Pharmacological Influences Upon Human Ethanol Self-Administration
A human experimental model of the ethanol self-administration aspect of alcoholism is described which is sensitive to pharmacological manipulations which influence alcoholics1 disposition to drink. Volunteer male alcoholics are permitted to self-administer ethanol daily under experimental conditions which prevent the wide spontaneous fluctuation of intake commonly observed in laboratory drinking situations. Drinking is stabilized by restrictions on amount of ethanol available, temporal conditions of availability, response cost and consequences of drinking. Three experiments illustrate the sensitivity of the paradigm to pharmacological factors. In Experiment I, alcoholics ingested more of the available drinks as ethanol dose per drink increased. Twelve drinks were available daily in a 6.25-hour session. Dose per drink varied between 1.86 and 11.14 g ethanol. In Experiment II, alcoholics ingested more of the available drinks when the dose was available in a higher concentration than when the same dose was available in a lower concentration. The effect was replicated at three different doses — 2.28, 5.57, and 11.14 g ethanol per drink. Twelve drinks daily were available in a 5.75-hr session and beverage concentration was varied between 1.3 and 47.5 percent ethanol by volume. In Experiment III, oral preloads of beverages containing ethanol increased the number of drinks consumed during the ensuing ethanol self-administration session. When ethanol self-administration was suppressed either by brief contingent isolation or by response cost, preloads of 77.7 g ethanol increased self-administration.
KeywordsEthanol Intake Response Cost Ethanol Dose Pharmacological Influence Human Experimental Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bigelow, G., Griffiths, R. R., and Liebson, I. Experimental models for the modification of human drug self-administration: Methodological developments in the study of ethanol self-administration by alcoholics. Federation Proc., 34:1785–1792, 1975.Google Scholar
- Bigelow, G., and Liebson, I. Cost factors controlling alcoholic drinking. Psychol. Rec., 22:305–314, 1972.Google Scholar
- Bigelow, G., Liebson, I., and Griffiths, R. R. Experimental analysis of alcoholic drinking. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada, August, 1973.Google Scholar
- Brady, J., and Griffiths, R. R. Behavioral procedures for evaluating the relative abuse potential of CNS drugs in primates. Federation Proc, 35:2245–2253, 1976.Google Scholar
- Cutter, H., Schwaab, E., and Nathan, P. Effects of alcohol on its utility for alcoholics and nonalcoholics. Quart. J. Stud. Alc, 312:369–378, 1970.Google Scholar
- Engle, K. B., and Williams, T. K. Effect of an ounce of vodka on alcoholics’ desire for alcohol. Quart. J. Stud. Alc, 33:1099–1105, 1972.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G., and Liebson, I. Human sedative self-administration: Effects of temporal and dose manipulations. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap., 197:488–494, 1976b.Google Scholar
- Mello, N. A semantic aspect of alcoholism. In H. D. Cappell and A. E. LeBlanc (Eds.) Biological and Behavioral Approaches to Drug Dependence, pp 73–87. Toronto, Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Research Foundation, 1975.Google Scholar
- Mello, N. K., and Mendelson, J. H. Experimentally induced intoxication in alcoholics: A comparison between programmed and spontaneous drinking. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap., 173:101–116, 1970.Google Scholar
- Mottin, J. Drug-induced attenuation of alcohol consumption. Quart. J. Stud. Alc, 34:444–472, 1973.Google Scholar
- Nathan, P., Zare, N., Ferneau, E., and Lowenstein, L. Effects of congener differences in alcoholic beverages on the behavior of alcoholics. Quart. J. Stud. Alc, Suppl. No. 5:87–100, 1970.Google Scholar