Skip to main content

Effect of Detergents on the Utilization of Sphingomyelin by Brain Sphingomyelinases

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 101))

Abstract

Complex lipids belonging to the group classified as “insoluble, swelling amphiphilic lipids” (1) form multibilayered liposomes when dispersed in aqueous media. These large aggregates are generally poor substrates for enzymatic utilization and, for interaction with suitable enzymes must be further dispersed or “solubilized”. This is usually done with the aid of a detergent (reviewed in ref. 2), although some success was obtained with sonicated, single-bilayered liposomes (e.g., 3). The exact nature of the effect, by the detergent that facilitates the interaction with the enzyme is still rather obscure. For numerous enzymatic reactions a nonionic detergent (e.g., Triton X-100) * or an anionic detergent (e.g., sodium dodecylsulfate or bile salts) was used; in some cases detergent mixtures were employed (2). It is generally assumed that the detergent exerts its beneficiary action by solubilizing the substrate. However, with some enzymes that utilize lipid substrates, a detergent enhanced reaction rates even when using a non-lipid, water-soluble substrate (e.g., (β-glucosidase using p-nitrophenyl glucoside (4) or methyl umbiliferyl glucoside (5). In such a case the detergent most probably affects the enzyme rather than the substrate. It is self-evident that if a lipid substrate (e.g., glucosyl-ceramide) is the substrate for the same enzyme, the detergent also solubilizes the substrate further to its affecting the enzyme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Small, D.M. (1970) Fed. Proc., 29, 1320–1326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatt, S. (1973) in Metabolic Inhibitors, Vol. 4. Edited by Hochster, R. M., Kates, M. and Quastel, J.H. Academic Press, pp. 349–387.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gatt, S. and Rapport, M. M. (1966) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 113, 567–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatt, S., Herzl, A. and Barenholz, Y. (1973) FEBS Letters 30, 281–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, M.W. (1973) Biochem. J. 136, 721–729.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatt, S. and Gottesdiner, T. (1976), J. Neurochem. 26, 421–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatt, S. (1976) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 68, 235–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gottesdiner, T. and Gatt, S. (1977) Israel J. Med. Sci., in press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gatt, S., Dinur, T. and Leibovitz Ben-Gershon, Z., Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barenholz, Y., Rottman, A. and Gatt, S. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 3731–3737.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, G.V., Yedgar, S. and Barenholz, Y. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 363, 86–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yedgar, S., Cooper, G.V., and Barenholz, Y. (1974) Ibid., pp. 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenberg, D., Yedgar, S. and Gatt, S., Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yedgar, S. and Gatt, S. (1976) Biochem. 15, 2570–2573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Small, D.M. (1971) in The Bile Acids, Vol. 1. Edited by Nair, P.P. and Kritchevski, D., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 249–356.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, P.B. and Kennedy, E.P. (1967) J. Lipid Res. 8, 202209

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hirschfeld, D. and Loyter, A. (1975) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 167, 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao, B.G. and Spence, M.W. (1970) J. Lipid Res. 17, 506–515.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gatt, S. and Dinur, T. (1977) Proceedings of the 6th International Meeting of the International Society for Neurochemistry, Copenhagen, Aug. 21–26, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gatt, S., Dinur, T. and Kopolovic, submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi, S. and Suzuki, K. (1977) J. Biol. Chem., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gatt, S. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 37 24–3730.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yavin, E. and Gatt, S. (1969) Biochem. 8, 1692–1698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sugita, M., Williams, M., Dulaney, J. T. and Moser, H.W. (1975), Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 398, 1 25–131.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holloway, P.N. (1973) Anal. Biochem. 53, 304–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatt, S., Dinur, T., Yedgar, S., Leibovitz-Ben Gershon, Z. (1978). Effect of Detergents on the Utilization of Sphingomyelin by Brain Sphingomyelinases. In: Gatt, S., Freysz, L., Mandel, P. (eds) Enzymes of Lipid Metabolism. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 101. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9071-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9071-2_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9073-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9071-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics