. H. Smith, A. Evans and J. R. Hilton, Planta, 141:71 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. N. Roth-Bejerano and R. E. Kendrick, Plant Physiol., 63:503 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. G. Georgevich, T. E. Cedel and S. J. Roux, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 74:4439 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. P. H. Quail, Planta, 123:223 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. P. H. Quail, Planta, 123:235 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. D. Marmé, J. Supramol. Struc., 2:751 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. M. M. Cordonnier and L. H. Pratt, in: “Photoreceptors and Plant Development,” J. DeGreef ed., Antwerp, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. P. Cuatrecasas and M. D. Hollenberg, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 62:31 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. J. L. Phillips, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 71:726 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. M. R. Sussman and H. Kende, Planta, 140:251 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. R. A. Coleman and L. H. Pratt, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22:1039 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. J. M. Mackenzie, R. A. Coleman, W. R. Briggs and L. H. Pratt, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 72:799 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. J. M. Mackenzie, W. R. Briggs and L. H. Pratt, Amer. J. Bot., 65:671 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. L. B. Kass and L. H. Pratt, Plant Physiol. Supp., 61:13 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  78. B. L. Epel, W. L. Butler, L. H. Pratt and K. T. Tokuyasu, in: “Photoreceptors and Plant Development,” J. DeGreef, ed., Antwerp, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. B. E. S. Gunning, Eur. J. Cell Biol., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. A. L. Goldberg and A. C. St. John, Ann. Rev. Bioehem., 45:747(1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. W. F. Prouty, M. J. Karnovsky and A. L. Goldberg, J. Biol.Chem., 250:1112 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  82. J. M. Mackenzie, W. R. Briggs and L. H. Pratt, PIanta, 141:129(1978).

    Google Scholar 

  83. H. J. Stone and L. H. Pratt, Plant Physiol., 63:680 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. M. Jabben, Planta, 149:91 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Peter H. Quail

Authors
  1. Peter H. Quail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Biophysique, INSERM U201, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France

    C. Hélène  & Th. Montenay-Garestier  & 

  2. Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS, Orléans, France

    C. Hélène  & M. Charlier  & 

  3. Laboratoire de Physique, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France

    G. Laustriat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quail, P.H. (1982). Intracellular Location of Phytochrome. In: Hélène, C., Charlier, M., Montenay-Garestier, T., Laustriat, G. (eds) Trends in Photobiology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9203-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9203-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9205-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9203-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation