Abstract
It is true, as some of the papers in this conference have recognized, that laboratory studies of language cannot directly be carried over and used as models of naturally occurring language processes. Yet, even if laboratory experiments do represent artificial situations, the people in those experiments are very real. Thus, we cannot uncritically reject laboratory results any more than we can uncritically accept them. Instead, we should ask empirically just how relevant lab results are, and carry out the studies needed to find out. My work is based on long-standing psychological laboratory paradigms, but I hope that you will agree that it has much broader implications. Each of its implications will, of course, require separate test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anthony, D. A. Seeing Essential English. Vol I and II. Anaheim, California: Educational Services Division, Anaheim Union High School District, 1971.
Barik, H. C. Simultaneous interpretation: Temporal and quantitative data. Language and Speech, 1973, 16, 237–270.
Battison, R. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 5, 1–19.
Bellugi, U., and Klima, E. S. Aspects of sign language and its structure. In J. F. Kavanagh, and J. E. Cutting, (Eds.)., The Role of Speech in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1975a.
Bellugi, U., and Klima, E. S. Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In S. Harnad, (Ed.)., Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1975b.
Bellugi, U., Klima, E. S., and Siple, P. Remembering in signs. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 3, 93–125.
Clark, H. H., and Clark., E. V.. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.
Conrad, R. Speech and reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, and I. G. Mattingly, (Eds.). Language by Ear and by Eye: The Relationships between Speech and Reading. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1972.
Eastman, G. C. Sign Me Alice: A Play in Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Bookstore, 1974.
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. and Garrett, M. F. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
Fromkin, V. A. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 1971, 47, 27–52.
Gerver, D. Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model In R. W. Brislin, (Ed.). Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, Inc., 1976.
Goldman-Eisler, F., and Cohen, M. An experimental study of interference between receptive and productive processes relating to simultaneous translation. Language and Speech, 1974, 17, 1–10.
Hewes, G. W. Gesture language in cultural contact. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 4, 1–34.
Hoemann, H. W. The American Sign Language: Lexical and Grammatical Notes with Translation Exercises. Silver Spring, Maryland: National Association of the Deaf, 1976.
Hoemann, H. W., The transparency of meaning of Sign Language gestures. Sign Language Studies, 1975, 7, 151–161.
Jakobson, R. About the relation between visual and auditory signs. In R. Jakobson, Selected Writings II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.
Jakobson, R. On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower, (Ed.)., On Translation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1959.
Klima, E. S. Sound and its absence in the linguistic symbol. In J. Kavanagh and J. Cutting, (Eds.). The Role of Speech in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1975.
Lane, H., Boyes-Braem, P., and Bellugi, U. Preliminaries to a distinctive feature analysis of American Sign Language. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 8, 263–289.
Liddell, S. K. Restrictive Relative Clauses in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript. The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California, 1975.
Mallery, G. Sign Language Among North American Indians, Compared with that Among Other Peoples and Deaf-Mutes. First Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. J. W. Powell, (Ed.)., 1881, 263–552. (Reprinted 1972, The Hague: Mouton & Co.).
Miller, G. A. and Isard, S. Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 217–228.
Miller, G. A., and Nicely, P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 338–352.
Saegert, J., Hamayan, E., and Ahmar, H. Memory for language of input in polyglots. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975, 7, 607–613.
Sales, B. D., Cole, R. A., and Haber, R. N. Mechanisms of aural encoding: VIII. Phonetic interference and context-sensitive coding in short-term memory. Memory and Cognition, 1974, 2, 596–600.
Siple, P., Fischer, S. D., and Bellugi, U. Memory for non-semantic attributes of American Sign Language signs and English words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 561–574.
Steiner, G. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Semiotics and Human Sign Languages. The Hague, Mouton, 1972.
Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Classification and description of sign languages. In T. A. Sebeok., (Ed.)., Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 12: Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences. The Hague, Mouton, 1974.
Stokoe, W. C., Jr. Sign Language structure, an outline of the visual communications systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Paper #8 1960, Buffalo, New York.
Tweney, R. D., and Heiman, G. W. The effect of sign language grammatical structural on recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977, 10, 331–334.
Tweney, R. D., Heiman, G. W. and Hoemann, H. W. Psychological processing of sign language: Effect of visual disruption on sign intelligibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977, 106, 225–268.
Tweney, R. D., and Hoemann, H. W. Translation and sign language. In R. W. Brislin., (Ed.), Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, Inc. 1976.
Tweney, R. D., Liddell, S. K., and Bellugi, U. The perception of grammatical boundaries in ASL. Unpublished manuscript. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, 1977.
Woodward, J. C., Jr., A report on Montana-Washington implicational research. Sign Language Studies, 1974, 4, 77–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tweney, R.D. (1978). Sign Language and Psycholinguistic Process: Fact, Hypotheses, and Implications for Interpretation. In: Gerver, D., Sinaiko, H.W. (eds) Language Interpretation and Communication. NATO Conference Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9079-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9077-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive