Skip to main content

Sign Language and Psycholinguistic Process: Fact, Hypotheses, and Implications for Interpretation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 6))

Abstract

It is true, as some of the papers in this conference have recognized, that laboratory studies of language cannot directly be carried over and used as models of naturally occurring language processes. Yet, even if laboratory experiments do represent artificial situations, the people in those experiments are very real. Thus, we cannot uncritically reject laboratory results any more than we can uncritically accept them. Instead, we should ask empirically just how relevant lab results are, and carry out the studies needed to find out. My work is based on long-standing psychological laboratory paradigms, but I hope that you will agree that it has much broader implications. Each of its implications will, of course, require separate test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, D. A. Seeing Essential English. Vol I and II. Anaheim, California: Educational Services Division, Anaheim Union High School District, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barik, H. C. Simultaneous interpretation: Temporal and quantitative data. Language and Speech, 1973, 16, 237–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battison, R. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 5, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U., and Klima, E. S. Aspects of sign language and its structure. In J. F. Kavanagh, and J. E. Cutting, (Eds.)., The Role of Speech in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1975a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U., and Klima, E. S. Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In S. Harnad, (Ed.)., Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1975b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U., Klima, E. S., and Siple, P. Remembering in signs. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 3, 93–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., and Clark., E. V.. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. Speech and reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, and I. G. Mattingly, (Eds.). Language by Ear and by Eye: The Relationships between Speech and Reading. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, G. C. Sign Me Alice: A Play in Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Bookstore, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. and Garrett, M. F. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 1971, 47, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerver, D. Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model In R. W. Brislin, (Ed.). Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Eisler, F., and Cohen, M. An experimental study of interference between receptive and productive processes relating to simultaneous translation. Language and Speech, 1974, 17, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewes, G. W. Gesture language in cultural contact. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 4, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoemann, H. W. The American Sign Language: Lexical and Grammatical Notes with Translation Exercises. Silver Spring, Maryland: National Association of the Deaf, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoemann, H. W., The transparency of meaning of Sign Language gestures. Sign Language Studies, 1975, 7, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. About the relation between visual and auditory signs. In R. Jakobson, Selected Writings II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower, (Ed.)., On Translation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. Sound and its absence in the linguistic symbol. In J. Kavanagh and J. Cutting, (Eds.). The Role of Speech in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H., Boyes-Braem, P., and Bellugi, U. Preliminaries to a distinctive feature analysis of American Sign Language. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 8, 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddell, S. K. Restrictive Relative Clauses in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript. The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallery, G. Sign Language Among North American Indians, Compared with that Among Other Peoples and Deaf-Mutes. First Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. J. W. Powell, (Ed.)., 1881, 263–552. (Reprinted 1972, The Hague: Mouton & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and Isard, S. Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., and Nicely, P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, J., Hamayan, E., and Ahmar, H. Memory for language of input in polyglots. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975, 7, 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sales, B. D., Cole, R. A., and Haber, R. N. Mechanisms of aural encoding: VIII. Phonetic interference and context-sensitive coding in short-term memory. Memory and Cognition, 1974, 2, 596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siple, P., Fischer, S. D., and Bellugi, U. Memory for non-semantic attributes of American Sign Language signs and English words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Semiotics and Human Sign Languages. The Hague, Mouton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Classification and description of sign languages. In T. A. Sebeok., (Ed.)., Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 12: Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences. The Hague, Mouton, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Sign Language structure, an outline of the visual communications systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Paper #8 1960, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., and Heiman, G. W. The effect of sign language grammatical structural on recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977, 10, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., Heiman, G. W. and Hoemann, H. W. Psychological processing of sign language: Effect of visual disruption on sign intelligibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977, 106, 225–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., and Hoemann, H. W. Translation and sign language. In R. W. Brislin., (Ed.), Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, Inc. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., Liddell, S. K., and Bellugi, U. The perception of grammatical boundaries in ASL. Unpublished manuscript. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. C., Jr., A report on Montana-Washington implicational research. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 4, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tweney, R.D. (1978). Sign Language and Psycholinguistic Process: Fact, Hypotheses, and Implications for Interpretation. In: Gerver, D., Sinaiko, H.W. (eds) Language Interpretation and Communication. NATO Conference Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9079-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9077-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics